The growth of public administration since independence
I. Introduction: What is Public Administration?
Public Administration is the execution and implementation of government policy through bureaucracy. It involves planning, organizing, directing, coordinating, and controlling governmental operations. After independence in 1947, India inherited a colonial bureaucratic structure (the Indian Civil Services) and adapted it to suit the democratic and developmental needs of the nation.
II. Phases of Growth Since Independence
1. Post-Independence Era (1947–1960s)
Priority: Nation-building, integration of princely states, and implementation of Five-Year Plans.
The bureaucracy (especially the Indian Administrative Service) played a central role in economic planning, infrastructure development, and public order.
2. Developmental Administration (1970s–1980s)
Expansion of the welfare state with programs targeting poverty, education, health.
The bureaucracy's role expanded beyond law and order to service delivery.
Introduction of Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs).
3. Liberalization and Administrative Reform (1991 onwards)
Economic liberalization in 1991 led to downsizing of bureaucracy, privatization, and focus on governance over control.
Emergence of e-governance, Right to Information (RTI), and citizen charters.
4. Contemporary Period (2000s–present)
Emphasis on transparency, accountability, digitization, and citizen participation.
Growth of specialized agencies like NITI Aayog, and reforms in civil service recruitment and training.
III. Constitutional and Legal Framework
Article 309–311: Protection and regulation of civil services.
Article 320: Functions of the Union and State Public Service Commissions.
Article 12: Defines "State" to include government agencies — key in enforcing fundamental rights against public bodies.
Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985: Provides for dispute resolution mechanisms for government employees.
Right to Information Act, 2005: Makes public administration transparent and accountable.
IV. Key Case Law Influencing Public Administration in India
1. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) – AIR 1973 SC 1461
Issue: Extent of Parliament's power to amend the Constitution.
Held: Introduced the “Basic Structure Doctrine”, limiting arbitrary changes to essential features like rule of law, separation of powers, and judicial review.
Significance for Public Administration:
Ensured that administrative policies and laws cannot override the Constitution’s basic principles.
Protected independence of institutions from executive overreach.
2. S.P. Gupta v. Union of India (1981) – AIR 1982 SC 149
Issue: Public interest litigation and transparency in judicial appointments.
Held: Recognized the importance of open government and citizen’s right to know.
Significance:
Laid the groundwork for RTI movement.
Marked a shift towards citizen-centric public administration.
3. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) – AIR 1978 SC 597
Issue: Whether the government can seize a passport without giving reasons.
Held: Due process of law is essential under Article 21; any administrative action must be fair, just, and reasonable.
Significance:
Greatly expanded the scope of procedural fairness in administrative actions.
Ensured that bureaucratic discretion is subject to judicial scrutiny.
4. Union of India v. Tulsiram Patel (1985) – AIR 1985 SC 1416
Issue: Dismissal of government employees without inquiry under Article 311(2).
Held: In exceptional cases (e.g., threat to national security), inquiry can be dispensed with.
Significance:
Balanced disciplinary powers of public administration with employee rights.
Clarified exceptions to procedural safeguards for civil servants.
5. A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India (1969) – AIR 1970 SC 150
Issue: Whether administrative actions must follow principles of natural justice.
Held: Drew a distinction between administrative and quasi-judicial functions, but emphasized that fairness must apply to both.
Significance:
Introduced natural justice as a requirement in public decision-making.
A milestone in judicial control over administrative discretion.
6. Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975) – AIR 1975 SC 2299
Issue: Validity of PM’s election under Representation of the People Act.
Held: Certain constitutional amendments are invalid if they violate democratic structure.
Significance:
Asserted judicial supremacy over politically motivated administrative actions.
Reinforced checks on executive power.
7. Centre for PIL v. Union of India (2011) – (2011) 4 SCC 1
Issue: Challenged appointment of Central Vigilance Commissioner (CVC).
Held: Appointment quashed due to lack of integrity; process must be fair and transparent.
Significance:
Elevated ethical standards in public appointments.
Demonstrated judicial activism in administrative oversight.
V. Major Reforms Driving Growth in Public Administration
| Reform | Description |
|---|---|
| Right to Information Act (2005) | Increased transparency; citizens can access government records. |
| e-Governance Initiatives | Platforms like Digital India, Aadhaar, DBT improved efficiency. |
| Civil Service Reforms | Emphasis on training, lateral entry, performance appraisal. |
| NITI Aayog (2015) | Replaced Planning Commission with a think-tank model. |
| Citizen Charters & Sevottam | Commitment to service quality and grievance redress. |
VI. Challenges Faced in Public Administration
Bureaucratic delays and red-tapism
Corruption and lack of accountability
Resistance to administrative reforms
Politicization of bureaucracy
Capacity constraints in local governance
VII. Conclusion
Since independence, public administration in India has grown from a colonial legacy into a complex and responsive democratic system, guided by constitutional mandates, judicial interpretations, and citizen participation.
The judiciary has played a crucial role in:
Defining the limits of administrative discretion
Reinforcing transparency and accountability
Protecting the rights of individuals against arbitrary actions
Encouraging reforms and good governance
This growth reflects not just institutional expansion, but also a deeper transformation in administrative values — from control to service, from secrecy to transparency, and from elitism to citizen-centric governance.
RELATED Blog
0 comments