An analysis on Legislative Control over Public Corporations
Legislative Control over Public Corporations
What are Public Corporations?
Public corporations are statutory bodies created by the government through an Act of Parliament or State Legislature. These bodies are established to undertake commercial activities on behalf of the government but operate with a certain degree of autonomy. Examples include the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), Indian Railways, and State Electricity Boards.
Why Legislative Control?
Since public corporations are funded by the government (public funds) and exercise certain powers, it is crucial to ensure that they operate within the framework of law, remain accountable, and serve the public interest. Legislative control is essential to:
Ensure accountability for public funds.
Maintain transparency and prevent misuse of power.
Protect public interest by ensuring efficient and fair operation.
Regulate and oversee their functions and finances.
Modes of Legislative Control
Statutory Framework: The enabling Act defines the corporation's powers, functions, and duties, establishing the legislative framework.
Financial Control:
Annual budgets are sanctioned by the legislature.
Corporations may be required to submit their accounts to the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG).
Legislature may scrutinize the expenditure and sanction funds accordingly.
Administrative Control:
Legislature may have the power to appoint members of the Board.
Regulations and rules governing the functioning of the corporation may be subject to legislative approval.
Reporting and audit obligations to the legislature.
Policy Control:
Legislature controls the policy framework within which the corporation operates.
Amendments to the enabling Act can be made to modify powers or functions.
Important Case Laws on Legislative Control over Public Corporations
1. S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994)
Facts: Although primarily related to federalism, this case discussed the extent of legislative and executive control over statutory bodies.
Importance: The Supreme Court emphasized that public corporations, though autonomous, remain subject to the law and legislative framework within which they are created.
Principle: Legislative control ensures that such corporations cannot act arbitrarily and are accountable under constitutional law.
2. Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa (1978)
Facts: The question was whether a public corporation like the Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board could be classified as a “State” under Article 12 of the Constitution, thus making it subject to fundamental rights obligations.
Held: The Supreme Court held that because the corporation was controlled by the government and performed public functions, it was a “State” under Article 12.
Importance: This case affirms legislative control by holding public corporations accountable under the constitutional framework, not just their enabling statute.
3. Union of India v. Hindustan Development Corporation Ltd. (1969)
Facts: The issue was whether a public corporation enjoys immunity from certain suits due to its government character.
Held: The Supreme Court held that legislative control is essential because public corporations act as instruments of government policy but cannot be immune from legislative or judicial oversight.
Principle: The government’s control over a public corporation ensures accountability and oversight.
4. Syndicate Bank Ltd. v. Union of India (1969)
Facts: Concerned legislative control over the management and operations of public sector banks.
Held: The Court recognized the government's power to frame policies and control the functioning of such corporations in public interest.
Importance: Legislative control extends to policy-making and operational oversight.
5. Calcutta Port Commissioners v. Dilip Kumar Bose (1967)
Facts: The question was about the extent of administrative control exercised by the government over public corporations managing ports.
Held: The Supreme Court upheld that the government has the power to control and regulate public corporations to ensure smooth functioning and adherence to government policy.
Principle: Legislative and administrative control is necessary for effective governance of public corporations.
6. Union of India v. Madras Bar Association (2014)
Facts: Related to public corporations and their powers versus judicial scrutiny.
Held: The Supreme Court reiterated that even though public corporations are statutory bodies, they cannot act arbitrarily and are subject to judicial review.
Importance: Legislative control is supported by judicial oversight to ensure accountability.
Summary: Why Legislative Control is Vital
Legal Framework: The legislature defines the powers and functions of public corporations through statutes.
Financial Accountability: Legislative approval of funds ensures public money is spent appropriately.
Administrative Oversight: Appointment and control over management prevent misuse of power.
Judicial and Legislative Oversight: Courts and legislatures keep these bodies accountable, preventing abuse and ensuring public welfare.
RELATED Blog
0 comments