Role of the Bill of Rights in administrative law
Role of the Bill of Rights in Administrative Law
I. INTRODUCTION
The Bill of Rights, usually enshrined in the Constitution, guarantees fundamental rights such as equality before the law, freedom of speech, right to life and personal liberty, protection against arbitrary action, and right to fair procedure. These rights are crucial in administrative law as they:
Place limits on administrative power,
Ensure administrative actions respect individual rights,
Provide a basis for judicial review,
Safeguard against abuse of power,
Require procedural fairness and due process in decision-making.
Administrative authorities must exercise their powers in a manner consistent with the Bill of Rights. Courts use fundamental rights as a standard to review and restrain administrative action, ensuring that government does not act arbitrarily or oppressively.
II. PRINCIPLES ON THE ROLE OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS IN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
Protection against arbitrary exercise of power: Administrative actions must not violate fundamental rights.
Right to fair hearing (Audi Alteram Partem): The Bill of Rights often guarantees procedural fairness before depriving a person of life, liberty, or property.
Reasonableness and legality: Administrative decisions must comply with principles of reasonableness, non-discrimination, and legality under fundamental rights.
Judicial review for violations: Courts can strike down administrative actions that infringe on fundamental rights.
Positive obligations: In some cases, the Bill of Rights imposes positive duties on administrative bodies to protect or promote rights.
III. DETAILED CASE LAW DISCUSSION
1. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248
Facts:
Maneka Gandhi’s passport was impounded by the government without prior notice or hearing.
Held:
The Supreme Court expanded the scope of Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) to include the right to a fair procedure.
It held that any administrative action depriving a person of liberty must be "fair, just and reasonable".
This case applied the Bill of Rights to administrative actions, emphasizing due process and procedural fairness.
Role of Bill of Rights:
The Court used the fundamental right to personal liberty to control and review administrative decisions.
Established that administrative powers must be exercised respecting constitutional rights.
2. E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu (1974) 4 SCC 3
Facts:
An administrative action by the government was challenged on grounds of arbitrariness.
Held:
The Court held that arbitrariness violates Article 14 (Right to Equality).
Arbitrariness in administrative action is antithetical to the rule of law.
The Bill of Rights here limits administrative discretion by prohibiting arbitrary or discriminatory actions.
Role of Bill of Rights:
Ensured administrative actions must be rational, fair, and non-arbitrary.
Under Article 14, courts protect citizens from arbitrary administrative decisions.
3. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985) 3 SCC 545
Facts:
Slum dwellers challenged their eviction by the municipal corporation as it violated their right to livelihood.
Held:
The Supreme Court held that right to livelihood is part of Article 21 (Right to Life).
Administrative actions depriving people of livelihood or shelter must follow due process and cannot be arbitrary.
The Bill of Rights safeguards against harsh administrative decisions affecting basic human dignity.
Role of Bill of Rights:
The Court enforced fundamental rights against administrative policies.
Ensured administrative actions consider human rights implications.
4. A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India (1969) 2 SCC 262
Facts:
The selection committee for appointments was alleged to be biased and non-transparent.
Held:
The Court emphasized right to fair procedure as part of Article 14 and 21.
Administrative authorities must act fairly and without bias.
The Bill of Rights provides a constitutional basis for ensuring fairness and transparency in administrative decision-making.
Role of Bill of Rights:
Reinforced the principle of natural justice (audi alteram partem).
Provided a remedy for administrative decisions violating fair hearing.
5. K. S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 1
Facts:
Challenge to the government’s Aadhaar scheme on grounds of privacy violation.
Held:
The Court recognized Right to Privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21.
Administrative actions involving personal data must comply with constitutional privacy protections.
The Bill of Rights limits administrative surveillance and data collection powers.
Role of Bill of Rights:
Protects citizens against invasive administrative measures.
Ensures privacy and data protection in administrative governance.
6. In Re: Kerala Education Bill (1958) SCR 995
Facts:
The validity of Kerala Education Bill restricting rights of private educational institutions was challenged.
Held:
The Court held that administrative or legislative action limiting fundamental rights must pass the test of reasonableness and non-discrimination under Article 19 and Article 14.
Administrative regulations affecting rights must be justified.
Role of Bill of Rights:
Acts as a check on administrative regulation affecting freedom of speech, association, and property rights.
IV. SUMMARY OF HOW THE BILL OF RIGHTS IMPACTS ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
| Fundamental Right | Impact on Administrative Law | Key Case |
|---|---|---|
| Right to Life & Liberty (Art. 21) | Ensures due process, fairness, reasonableness | Maneka Gandhi, Olga Tellis |
| Equality Before Law (Art. 14) | Prohibits arbitrariness and discrimination | E.P. Royappa, A.K. Kraipak |
| Freedom of Speech/Expression (Art. 19) | Limits administrative censorship or restriction | In Re Kerala Education Bill |
| Right to Privacy (Implied in Art. 21) | Controls administrative data collection | K.S. Puttaswamy |
V. CONCLUSION
The Bill of Rights forms the constitutional foundation for administrative law. It empowers courts to:
Review administrative actions for violations of fundamental rights,
Enforce procedural fairness and natural justice,
Prevent abuse, arbitrariness, and discrimination,
Protect human dignity and personal freedoms.
Without the Bill of Rights, administrative powers could be unchecked and potentially oppressive. The synergy between constitutional rights and administrative law is essential for upholding the rule of law and justice in a democratic society.
RELATED Blog
0 comments