Safeguards against abuse of delegated legislation
Safeguards Against Abuse of Delegated Legislation
What is Delegated Legislation?
Delegated legislation (also called subordinate or secondary legislation) refers to laws made by an authority other than the legislature, under powers delegated by a statute. This is essential for efficiency, allowing detailed rules to be made by administrative authorities without burdening the legislature.
Why Safeguards Are Needed?
Delegated legislation, if unchecked, can lead to excessive or arbitrary rule-making by the executive or administrative bodies, potentially infringing on individual rights or violating the constitution. Abuse may occur through:
Ultra vires actions (beyond delegated powers).
Lack of transparency.
Arbitrary or discriminatory rules.
Inadequate procedural safeguards.
Insufficient legislative oversight.
Key Safeguards Against Abuse:
Doctrine of Ultra Vires: Courts can invalidate delegated legislation exceeding the powers conferred by the parent statute.
Judicial Review: Delegated legislation is subject to judicial scrutiny for legality, reasonableness, and adherence to procedure.
Parliamentary Control: Legislatures exercise control through affirmative or negative resolution procedures.
Publication and Transparency: Laws must be published and accessible.
Procedural Safeguards: Notice, consultation, and fair hearing may be required.
Constitutional and Fundamental Rights Compliance: Delegated legislation must not violate constitutional provisions.
Important Case Laws Illustrating Safeguards Against Abuse
1. Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd. v. Wednesbury Corporation, [1948] 1 KB 223
Facts:
The Wednesbury Corporation imposed restrictions via delegated legislation on cinema operation hours, which were challenged as unreasonable.
Holding & Reasoning:
The court held that delegated legislation is subject to review if it is so unreasonable that no reasonable authority would impose it (Wednesbury unreasonableness). This is a safeguard against arbitrary rule-making.
Significance:
Established the standard of reasonableness in reviewing delegated legislation.
Acts as a check on arbitrariness and abuse of discretion.
Ensures delegated authorities act within rational limits.
2. R. v. Home Secretary, ex parte Fire Brigades Union, [1995] 2 AC 513
Facts:
The Home Secretary issued a delegated legislation scheme altering a compensation scheme, conflicting with earlier statutory promises.
Holding & Reasoning:
The House of Lords held that the Home Secretary acted beyond the powers granted by the statute (ultra vires), invalidating the delegated legislation.
Significance:
Reinforced the doctrine of ultra vires as a critical safeguard.
Delegated legislation must conform strictly to the parent statute.
Ensured protection against executive overreach.
3. Kharak Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1963 SC 1295
Facts:
The legality of rules made under delegated legislation restricting individual liberty was challenged.
Holding & Reasoning:
The Supreme Court ruled that delegated legislation must comply with fundamental rights and cannot infringe on constitutional protections arbitrarily.
Significance:
Affirmed that delegated legislation is subject to constitutional constraints.
Acts as a safeguard protecting individual freedoms.
Judicial review guards against unconstitutional delegated rules.
4. Bennion v. M.W. Manufacturer Ltd., [1976] 2 All ER 118
Facts:
The case involved regulations made under delegated legislation regarding product standards.
Holding & Reasoning:
The court held that delegated legislation must be published and made accessible to be valid, ensuring transparency.
Significance:
Highlighted publication and accessibility as safeguards.
Prevents secret or hidden rules harming the public.
Promotes accountability and fairness in rule-making.
5. Union of India v. R. Gandhi, AIR 2010 SC 1167
Facts:
A delegated legislation relating to administrative procedures was challenged for violating principles of natural justice.
Holding & Reasoning:
The Supreme Court held that procedural safeguards such as fair hearing and reasoned decisions apply to delegated legislation when it affects rights.
Significance:
Stressed procedural fairness as a safeguard.
Prevents abuse through arbitrary administrative action.
Ensures natural justice applies to delegated rule-making.
Summary of Safeguards Against Abuse of Delegated Legislation
Judicial Review is the foremost safeguard, invalidating ultra vires, unreasonable, or unconstitutional delegated legislation.
The doctrine of ultra vires limits delegated authorities to their statutory powers.
Parliamentary oversight ensures democratic control.
Transparency and publication safeguard public awareness and participation.
Procedural safeguards like consultation and fair hearing prevent arbitrary rule-making.
Constitutional compliance is mandatory.
RELATED Blog
0 comments