Role of fundamental rights in administration
Role of Fundamental Rights in Administration
What Are Fundamental Rights?
Fundamental rights are basic human rights guaranteed by a constitution or legal system to protect individuals from arbitrary or unjust treatment by the state and ensure dignity, freedom, equality, and justice.
Why Are Fundamental Rights Important in Administration?
Administrative authorities exercise power affecting citizens’ lives (e.g., licenses, benefits, penalties).
Fundamental rights act as constraints on administrative power.
They ensure fairness, accountability, and respect for human dignity.
Protect individuals from arbitrariness, discrimination, and abuse by public officials.
Require administrative actions to comply with principles of due process, equality, and proportionality.
Key Principles Shaping Administration
Due Process/Natural Justice
Right to a fair hearing before adverse decisions.
Non-Arbitrariness and Reasonableness
Administrative decisions must be rational and based on relevant grounds.
Equality and Non-Discrimination
Equal treatment under similar circumstances.
Right to Privacy and Personal Liberty
Protection from unlawful searches, detention, or intrusion.
Right to Access Information and Remedy
Transparency and access to legal redress.
Detailed Explanation of Important Case Law on Fundamental Rights in Administration
Here are six important cases illustrating the integration of fundamental rights into administrative law:
1. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (AIR 1978 SC 597) – India
Background:
Maneka Gandhi’s passport was impounded without giving reasons or opportunity to be heard.
Ruling:
The Supreme Court held that any administrative action affecting personal liberty must follow due process, including a fair hearing and reasoned decision.
Significance:
Expanded Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) to include procedural fairness.
Administrative power is limited by fundamental rights.
Set precedent for fair administrative procedure.
2. Ridge v. Baldwin (1964) – UK
Background:
The Chief Constable was dismissed without a hearing.
Ruling:
The House of Lords ruled that natural justice applies to administrative decisions affecting rights or legitimate interests, requiring a fair hearing.
Significance:
Reinforced the principle of audi alteram partem (right to be heard).
Natural justice is a constitutional requirement in administration.
3. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985) – India
Background:
Eviction of pavement dwellers without adequate notice or rehabilitation.
Ruling:
The Supreme Court recognized the right to livelihood as part of the right to life, imposing duties on administration to act reasonably and protect fundamental rights.
Significance:
Administrative actions must balance state interests and fundamental rights.
Authorities cannot disregard social justice while enforcing law.
4. Golder v. United Kingdom (1975) – European Court of Human Rights
Background:
Prisoner denied permission to sue due to administrative rules.
Ruling:
The Court held that access to court is a fundamental right under Article 6 (fair trial), which administrative decisions cannot arbitrarily deny.
Significance:
Administration must respect judicial access rights.
Enhances accountability of administrative decisions.
5. Kharak Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1963) – India
Background:
Police surveillance without warrant or notice.
Ruling:
The Supreme Court held that the right to privacy is part of the right to personal liberty, limiting arbitrary administrative intrusions.
Significance:
Administrative surveillance must comply with constitutional safeguards.
Protects individuals from unwarranted administrative interference.
6. R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody (1994) – UK
Background:
Prisoners sought reasons for parole decisions.
Ruling:
The Court held that administrative decisions affecting rights require giving reasons to maintain fairness.
Significance:
Transparency and reason-giving are essential for administrative fairness.
Fundamental rights inform procedural standards.
Summary
Fundamental rights limit and guide administrative actions.
Administrative decisions must uphold fairness, reasonableness, equality, and respect for privacy.
Courts have expanded the scope of rights to include procedural fairness and access to justice in administration.
Decisions violating fundamental rights are subject to judicial review and invalidation.
Ensuring fundamental rights in administration strengthens democracy and rule of law.
RELATED Blog
0 comments