Labor regulation (OSHA, NLRB)
Labor Regulation: OSHA and NLRB
1. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
OSHA was created under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 to ensure safe and healthful working conditions by setting and enforcing standards and providing training, outreach, education, and assistance.
OSHA regulates workplace hazards.
Employers must comply with OSHA standards.
OSHA conducts inspections and issues citations and penalties.
Key OSHA Cases:
a) Industrial Union Department, AFL-CIO v. American Petroleum Institute (Benzene Case), 448 U.S. 607 (1980)
Facts: OSHA set exposure limits for benzene, a known carcinogen, based on scientific evidence.
Issue: Did OSHA have enough evidence to justify the new standard?
Holding: The Supreme Court ruled that OSHA must demonstrate that the standard is "reasonably necessary or appropriate" to reduce a significant risk. OSHA’s evidence was insufficient to prove the benzene standard was necessary to reduce a significant risk at the levels set.
Significance: Established that OSHA must have substantial evidence that a health risk is significant before setting workplace standards.
b) Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, 467 U.S. 837 (1984)
Facts: Although this is the famous Chevron case, it also involved OSHA regulations.
Issue: The level of deference courts must give OSHA’s interpretation of the statute it administers.
Holding: The Supreme Court ruled that courts must defer to OSHA’s reasonable interpretations of ambiguous statutory provisions under the Chevron doctrine.
Significance: Affirmed OSHA’s authority to interpret the OSHA Act within its regulatory sphere.
c) Secretary of Labor v. OSHRC (Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission) cases
OSHA citations are reviewed by the OSHRC, and courts review OSHRC decisions for legal error.
Courts usually defer to OSHA’s expertise but require OSHA to prove violations with substantial evidence.
For example, OSHA must prove:
The cited standard applies.
The employer violated the standard.
Employees were exposed to the hazard.
The employer knew or should have known about the hazard.
2. National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
The NLRB was created under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) of 1935 (Wagner Act). It governs collective bargaining and protects the rights of employees to organize and engage in concerted activities.
The NLRB investigates and remedies unfair labor practices (ULPs) by employers or unions.
It oversees elections for union representation.
Key NLRB Cases:
a) NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1 (1937)
Facts: The steel company was accused of discriminating against workers for union activities.
Issue: Did the NLRA exceed Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause?
Holding: The Supreme Court upheld the NLRA, holding Congress could regulate labor relations affecting interstate commerce.
Significance: Marked a major shift in labor law, upholding federal labor regulation and NLRB authority.
b) NLRB v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago, 440 U.S. 490 (1979)
Facts: The NLRB asserted jurisdiction over teachers at a Catholic school.
Issue: Whether the NLRB can regulate labor relations in church-operated schools.
Holding: The Court ruled that the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause prevents the NLRB from regulating labor relations in religious schools.
Significance: Established the “church autonomy” doctrine limiting NLRB jurisdiction.
c) Communications Workers of America v. Beck, 487 U.S. 735 (1988)
Facts: A union charged fees to non-members for activities beyond collective bargaining.
Issue: Whether non-members can be forced to pay fees used for political activities.
Holding: The Court held that non-members must only pay fees related to collective bargaining and representation, not political activities.
Significance: Set limits on union fee collection from non-members under NLRA.
d) NLRB v. Weingarten, Inc., 420 U.S. 251 (1975)
Facts: An employee requested union representation during an investigatory interview but was denied.
Issue: Does the NLRA guarantee the right to union representation during such interviews?
Holding: The Supreme Court held employees have a right to union representation during interviews that could lead to discipline.
Significance: Established the "Weingarten rights" protecting workers during disciplinary investigations.
e) Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, 138 S. Ct. 1612 (2018)
Facts: Employees challenged mandatory arbitration agreements prohibiting collective action.
Issue: Does the NLRA protect employees’ rights to class or collective action in arbitration?
Holding: The Court ruled that arbitration agreements that waive collective action rights are enforceable, and the NLRA does not override the Federal Arbitration Act.
Significance: A major ruling limiting collective labor action rights in arbitration.
Summary
OSHA: Focuses on workplace safety and health. The courts require OSHA to show significant risk and reasonableness in regulation (Benzene Case). Courts defer to OSHA’s expertise but require substantial evidence.
NLRB: Governs labor relations and protects workers’ collective bargaining rights. Key cases affirm its authority (Jones & Laughlin), set limits (Catholic Bishop), and protect workers’ rights (Weingarten).
Recent trends show courts balancing labor rights with employers' contractual freedom (Epic Systems).
RELATED Blog
0 comments