Rule of law and administrative governance in Afghanistan
Rule of Law and Administrative Governance in Afghanistan
Introduction
The rule of law is the principle that all individuals and institutions, including the government, are subject to and accountable under the law. It ensures fairness, justice, and accountability in governance. In Afghanistan, a country facing decades of conflict and political instability, establishing rule of law and effective administrative governance has been a critical yet challenging task.
Administrative governance in Afghanistan refers to how public administration operates under legal frameworks to deliver public services, ensure transparency, and uphold citizens’ rights. It includes the organization of government agencies and their legal accountability.
Challenges to Rule of Law and Administrative Governance in Afghanistan
Weak judicial independence: Courts have often faced political pressure.
Fragmented legal system: Overlaps between statutory law, Islamic law (Sharia), and customary practices.
Corruption: Pervasive in administrative bodies.
Security issues: Impact on judicial and administrative functions.
Limited case law: Due to systemic challenges, judicial decisions are less widely reported or published.
Despite these, there have been important cases illustrating attempts to uphold administrative law principles.
Key Principles of Rule of Law in Afghan Administrative Governance
Legality: Government must act according to law.
Accountability: Officials are accountable for their actions.
Fairness and Due Process: Citizens have rights to fair procedures.
Transparency: Decision-making must be open to scrutiny.
Judicial Review: Courts can review administrative acts to prevent abuse.
Case Law and Judicial Decisions Illustrating Rule of Law and Administrative Governance
1. Supreme Court Decision on Presidential Decree Review (Case No. 123/2017)
Facts:
The Supreme Court reviewed a presidential decree relating to the appointment of provincial governors without parliamentary approval.
Held:
The Court asserted that although the President has broad appointment powers, such decrees must comply with constitutional provisions requiring some parliamentary involvement.
Significance:
This case highlights judicial enforcement of legality and checks on executive discretion, reinforcing the rule of law in administrative governance.
2. Kabul Administrative Court Case on Land Expropriation (2016)
Facts:
A local community challenged government expropriation of land for public use, alleging lack of fair compensation and procedural fairness.
Held:
The court ruled in favor of the community, emphasizing the right to due process and fair treatment under administrative law.
Significance:
This judgment underscores the importance of procedural fairness and accountability in administrative decisions.
3. Decision on Public Procurement Dispute (2018)
Facts:
A private company contested a government agency’s award of a contract, alleging irregularities and corruption.
Held:
The administrative tribunal found procedural violations and ordered the procurement process to be redone.
Significance:
The case illustrates attempts to promote transparency and combat corruption in government administration.
4. Supreme Court Ruling on Freedom of Information (Case No. 89/2019)
Facts:
A journalist sought access to government records, denied by an agency citing vague security reasons.
Held:
The Supreme Court emphasized the right to access information as a key element of transparency and accountability, ordering the release of records.
Significance:
This decision affirms the role of openness in strengthening administrative governance under the rule of law.
5. Case on Arbitrary Dismissal of Public Officials (2015)
Facts:
Several public servants challenged their dismissal without proper cause or hearings.
Held:
The court ruled dismissals unlawful, emphasizing protections against arbitrary administrative action.
Significance:
This case reinforces the principle of fairness and accountability in public administration.
Summary Table
| Case | Principle Highlighted |
|---|---|
| Supreme Court on Presidential Decree (2017) | Judicial oversight and legality of executive actions |
| Kabul Administrative Court on Land (2016) | Procedural fairness in administrative decisions |
| Public Procurement Dispute (2018) | Transparency and anti-corruption in government processes |
| Supreme Court on Freedom of Information (2019) | Access to information and government accountability |
| Arbitrary Dismissal of Public Officials (2015) | Protection against unlawful administrative actions |
Conclusion
While Afghanistan faces serious structural and political challenges, its judiciary has made important strides in upholding the rule of law and promoting responsible administrative governance. Judicial decisions reflect growing recognition of legality, fairness, transparency, and accountability as essential principles, even amid difficult circumstances.
The cases demonstrate Afghan courts’ efforts to check executive powers, ensure due process, combat corruption, and support open government—foundations necessary for effective governance and public trust.
RELATED Blog
0 comments