A critical analysis of the application of the principle of rule of law in lndia
Critical Analysis of the Application of the Principle of Rule of Law in India
1. Introduction: Understanding the Rule of Law
The Rule of Law is a fundamental constitutional principle that mandates:
All individuals and institutions, including the government, are subject to and accountable under the law.
No one is above the law; laws must be clear, public, stable, and apply equally.
Protection of fundamental rights.
Absence of arbitrariness, ensuring fairness and justice.
It is essential for constitutional democracy, good governance, and protection of liberties.
2. Theoretical Foundations in India
The Indian Constitution implicitly embraces the Rule of Law through:
Article 14 (Equality before law),
Article 21 (Right to life and personal liberty with due process),
Judicial review provisions (Articles 32 and 226),
Separation of powers,
Fundamental rights safeguards.
The Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized Rule of Law as a part of the Basic Structure Doctrine.
3. Critical Analysis: Application in India
Strengths:
(a) Judicial Enforcement and Protection of Fundamental Rights
Courts have played an active role in ensuring that executive and legislative actions conform to the Rule of Law.
Judicial review acts as a strong safeguard against arbitrary use of power.
(b) Equality Before Law and Non-Arbitrariness
Article 14 prevents discriminatory or arbitrary treatment by the state.
Several judgments have reinforced that fair procedure is mandatory before deprivation of life, liberty, or property.
(c) Constitutionalism and Basic Structure
The Supreme Court’s Basic Structure Doctrine restricts parliament from amending fundamental aspects including Rule of Law, ensuring stability and protection of constitutionalism.
Challenges:
(a) Executive Arbitrariness and Delays
In practice, there are instances of executive actions that defy legal norms — arbitrary arrests, misuse of power, or denial of rights.
Delays in justice undermine Rule of Law by denying effective remedies.
(b) Access to Justice
Judicial processes are often slow and expensive, limiting access to justice for marginalized groups.
Backlog and pendency challenge the timely enforcement of Rule of Law.
(c) Political Interference and Weak Enforcement
Law enforcement and administrative agencies sometimes act under political influence.
Selective application of law in certain high-profile cases raises concerns about equality before the law.
4. Landmark Case Laws Illustrating Rule of Law in India
1. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248
Significance: Expanded the scope of Article 21 (Right to Life and Liberty) to include the principle of fairness, reasonableness, and non-arbitrariness.
Rule of Law Impact: Executive action affecting personal liberty must be just, fair, and reasonable, ensuring no arbitrary deprivation.
2. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) 4 SCC 225
Significance: Established the Basic Structure Doctrine, including Rule of Law as an inviolable feature of the Constitution.
Rule of Law Impact: Parliament cannot amend constitutional provisions that threaten the Rule of Law, ensuring constitutional supremacy.
3. A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India (1969) 2 SCC 262
Significance: Held that administrative actions must comply with natural justice and cannot be arbitrary or biased.
Rule of Law Impact: Administrative fairness and rule-bound decision-making are essential components of Rule of Law.
4. ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976) 2 SCC 521 (The Habeas Corpus Case)
Significance: The Supreme Court controversially upheld the suspension of fundamental rights during Emergency, allowing arbitrary detention.
Rule of Law Impact: This case reflected a serious setback in the application of Rule of Law; later judicial pronouncements have criticized and repudiated this decision.
5. S.P. Gupta v. Union of India (1981) Supp. SCC 87 (Judges Transfer Case)
Significance: Reinforced judicial independence and transparency in the appointment of judges.
Rule of Law Impact: Judicial autonomy is vital to uphold Rule of Law by ensuring impartial adjudication free from political pressure.
5. Conclusion
The Rule of Law in India has a strong constitutional foundation and judicial support.
Courts have been instrumental in protecting rights, preventing arbitrary state action, and reinforcing constitutionalism.
However, practical challenges remain in fully realizing the Rule of Law due to delays, administrative arbitrariness, political interference, and access issues.
Strengthening institutions, judicial reforms, and robust enforcement mechanisms are crucial for deepening Rule of Law in India’s democracy.
RELATED Blog
0 comments