Develop and present an appropriately structured and supported legal argument
Developing and Presenting a Legal Argument
What is a Legal Argument?
A legal argument is a reasoned presentation based on law and facts, advocating for a particular interpretation or conclusion.
It involves applying legal principles to facts to convince the court or decision-maker.
Structure of a Legal Argument
Issue Identification:
Clearly state the legal question or issue.
Example: "Whether the defendant’s actions constitute breach of contract under Section X of the Contract Act?"
Rule of Law:
State the relevant legal principles, statutes, or precedents.
Example: "Under Section X, breach occurs if party fails to perform agreed terms without lawful excuse."
Application/Analysis:
Apply the law to the facts at hand.
Analyze how the facts meet or fail the legal standards.
Discuss supporting case law or statutes.
Counter-Arguments:
Anticipate opposing views and address them.
Explain why they do not undermine your position.
Conclusion:
Summarize the argument and clearly state the desired legal outcome.
Tips for Effective Legal Arguments
Use precise legal language and avoid ambiguity.
Support arguments with authoritative case law and statutes.
Maintain logical flow and coherence.
Reference facts clearly and relate them directly to legal principles.
Be concise but thorough.
Case Laws Illustrating Effective Legal Argumentation
1. Donoghue vs. Stevenson (1932) (UK Case)
Issue: Whether the manufacturer owed a duty of care to the ultimate consumer.
Legal Principle: Established the modern concept of negligence and duty of care.
Argument Development: The plaintiff’s lawyer argued that the manufacturer must foresee harm to consumers.
Judgment: The House of Lords accepted the “neighbour principle,” holding a duty of care existed.
Importance: Showcases how defining a clear legal principle supported by facts creates persuasive argumentation.
2. Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Kerala (1973)
Issue: Whether Parliament can amend the basic structure of the Constitution.
Legal Principle: Basic structure doctrine limits constitutional amendments.
Argument Development: Petitioners argued amendments violated the Constitution’s core principles.
Judgment: Supreme Court held Parliament cannot alter the basic structure.
Importance: Demonstrates complex argumentation involving constitutional interpretation, balancing competing legal principles.
3. R v. R (1991) (UK Case)
Issue: Whether a husband can be guilty of raping his wife.
Legal Principle: Marital rape exemption abolished.
Argument Development: The prosecution argued changing societal norms require reinterpreting common law.
Judgment: Court held that non-consensual sex within marriage is a crime.
Importance: Shows how legal arguments can evolve with societal changes and be supported by policy considerations.
4. Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India (2015)
Issue: Constitutionality of Section 66A of the IT Act restricting online speech.
Legal Principle: Freedom of speech under Article 19(1)(a).
Argument Development: Petitioners argued Section 66A was vague, overbroad, and violated free speech.
Judgment: Supreme Court struck down Section 66A.
Importance: Illustrates use of constitutional rights and detailed analysis of statutory language in argumentation.
5. Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India (1978)
Issue: Whether the right to travel abroad can be restricted arbitrarily.
Legal Principle: Due process under Article 21 (Right to life and personal liberty).
Argument Development: The petitioner argued the government violated due process by impounding passport without fair hearing.
Judgment: Supreme Court expanded the scope of Article 21 to include due process.
Importance: Shows how argumentation can broaden constitutional protections through detailed reasoning.
Summary
Effective legal argumentation requires clear identification of issues, accurate statement of law, and logical application to facts.
Supporting arguments with authoritative case law strengthens persuasiveness.
Addressing counterarguments enhances credibility.
The cases above demonstrate various facets: constitutional law, torts, criminal law, and fundamental rights — all relying on strong legal argumentation.
RELATED Blog
0 comments