Rule of Law and its Application in India
📘 What is the Rule of Law?
The Rule of Law is a foundational principle in any democratic society. It means that:
"No one is above the law, and everyone is equal before the law."
In India, Rule of Law is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, but it is deeply embedded in its structure—especially through:
Article 14 – Equality before the law
Article 21 – Protection of life and personal liberty
Article 32 – Right to constitutional remedies
Judicial Review – Power to invalidate arbitrary state action
The Rule of Law ensures that:
Government powers are limited by law
Arbitrary use of power is prohibited
Citizens have legal remedies if their rights are violated
The judiciary is independent
🇮🇳 Application of Rule of Law in India
India adopted the Rule of Law from the British legal system, as articulated by A.V. Dicey, but expanded it under the Constitution to include social justice, fundamental rights, and constitutional supremacy.
The Supreme Court of India has played a vital role in interpreting and applying the rule of law in various contexts such as:
Arbitrary administrative action
Violations of fundamental rights
Abuse of power by the legislature or executive
Ensuring judicial independence
🧑⚖️ Key Case Laws on Rule of Law in India
Let’s look at more than four important case laws that have shaped the application of the Rule of Law in India.
1. A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950)
Facts: Gopalan was detained under a preventive detention law. He challenged the detention as a violation of his right to life and liberty under Article 21.
Judgment: The Supreme Court upheld the detention, taking a narrow view of "procedure established by law."
Importance: Though the case restricted personal liberty, it was an early test of the rule of law.
Later Development: Overruled by Maneka Gandhi in 1978.
2. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)
Facts: Concerned the validity of constitutional amendments that affected property rights.
Judgment: The court ruled that Parliament cannot alter the basic structure of the Constitution.
Rule of Law Aspect: The Rule of Law was declared part of the Basic Structure Doctrine, meaning it cannot be amended or destroyed by Parliament.
Significance: Established constitutional supremacy and limited arbitrary legislative power.
3. Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975)
Facts: Challenge to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s election under the Representation of the People Act.
Judgment: The court struck down certain parts of the amendment as violating the basic structure.
Rule of Law Application: Reaffirmed that even high officials are not above the law and elections must be subject to judicial review.
4. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978)
Facts: Maneka Gandhi's passport was impounded without a hearing.
Judgment: The court ruled that any procedure affecting life or liberty must be just, fair, and reasonable.
Rule of Law Aspect: Extended the scope of Article 21 and emphasized that arbitrary executive action violates the rule of law.
Significance: Expanded the meaning of personal liberty and due process.
5. ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976) (Also known as the Habeas Corpus case)
Facts: During the Emergency, the right to habeas corpus (protection from unlawful detention) was suspended.
Judgment: The majority held that fundamental rights could be suspended.
Rule of Law Aspect: This case was a low point for the rule of law, as the judiciary sided with the government.
Later Development: The decision was overruled in 2017 (Justice K.S. Puttaswamy case) and declared unconstitutional.
6. I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu (2007)
Facts: Challenge to laws placed under the Ninth Schedule to shield them from judicial review.
Judgment: The Supreme Court ruled that even laws in the Ninth Schedule are subject to review if they violate fundamental rights.
Rule of Law Aspect: Ensures no law is above the Constitution, and judicial scrutiny is an essential part of the rule of law.
7. Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017)
Facts: Concerned the right to privacy and the constitutionality of Aadhaar.
Judgment: Declared right to privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21.
Rule of Law Aspect: Reinforced constitutionalism, accountability, and individual rights.
Importance: Rejected ADM Jabalpur and strengthened judicial commitment to the rule of law.
🔍 Summary: Dimensions of Rule of Law in Indian Context
| Aspect | Rule of Law Application | Case Law |
|---|---|---|
| Equality before law | No special privileges, equal legal treatment | Kesavananda Bharati, Indira Gandhi |
| Supremacy of Constitution | Constitution > Legislature or Executive | Kesavananda Bharati, I.R. Coelho |
| Protection of Fundamental Rights | Arbitrary actions are unconstitutional | Maneka Gandhi, Puttaswamy |
| Judicial Review | Courts can invalidate unconstitutional laws | Minerva Mills, I.R. Coelho |
| Independent Judiciary | Separation from executive ensures enforcement of rule of law | S.P. Gupta v. Union of India |
| Accountability of State | Government must act lawfully and justifiably | Maneka Gandhi, Puttaswamy |
✅ Conclusion
The Rule of Law in India has evolved through judicial decisions and constitutional interpretation. It has grown from a colonial concept into a constitutional guarantee that:
No person or authority is above the law
Arbitrary power is checked
Fundamental rights are protected
The Constitution reigns supreme
The judiciary has been central in preserving the rule of law, especially during constitutional crises and times of executive overreach.
RELATED Blog
0 comments