Relationship between Administrative and Constitutional Law
✅ Relationship Between Administrative Law and Constitutional Law
🔹 Introduction
Constitutional law and administrative law are two key branches of public law. While they are distinct, they are also interconnected in significant ways. Both deal with the organization and functioning of the state, the exercise of public power, and the protection of individual rights.
🔹 Definitions
🟩 Constitutional Law:
Governs the structure, powers, and functions of government organs (Legislature, Executive, Judiciary).
It establishes fundamental rights of citizens and the doctrine of separation of powers.
It is the supreme law—all other laws derive authority from the Constitution.
🟩 Administrative Law:
Regulates the daily functioning of administrative agencies and public authorities.
It deals with rule-making, enforcement, adjudication, and judicial review of administrative actions.
It ensures accountability and legality in governance.
🔹 Core Relationship
| Aspect | Constitutional Law | Administrative Law |
|---|---|---|
| Source of Power | Grants the structure and power to the state and its organs | Operates within the framework set by the Constitution |
| Function | Lays down fundamental principles | Deals with practical implementation |
| Rights | Guarantees fundamental rights | Ensures administrative actions do not violate these rights |
| Judicial Role | Constitutional courts enforce supremacy of Constitution | Courts supervise legality of administrative action |
| Doctrine | Rule of law, separation of powers, federalism, etc. | Natural justice, reasonableness, proportionality, etc. |
🔸 Thus, Administrative Law is subordinate to Constitutional Law, and derives legitimacy from it.
🔹 Key Doctrines Linking Both Fields
Rule of Law – Rooted in constitutional law but enforced through administrative mechanisms.
Natural Justice – Applied in administrative procedures, derived from constitutional principles of fairness.
Judicial Review – A constitutional function applied to review administrative action.
Separation of Powers – Defines limits of administrative authority.
✅ Landmark Case Laws (More Than 5) Showing the Relationship
🔹 Case 1: A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950)
Facts: Detention under the Preventive Detention Act was challenged as a violation of fundamental rights under Articles 19 and 21.
Issue: Can administrative detention override fundamental rights?
Judgment: The Supreme Court held that as long as a law is valid under Article 21, it need not be tested under Article 19.
Significance: Early restrictive interpretation. Later overruled by Maneka Gandhi. Highlighted the tension between administrative power and constitutional freedoms.
🔹 Case 2: Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978)
Facts: Maneka Gandhi’s passport was impounded by the government without giving her a reason or a hearing.
Issue: Did this violate her fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19, and 21?
Judgment: Supreme Court held that procedure under Article 21 must be just, fair, and reasonable, and not arbitrary.
Significance: Revolutionized the interpretation of Article 21; established that administrative decisions must conform to constitutional standards of fairness and non-arbitrariness.
Relationship: Brought administrative action squarely under the umbrella of constitutional scrutiny.
🔹 Case 3: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)
Facts: Challenge to the 29th Amendment and extent of Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution.
Issue: Could Parliament alter fundamental rights and constitutional structure?
Judgment: Supreme Court upheld the Basic Structure Doctrine—even constitutional amendments are subject to limitations.
Significance: Administrative powers must operate within the basic structure, such as rule of law, judicial review, separation of powers.
Relationship: Draws a line between constitutional supremacy and administrative functioning.
🔹 Case 4: R.D. Shetty v. International Airport Authority (1979)
Facts: A contract was denied despite the applicant meeting eligibility criteria.
Issue: Can a government body deny rights arbitrarily?
Judgment: Yes, even a statutory corporation is State under Article 12, and must act fairly and reasonably.
Significance: Administrative discretion is not absolute, and must conform to constitutional values like equality under Article 14.
Relationship: Connects constitutional rights to administrative conduct.
🔹 Case 5: BCCI v. Cricket Association of Bihar (2015)
Facts: BCCI’s actions were challenged for lack of transparency and fairness.
Issue: Is BCCI a “State” under Article 12?
Judgment: Held not a State, but since it performs public functions, it is subject to constitutional principles.
Significance: Administrative entities, even if private, must adhere to constitutional norms when performing public duties.
Relationship: Demonstrates how constitutional oversight can apply to administrative bodies based on function rather than form.
🔹 Case 6: Union of India v. Tulsiram Patel (1985)
Facts: Dismissal of government servants without inquiry under Article 311(2), citing national security.
Issue: Can administrative rules bypass principles of natural justice?
Judgment: Court held natural justice is flexible, and in exceptional situations, may be excluded.
Significance: Shows how constitutional provisions guide the limits of administrative discretion.
Relationship: Illustrates balance between constitutional guarantees and practical governance.
🔹 Case 7: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975)
Facts: Election of the Prime Minister was challenged; Parliament passed laws to validate it retroactively.
Issue: Can Parliament interfere with judicial decisions via administrative or legislative action?
Judgment: Held that judicial independence is part of the basic structure, and cannot be undermined by administrative or legislative action.
Significance: Reinforced the supremacy of constitutional principles over administrative expediency.
Relationship: Strong line between constitutional supremacy and limited administrative power.
✅ Key Takeaways
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Supremacy of Constitution | All administrative actions must conform to the Constitution. |
| Judicial Review | A tool developed in administrative law but rooted in the Constitution to check abuse of power. |
| Natural Justice | Applied in administrative procedures; derived from Articles 14 & 21. |
| Rule of Law | A fundamental principle in both administrative and constitutional law. |
| State under Article 12 | Broad interpretation brings administrative authorities under constitutional scrutiny. |
✅ Conclusion
While constitutional law lays the foundation of the state, administrative law ensures the day-to-day running of government functions in accordance with constitutional principles.
The relationship is:
Interdependent: Administrative law cannot function outside the boundaries of constitutional law.
Complementary: Constitutional values guide administrative action; administrative law ensures constitutional rights are protected in implementation.
Guarded by Judiciary: Courts maintain this balance through interpretation and review.
RELATED Blog
0 comments