Social justice and administrative law
Social Justice and Administrative Law: Overview
Social Justice refers to the concept of creating a fair and equal society by addressing inequalities related to wealth, opportunities, privileges, and rights. It often focuses on marginalized groups, ensuring they receive equitable treatment and access to resources.
Administrative Law governs the activities of administrative agencies of government. It deals with the decision-making of these agencies and ensures they act fairly, reasonably, and within their legal authority. Administrative law ensures that the actions of government bodies do not violate principles of justice, including social justice.
How Administrative Law Supports Social Justice
Protection of Rights: Administrative law protects citizens from arbitrary or discriminatory decisions by public authorities.
Access to Justice: Administrative tribunals and bodies provide accessible forums for marginalized groups.
Promoting Equality: Laws and policies can be enforced to ensure equitable distribution of resources.
Accountability: Ensures government bodies are held accountable for unjust actions.
Important Cases Linking Social Justice and Administrative Law
1. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) - India
Facts: Maneka Gandhi’s passport was impounded by the government without giving reasons.
Issue: Whether the action violated her fundamental right to personal liberty under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.
Held: The Supreme Court ruled that the procedure established by law must be “just, fair, and reasonable.” This widened the scope of due process, emphasizing that administrative decisions affecting personal liberty must be fair and transparent.
Significance: This case expanded administrative law principles by protecting individual rights against arbitrary administrative action, reinforcing social justice by ensuring fairness and equality before law.
2. Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd. v. Wednesbury Corporation (1948) - UK
Facts: The local authority imposed conditions on a cinema license to prevent children from attending shows on Sundays.
Issue: Whether the decision was lawful and reasonable.
Held: The court introduced the concept of "Wednesbury unreasonableness," where a decision is so unreasonable that no reasonable authority could have made it.
Significance: This principle is crucial in administrative law to prevent irrational decisions by public authorities that could undermine social justice, ensuring government decisions must be reasonable and not arbitrary.
3. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985) - India
Facts: The Bombay Municipal Corporation attempted to evict pavement dwellers, affecting their right to livelihood.
Issue: Whether the right to livelihood is part of the right to life under Article 21.
Held: The Supreme Court held that the right to livelihood is an integral part of the right to life, and the eviction must be justified with adequate alternatives or rehabilitation.
Significance: This case links social justice and administrative law by protecting vulnerable groups (slum dwellers), ensuring administrative decisions do not infringe on fundamental rights without reasonable justification.
4. R (on the application of Daly) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (2001) - UK
Facts: A prison policy allowed officers to search prisoners’ cells and read legal correspondence.
Issue: Whether this violated the prisoners’ rights to privacy and legal correspondence.
Held: The House of Lords held that any interference with fundamental rights must be proportionate and justified, introducing the principle of proportionality in administrative actions.
Significance: This case safeguards social justice by ensuring administrative actions respect individual rights, especially for vulnerable populations like prisoners.
5. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) - India
Facts: The petitioner challenged amendments to the Constitution that restricted property rights.
Issue: Whether Parliament had unlimited power to amend the Constitution.
Held: The Supreme Court ruled that Parliament cannot alter the “basic structure” of the Constitution, including fundamental rights.
Significance: This landmark case ensures social justice principles embedded in fundamental rights are protected from arbitrary administrative or legislative changes, maintaining a balance of power.
Summary:
Administrative law acts as a check on governmental power, ensuring decisions promote social justice.
The principles of fairness, reasonableness, and proportionality are critical.
Courts have often intervened to protect vulnerable groups and safeguard fundamental rights.
Cases like Maneka Gandhi, Olga Tellis, and Kesavananda Bharati showcase how law supports social equity.
UK cases like Wednesbury and Daly provide foundational principles controlling administrative discretion.
RELATED Blog
0 comments