Judicial development of administrative doctrines
Judicial Development of Administrative Doctrines
Administrative law governs the activities of administrative agencies of government. It regulates the powers, procedures, and duties of administrative authorities and ensures that their actions comply with the law.
Judicial development of administrative doctrines refers to the evolution of legal principles by courts, which guide and control administrative actions, ensuring fairness, reasonableness, and accountability.
Key Administrative Doctrines Developed by Courts
1. Doctrine of Natural Justice (Audi Alteram Partem & Nemo Judex in Causa Sua)
Explanation:
This doctrine requires that administrative authorities must:
Give a person a fair hearing before taking any action affecting their rights (audi alteram partem).
Avoid bias or conflict of interest in decision-making (nemo judex in causa sua).
Case Law: Rameshwar Prasad v. Union of India (2006)
The Supreme Court emphasized that even in administrative decisions, natural justice is a fundamental requirement.
The Court held that denial of a fair hearing is a violation of Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty).
2. Doctrine of Reasonableness and Proportionality
Explanation:
Administrative decisions must be reasonable, not arbitrary or capricious. Proportionality ensures that the administrative action is balanced and not excessive compared to the objective sought.
Case Law: Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978)
The Court introduced the principle of reasonableness in administrative decisions.
It held that any restriction on personal liberty must be “right, just and fair” and not arbitrary.
Case Law: State of West Bengal v. Anwar Ali Sarkar (1952)
The Court struck down an arbitrary law, reinforcing that administrative acts must be reasonable.
3. Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation
Explanation:
When an administrative authority creates a legitimate expectation (through past practices, promises, or rules), it must act consistently and not frustrate those expectations unfairly.
Case Law: Secretary, Ministry of Aviation v. Chandra Sekhar (AIR 1977 SC 851)
The Supreme Court held that if a legitimate expectation is created, the authority must honor it or provide a fair hearing before changing the position.
4. Doctrine of Ultra Vires
Explanation:
If an administrative authority acts beyond the powers conferred by the statute (either in terms of scope or procedure), its actions are invalid as “ultra vires” (beyond powers).
Case Law: A.K. Roy v. Union of India (1982)
The Court held that administrative actions without legal authority are void.
The doctrine limits administrative discretion strictly within legal boundaries.
5. Doctrine of Severability
Explanation:
If parts of a statute or administrative order are found unconstitutional or illegal, only those parts are invalidated while the rest remain effective if separable.
Case Law: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)
The Supreme Court applied severability in constitutional amendments, allowing parts to stand and others to fall.
This doctrine is useful in administrative law to preserve valid provisions.
6. Doctrine of Delegated Legislation
Explanation:
Legislatures often delegate law-making powers to administrative agencies. Courts control this power to prevent misuse.
Case Law: A.K. Roy v. Union of India (1982)
The Court asserted that delegated legislation must be within the limits of authority and must not be arbitrary or unreasonable.
7. Doctrine of Fairness
Explanation:
Administrative actions must be fair and just, involving procedural fairness and respect for individual rights.
Case Law: Shamsher Singh v. State of Punjab (1974)
The Court stressed the need for fairness in disciplinary proceedings.
This applies broadly in administrative adjudications.
8. Doctrine of Accountability and Transparency
Explanation:
Administrative authorities must be accountable for their decisions and transparent in functioning.
Case Law: Aruna Ramachandra Shanbaug v. Union of India (2011)
Although primarily about euthanasia, the Court emphasized transparent and accountable administrative processes.
The doctrine supports access to information and participative governance.
Summary Table of Doctrines and Cases
| Doctrine | Explanation | Key Case |
|---|---|---|
| Natural Justice | Fair hearing, no bias | Rameshwar Prasad v. Union of India |
| Reasonableness & Proportionality | Actions must be fair, balanced | Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India |
| Legitimate Expectation | Honoring promises or past practices | Secretary, Ministry of Aviation v. Chandra Sekhar |
| Ultra Vires | Action beyond legal powers invalid | A.K. Roy v. Union of India |
| Severability | Invalid parts of law separated | Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala |
| Delegated Legislation | Control on delegated law-making | A.K. Roy v. Union of India |
| Fairness | Justice and equity in administrative action | Shamsher Singh v. State of Punjab |
| Accountability & Transparency | Responsibility and openness in administration | Aruna Ramachandra Shanbaug v. Union of India |
RELATED Blog
0 comments