Delegated legislation and constitutional limitations
š§¾ I. WHAT IS DELEGATED LEGISLATION?
Delegated legislation refers to rules, regulations, and orders made by administrative agencies under authority granted by Congress. Congress cannot administer every detail of modern governance, so it delegates rulemaking authority to agencies to fill in the gaps and implement statutory schemes.
However, the U.S. Constitution vests legislative power solely in Congress (Article I, Section 1). This raises a core question:
How far can Congress delegate its lawmaking power to agencies without violating the Constitution?
āļø II. CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS ON DELEGATED LEGISLATION
There are two primary constitutional doctrines that limit delegation:
1. Nondelegation Doctrine
Congress may not delegate its core legislative power to another branch unless it provides an āintelligible principleā to guide the agency.
2. Separation of Powers
Delegation must not undermine the balance of power among the branches, particularly by giving agencies unfettered discretion or law-making power without accountability.
š III. CASE LAW: DELEGATED LEGISLATION & CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITS
Here are six major cases illustrating how courts have interpreted and limited delegated legislative authority:
ā 1. Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan, 293 U.S. 388 (1935)
Topic: Nondelegation
Facts:
Under the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA), the President was given power to prohibit the interstate shipment of oil produced in violation of state law. There were no clear guidelines on when or how to use that power.
Held:
The Supreme Court struck down the provision as an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power, because Congress failed to provide an intelligible principle.
Significance:
First time the nondelegation doctrine was used to invalidate a statute.
Set a precedent that agencies cannot be given blanket authority without direction.
ā 2. A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, 295 U.S. 495 (1935)
Topic: Excessive delegation
Facts:
The NIRA authorized the President to approve ācodes of fair competitionā drafted by industries, essentially letting private groups propose binding regulations.
Held:
The Court struck down the law, holding that it delegated legislative power to the President without clear standards or limits.
Significance:
Reinforced limits on legislative delegation.
Rejected the idea that the President or private actors could make binding rules without statutory guidance.
One of the few times delegated legislation was struck down as unconstitutional.
ā 3. Yakus v. United States, 321 U.S. 414 (1944)
Topic: Permissible delegation
Facts:
During WWII, Congress gave the Price Administrator authority to set maximum prices for commodities to prevent inflation, based on general standards of fairness and necessity.
Held:
The Supreme Court upheld the statute, finding that Congress had given sufficient guiding standards, and the delegation was within constitutional limits.
Significance:
Confirmed that broad delegation is acceptable if there's an intelligible principle.
Upheld agency discretion in times of emergency, provided Congress outlines goals and procedures.
ā 4. Whitman v. American Trucking Associations, 531 U.S. 457 (2001)
Topic: Modern application of nondelegation
Facts:
The Clean Air Act allowed the EPA to set air quality standards necessary to protect public health āwith an adequate margin of safety,ā but didnāt specify how costs should factor in.
Held:
The Supreme Court upheld the delegation, stating that the statute provided an intelligible principle ā the protection of public health.
Significance:
Reaffirmed that even broad and general standards can satisfy the nondelegation doctrine.
Justice Scalia emphasized that the Court has never invalidated a delegation since 1935.
Shows modern courts rarely invoke the nondelegation doctrine to strike down laws.
ā 5. Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S. 361 (1989)
Topic: Delegation to independent bodies
Facts:
Congress created the United States Sentencing Commission, an independent agency within the judicial branch, to establish binding sentencing guidelines.
Held:
The Court upheld the delegation, finding that Congress gave the Commission clear goals and standards, and the Commission acted within constitutional limits.
Significance:
Demonstrated that even delegation to hybrid or non-executive bodies can be constitutional.
Reinforced that Congress must guide the agency with an intelligible principle, but does not need to micromanage.
ā 6. Gundy v. United States, 588 U.S. ___ (2019)
Topic: Revival attempt of nondelegation doctrine
Facts:
Under the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), the Attorney General had the authority to determine how registration requirements applied to offenders convicted before the lawās enactment.
Held:
A plurality of the Court upheld the statute, holding that it provided sufficient guidance to the Attorney General.
Significance:
Justice Gorsuch, in dissent, strongly argued for reviving the nondelegation doctrine.
The case signaled a potential shift in the Courtās willingness to enforce stricter limits on delegation.
Still, the Court did not overturn the delegation, maintaining the postāNew Deal tradition of deference.
š§ IV. ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK: HOW COURTS ASSESS DELEGATION
To assess whether a delegation is constitutional, courts generally ask:
Did Congress clearly delegate authority to the agency?
Did Congress provide an āintelligible principleā to guide the agencyās actions?
Is the delegation so broad that it gives the agency unchecked lawmaking power?
Are there procedural safeguards or meaningful oversight mechanisms?
š V. SUMMARY TABLE
| Case | Issue | Holding | Key Principle |
|---|---|---|---|
| Panama Refining (1935) | Unclear delegation to President | Unconstitutional | First use of nondelegation doctrine |
| Schechter Poultry (1935) | Broad delegation to private actors | Unconstitutional | Agencies need clear legislative standards |
| Yakus v. U.S. (1944) | Wartime price controls | Constitutional | Broad discretion OK with goals and procedures |
| Whitman v. ATA (2001) | EPA air standards | Constitutional | General standards are enough |
| Mistretta v. U.S. (1989) | Sentencing Commission | Constitutional | Hybrid agencies can receive delegated power |
| Gundy v. U.S. (2019) | Retroactive authority to AG | Constitutional (plurality) | Hinted at possible revival of strict scrutiny |
š VI. CONCLUSION
The nondelegation doctrine sets a constitutional ceiling on how much power Congress can hand over to administrative agencies, but that ceiling has historically been very high.
Key Takeaways:
Courts require only an intelligible principle ā a fairly low standard.
Only twice in U.S. history (both in 1935) has the Supreme Court struck down a law for improper delegation.
Recent dissents (e.g., Gorsuch in Gundy) suggest the Court may tighten delegation standards in the future.
The balance lies in preserving legislative accountability while allowing agencies the flexibility to administer complex modern laws.
RELATED Blog
0 comments