Sources of administrative law in Finland
Sources of Administrative Law in Finland: Overview
Finnish administrative law governs the relationship between administrative authorities and individuals, ensuring legality, transparency, and fairness in public administration. The sources of administrative law in Finland are diverse and include both formal legal sources and principles derived from constitutional and international law.
Primary Sources of Finnish Administrative Law
The Constitution of Finland (1999)
The supreme law laying down fundamental rights and the framework for government and administration.
Contains provisions on the legality of public administration, the right to good administration, and procedural guarantees.
Statutes and Acts of Parliament
Detailed laws enacted by Parliament governing specific administrative procedures and authorities (e.g., the Administrative Procedure Act, the Act on the Openness of Government Activities).
Government Decrees and Regulations
Secondary legislation issued by the Government or ministries based on statutory powers to implement laws.
Case Law of the Supreme Administrative Court (SAC)
The SAC’s interpretations of statutes, principles of legality, and procedural requirements form important precedents.
International Treaties and EU Law
Finland is bound by international treaties and EU regulations, which have supremacy over national law in certain areas, influencing administrative law.
General Principles of Administrative Law
Principles such as legality, proportionality, impartiality, and good administration derived from legislation and jurisprudence.
Detailed Case Law Examples
1. Supreme Administrative Court, KHO 1995:90
Issue: Interpretation of procedural fairness in administrative decisions.
Facts: The case concerned a municipal decision affecting an individual’s property rights without adequate notice or opportunity to be heard.
Holding: The SAC emphasized the constitutional right to be heard (audi alteram partem) as a fundamental procedural safeguard.
Significance:
Reaffirms the principle of procedural fairness as a constitutional requirement.
Establishes that administrative decisions must be preceded by adequate opportunity for parties to present their case.
2. Supreme Administrative Court, KHO 2004:67
Issue: Application of proportionality principle in administrative sanctions.
Facts: A business was penalized for a minor regulatory breach with a severe fine.
Holding: The Court ruled the sanction disproportionate and ordered a reduction.
Significance:
Demonstrates the proportionality principle as a key source guiding administrative discretion.
Ensures sanctions are fair and balanced relative to the offense.
3. Supreme Administrative Court, KHO 2010:45
Issue: Administrative transparency and public access to documents.
Facts: A citizen requested access to government-held information which was initially denied.
Holding: The SAC reinforced the right to information based on the Act on the Openness of Government Activities, emphasizing transparency.
Significance:
Highlights the statutory source protecting public access to information.
Supports democratic governance through administrative openness.
4. Supreme Administrative Court, KHO 2016:78
Issue: Conflict between national administrative law and EU regulations.
Facts: A Finnish agency refused to implement an EU regulation citing national law.
Holding: The SAC held that EU law takes precedence, requiring the agency to comply.
Significance:
Demonstrates the role of EU law as a source impacting Finnish administrative law.
Affirms the supremacy of international legal obligations over national rules.
5. Constitutional Law Committee of the Finnish Parliament Opinion (2018)
Issue: Constitutional limits on administrative data collection and privacy.
Summary: The Committee reviewed a draft law regulating administrative data systems, emphasizing protection of privacy rights under the Constitution and international human rights treaties.
Significance:
Illustrates how constitutional provisions and international obligations serve as guiding sources.
Ensures administrative law respects fundamental rights in data governance.
Summary
Finnish administrative law derives from the Constitution, statutes, decrees, case law, international treaties, and general legal principles.
The Supreme Administrative Court plays a crucial role in interpreting and applying these sources.
Principles such as procedural fairness, proportionality, transparency, and respect for EU law are central.
International law, especially EU law, has significant influence and may override national laws.
Constitutional safeguards ensure administrative law aligns with fundamental rights and democratic governance.
RELATED Blog
0 comments