Comparative study of Victorian FOI with federal FOI law
Comparative Study: Victorian FOI vs Federal FOI Law
Overview
| Aspect | Victorian FOI Act (Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic)) | Federal FOI Act (Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth)) |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | To give the public access to documents held by Victorian government agencies | To promote transparency and accountability by providing access to government documents at the Commonwealth level |
| Scope | Applies to Victorian government departments, agencies, and local councils | Applies to Australian Government departments, agencies, and certain statutory bodies |
| Exemptions | Exemptions based on privacy, Cabinet documents, law enforcement, security, etc. | Similar exemptions, with slight differences in scope and interpretation |
| Review Mechanisms | Internal review by agencies; external review by Victorian Information Commissioner and Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) | Internal review; external review by Information Commissioner and Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) |
| Time Limits for Decision | Generally 30 days | Generally 30 days |
| Charges | Agencies may charge reasonable fees | Charges for processing requests allowed, with some concessions |
Similarities
Both Acts promote transparency and public access.
Both provide for internal and external review processes.
Both contain broad exemptions to protect sensitive information.
Both Acts require timely responses (usually 30 days).
Both Acts impose obligations on agencies to assist applicants.
Differences
Jurisdiction: Victorian Act applies within the state; Federal Act applies to Commonwealth agencies.
Review Bodies: Victorian FOI disputes are often reviewed by VCAT; Federal FOI reviews go to AAT.
Exemptions: Federal FOI has slightly broader security and intelligence exemptions.
Charges: Federal FOI sometimes allows higher fees; Victorian Act limits fees more strictly.
Information Commissioner Role: Both have oversight bodies but different mandates and powers.
Case Laws Demonstrating FOI Principles and Differences
1. ABC v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd (2001) 208 CLR 199
Context:
Though primarily about privacy, this case influenced FOI law by addressing the balance between public interest and confidentiality in government-held information.
Significance:
Highlighted the need to balance privacy and public interest.
Influences interpretation of FOI exemptions in both Victorian and Federal law.
Interpretation:
FOI laws must carefully weigh competing interests, a principle applicable in both jurisdictions.
2. Attorney-General (Cth) v Cockcroft (1986) 65 ALR 193
Facts:
The Federal Court considered whether information was exempt under the Federal FOI Act.
Judgment:
Emphasized narrow interpretation of exemptions.
Held that exemption provisions should not be applied too broadly to frustrate the FOI’s purpose.
Relevance:
Sets a precedent for pro-disclosure interpretation in Federal FOI cases, influencing Victorian FOI decisions.
3. Victoria Police v Marke (2008) VCAT 1604
Facts:
Applicant sought access to police records; Victoria Police claimed exemptions under the Victorian FOI Act.
Judgment:
VCAT stressed the need to balance public interest in disclosure against privacy and law enforcement exemptions.
Applied a proportionality test to assess exemptions.
Relevance:
Shows Victorian FOI’s approach to exemptions and balancing interests, which is broadly consistent with Federal FOI jurisprudence.
4. Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd (2001) 208 CLR 199
Facts:
Case involved FOI issues around confidential government information and public interest.
Judgment:
High Court reinforced that public interest in transparency can override confidentiality claims.
Supported openness in government affairs under FOI.
Relevance:
Key to understanding the public interest test in FOI laws at both levels.
5. CFMEU v BHP Coal Pty Ltd (2009) VCAT 1127
Facts:
Application under Victorian FOI Act for access to workplace safety documents.
Judgment:
VCAT ordered disclosure emphasizing transparency in workplace safety.
Confirmed that exemptions should be applied restrictively.
Relevance:
Illustrates Victorian FOI’s practical enforcement and aligns with the federal approach to openness.
Summary of Comparative Insights
Both Victorian and Federal FOI laws share a strong commitment to transparency but operate in different jurisdictions.
Judicial interpretation in both arenas favors disclosure but respects legitimate exemptions.
Review mechanisms differ slightly but both promote fairness and accountability.
Key cases from both jurisdictions highlight the delicate balance between disclosure and protection of sensitive information.
Victorian FOI tends to have more localized focus, while Federal FOI covers broader national concerns, including security.
RELATED Blog
0 comments