Role of statutory authorities in Bangladesh’s governance
I. What Are Statutory Authorities?
A statutory authority is a government body created by a statute (law enacted by Parliament) to carry out specific duties and functions. These bodies operate at arm’s length from the government and are tasked with regulatory, adjudicatory, administrative, or oversight responsibilities.
Examples in Bangladesh:
Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC)
Bangladesh Election Commission
Bangladesh Public Service Commission (PSC)
Bangladesh Telecommunication Regulatory Commission (BTRC)
University Grants Commission (UGC)
Human Rights Commission
Bangladesh Bank (in part governed by statute)
II. Constitutional and Legal Framework
A. Constitution of Bangladesh:
Article 7: Supremacy of the Constitution.
Article 55: Structure of the Cabinet.
Article 114–116: Judiciary and administrative justice.
Article 118: Election Commission.
Article 137–141: Public Service Commission.
These provisions enable the creation of statutory authorities to function independently in administering justice, ensuring fair elections, promoting good governance, and regulating sectors.
B. Statutory Acts:
Each authority is governed by an Act of Parliament, e.g.:
Anti-Corruption Commission Act, 2004
Telecommunication Act, 2001
Public Service Commission Ordinance, 1977
Right to Information Act, 2009
These acts define their powers, duties, appointments, tenure, independence, and accountability mechanisms.
III. Functions and Roles of Statutory Authorities
| Role | Description |
|---|---|
| Regulation | Supervise and regulate sectors like telecom, education, banking. |
| Adjudication | Resolve sectoral disputes (e.g., telecom disputes by BTRC). |
| Oversight | Monitor conduct of government agencies and public servants. |
| Policy Implementation | Implement government policies under legislative guidance. |
| Quasi-judicial Functions | Hear complaints and deliver decisions within their mandate. |
| Ensure Accountability | Prevent abuse of power and promote transparency (e.g., ACC). |
IV. Key Case Law on Statutory Authorities in Bangladesh
Let’s explore more than five landmark cases that define the legal boundaries, independence, and duties of statutory authorities in Bangladesh.
1. Dr. Mohiuddin Faroque v. Bangladesh (1997) 49 DLR (AD) 1
Issue:
Public interest litigation against a government action impacting the environment. The role of statutory environmental authorities was under scrutiny.
Holding:
The Appellate Division recognized that statutory authorities must act to protect public interest, and failure to do so may invoke judicial review.
Significance:
Affirmed that statutory authorities are accountable for inaction.
Public Interest Litigation (PIL) can compel them to perform statutory duties.
2. Secretary, Ministry of Finance v. Masdar Hossain (1999) 52 DLR (AD) 82
(The Separation of Judiciary Case)
Issue:
Whether the judiciary was sufficiently independent given executive control over the judicial service commission, a statutory authority.
Holding:
The Supreme Court held that statutory commissions related to judiciary must be independent of executive control.
Significance:
Cemented the idea of functional and institutional independence for statutory bodies.
Led to judicial separation from the executive in Bangladesh.
3. ACC v. Enayetur Rahman (2011) 63 DLR (AD) 1
Issue:
Challenge to the legality of the ACC's investigation authority and its autonomy.
Holding:
The Appellate Division upheld the independent investigative powers of the ACC and ruled that it need not obtain prior approval from the executive.
Significance:
Strengthened the ACC’s status as an independent statutory authority.
Reinforced that executive cannot interfere with its lawful duties.
4. Bangladesh Telecommunication Regulatory Commission v. Grameenphone Ltd., 66 DLR (AD) 205
Issue:
Dispute over BTRC's authority to impose fines on telecom operators.
Holding:
The court affirmed that BTRC, as a statutory body, has quasi-judicial powers but must act fairly and within statutory limits.
Significance:
Confirmed jurisdictional authority of regulatory bodies.
Asserted that they must operate within the bounds of natural justice and statute.
5. Mohammad Yunus v. Bangladesh, 63 DLR (HCD) 1
Issue:
Challenge to the legality of the removal of Dr. Yunus from Grameen Bank by the Bangladesh Bank.
Holding:
The court emphasized that statutory autonomy must be respected, but non-compliance with statutory rules can justify oversight.
Significance:
Highlighted the delicate balance between independence and accountability.
Even statutory autonomy has legal boundaries.
6. Engr. Md. Humayun Kabir v. Bangladesh Election Commission, 70 DLR (HCD) 170
Issue:
Whether the Election Commission (EC) acted lawfully in disqualifying a candidate.
Holding:
The High Court held that the EC must adhere strictly to statutory and constitutional provisions and ensure transparency.
Significance:
Reinforced neutrality and legality in the conduct of independent statutory bodies.
Election Commission decisions are subject to judicial review when rights are at stake.
7. Human Rights Forum v. Government of Bangladesh, Writ Petition No. 7460 of 2010
Issue:
Petition challenging the inaction of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) in addressing custodial torture.
Holding:
The Court observed that statutory bodies have a legal and moral obligation to act upon complaints within their jurisdiction.
Significance:
Criticized passivity of watchdog statutory authorities.
Strengthened the idea of proactive engagement in rights protection.
V. Judicial Review of Statutory Authorities
Actions and omissions of statutory authorities are subject to judicial review under Article 102 of the Constitution.
Courts ensure:
Compliance with statutory mandate
Adherence to natural justice
Avoidance of arbitrary or mala fide actions
However, courts respect institutional autonomy and do not interfere with policy unless unlawful or unreasonable.
VI. Challenges Facing Statutory Authorities in Bangladesh
Political interference – Undermines independence and credibility.
Budgetary dependence – Reduces operational autonomy.
Lack of transparency – Weakens public trust.
Inadequate legal enforcement power – Hinders implementation.
Delayed judicial resolution – Weakens effectiveness of oversight.
VII. Conclusion
Statutory authorities in Bangladesh are vital pillars of democratic governance, designed to operate independently from the executive while being accountable to law and the public. Their success depends on:
Strict compliance with enabling statutes
Institutional independence and integrity
Active judicial oversight to check excesses or inaction
Transparent and participatory decision-making
RELATED Blog
0 comments