Midnight rulemaking phenomenon
🔎 What Is Midnight Rulemaking?
Midnight rulemaking refers to the surge of regulations issued by an outgoing presidential administration — typically between the presidential election and inauguration (the "lame duck" period).
Why does it happen?
Outgoing administrations try to cement their policies before the new president takes over.
Agencies push through controversial or long-delayed rules quickly.
Often used to limit the incoming administration’s ability to reverse course.
⚖️ Legal Issues Raised
Were the rules rushed or procedurally flawed?
Did agencies skip or compress the notice-and-comment process?
Can the new administration reverse or delay them easily?
Is there any judicial limit on midnight rulemaking?
đź“š Case Law: More Than Five Detailed Cases
âś… 1. Environmental Defense Fund v. EPA (1983)
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals (D.C. Circuit)
Context: Carter administration issued environmental rules just before Reagan took office. The new EPA tried to delay and withdraw them.
Issue: Can the new administration delay final rules that were properly issued before inauguration?
Holding: No — once a rule is published in the Federal Register, it's legally binding unless repealed through formal rulemaking.
Significance: Courts limit informal reversals of midnight rules — agencies must follow proper repeal procedures.
âś… 2. Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) v. Abraham (2004)
Court: U.S. District Court
Context: Clinton DOE finalized energy efficiency standards. The Bush administration tried to withdraw the rule after it was posted online but before it appeared in the Federal Register.
Issue: Was the rule legally effective before Federal Register publication?
Holding: No — rules only become effective upon publication, so the withdrawal was valid.
Significance: Shows that timing and publication are critical in determining if a midnight rule is enforceable.
âś… 3. Air Transport Association v. Department of Transportation (1995)
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals
Context: DOT under the Bush (41) administration issued rules on airline advertising hours before Clinton took office.
Issue: Were the rules rushed or arbitrary due to the timing?
Holding: The court upheld the rule, noting it followed proper procedures.
Significance: Courts won’t strike down midnight rules just because they were last-minute — they look for procedural flaws.
âś… 4. AFL-CIO v. Chao (2002)
Court: U.S. District Court
Context: The Clinton administration finalized union reporting rules that were politically controversial. The Bush administration tried to change or withdraw them.
Issue: Can an incoming administration alter a rule without going through new rulemaking?
Holding: No — changing a final rule requires notice-and-comment under the APA.
Significance: Midnight rules are legally binding unless properly repealed, even if politically unpopular.
âś… 5. Public Citizen v. Trump (2019)
Court: U.S. District Court
Context: While not about midnight rules per se, this case challenged Trump's “2-for-1” executive order, requiring two rules to be repealed for every new one issued — a tool that could be used to cancel midnight rules.
Issue: Is it legal to require regulatory offsets not based on the merits of the rule?
Holding: The court dismissed the case for lack of standing, but the challenge raised questions about mass repeal strategies.
Significance: Shows how midnight rules can be caught in broad deregulatory efforts by new administrations.
âś… 6. Center for Biological Diversity v. Regan (2021)
Court: Ongoing in U.S. District Court
Context: Trump’s EPA issued “midnight rules” narrowing the definition of “habitat” under the Endangered Species Act.
Issue: Did the agency skip necessary environmental impact review and comment period?
Status: Litigation is ongoing, with some rules being reversed or stayed.
Significance: Illustrates how environmental groups often challenge midnight environmental rollbacks based on APA violations.
🔄 Can Midnight Rules Be Reversed?
Yes, but not easily. Options include:
| Method | Requires... | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| New Rulemaking | Full APA process | Time-consuming |
| CRA (Congressional Review Act) | Simple majority in Congress + president’s signature | Must be done within ~60 legislative days |
| Court Challenges | Proof of procedural or substantive flaws | Courts defer to agency expertise |
🧠Summary: Key Takeaways
| Legal Point | Key Case | Lesson |
|---|---|---|
| Final rules can't be casually reversed | Environmental Defense Fund v. EPA | Agencies must go through APA |
| A rule isn’t “final” until published | NRDC v. Abraham | Publication timing is crucial |
| Midnight timing alone isn’t fatal | Air Transport Assn. | Courts care about procedure, not politics |
| Political disagreement isn’t enough | AFL-CIO v. Chao | Rule must be repealed lawfully |
| CRA can cancel midnight rules | Post-2001 Congresses | But must act fast after transition |
đź’¬ Quick Questions to Check Your Understanding:
What makes a midnight rule legally binding — proposal or publication?
Can a new administration delay a published rule by memo alone?
How does the Congressional Review Act affect midnight rules?
RELATED Blog
0 comments