Administrative law and peace-building role
Administrative Law and Peace-Building
1. Introduction: Administrative Law and Peace-Building
Peace-building refers to activities and processes aimed at resolving conflict, establishing lasting peace, and rebuilding societies affected by violence or instability.
Administrative law—the law governing the functioning of public administration and executive agencies—plays a critical role in peace-building by:
Ensuring rule of law and accountability of state actors.
Protecting fundamental rights of individuals, especially in post-conflict zones.
Regulating the administration of transitional justice and reconstruction.
Preventing abuse of power by administrative agencies.
Providing mechanisms for redress and grievance in fragile societies.
2. Key Functions of Administrative Law in Peace-Building
Legal Framework for Transitional Governance: Establishing laws and institutions that guide the transition from conflict to peace.
Protection of Human Rights: Ensuring administrative bodies uphold constitutional guarantees.
Fair Public Administration: Preventing arbitrary use of power and corruption.
Regulation of Security Forces: Controlling powers of police and military during volatile periods.
Facilitating Social Reconciliation: Ensuring fair access to justice and public services.
Ensuring Participation and Transparency: Involving citizens in governance processes.
3. Case Law Illustrations: Role of Administrative Law in Peace-Building
Here are more than five important case laws from different jurisdictions (mainly India and other countries with relevant administrative law developments) illustrating the peace-building role of administrative law.
Case 1: People’s Union for Democratic Rights v. Union of India (1982)
Issue: Rights of marginalized groups and state accountability in administrative actions.
Details:
The Supreme Court held that administrative authorities must not deny fundamental rights such as livelihood and access to services, especially to vulnerable populations.
Significance: This decision ensured administrative bodies act fairly to protect social peace and prevent marginalization, crucial in divided societies.
Peace-building Role: Supports social cohesion by preventing administrative discrimination.
Case 2: Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)
Issue: Doctrine of Basic Structure and constitutional supremacy over administrative actions.
Details:
The Supreme Court emphasized that administrative actions must conform to the constitutional framework.
Significance: This principle prevents arbitrary governance and ensures legal stability.
Peace-building Role: Strengthens rule of law, which is foundational to lasting peace.
Case 3: Lautsi v. Italy (European Court of Human Rights, 2011)
Issue: Administrative decisions relating to religious symbols in public schools and minority rights.
Details:
The Court ruled that state administration must balance majority rights and minority protections carefully.
Significance: Administrative decisions must respect pluralism to avoid social tensions.
Peace-building Role: Promotes tolerance and prevents communal conflict through balanced administration.
Case 4: Al-Jedda v. United Kingdom (European Court of Human Rights, 2011)
Issue: Detention by administrative authorities in conflict zones without trial.
Details:
The court ruled that even in emergencies, administrative detentions must respect human rights norms.
Significance: Limits arbitrary administrative power in fragile peace contexts.
Peace-building Role: Prevents abuses that can reignite conflict.
Case 5: Tanzania Railways Corporation v. Maluka (East African Court of Justice, 2015)
Issue: Administrative decisions impacting employment rights post-conflict.
Details:
Court emphasized fair administrative procedures in restructuring public services.
Significance: Promotes trust in administration during sensitive recovery phases.
Peace-building Role: Ensures social stability by safeguarding rights in administrative reforms.
Case 6: State of Jammu & Kashmir v. Triloki Nath Khosa (1981)
Issue: Preventing abuse of power by administrative agencies in disturbed regions.
Details:
Supreme Court ruled that administrative detention without due process is illegal.
Significance: Upholds fundamental rights even during internal security operations.
Peace-building Role: Protects against state excesses that fuel unrest.
Case 7: Centre for Minority Rights Development v. Kenya (African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, 2013)
Issue: Administrative neglect of minority land rights contributing to conflict.
Details:
Commission condemned administrative failure to protect indigenous peoples.
Significance: Administrative recognition of rights is essential to peace.
Peace-building Role: Prevents conflict by ensuring fair governance.
4. Summary: How Administrative Law Supports Peace-Building
| Peace-Building Aspect | Role of Administrative Law |
|---|---|
| Rule of Law | Limits arbitrary power, enforces constitutionality |
| Protection of Rights | Guards minority and individual rights from administrative abuse |
| Accountability of Officials | Judicial review and remedies against unlawful actions |
| Transparency and Participation | Encourages citizen involvement to legitimize governance |
| Transitional Justice | Framework for dealing with past abuses through legal means |
| Prevention of Abuse in Security | Regulates use of force by police and military |
5. Conclusion
Administrative law is an indispensable tool in peace-building efforts, providing the legal foundation for fair governance, protection of rights, and accountability. The cases above show that effective administrative regulation helps build trust between the state and citizens, prevents abuses that could reignite conflict, and promotes social harmony.
RELATED Blog
0 comments