Customary law in women’s grievances
Customary Law in Women’s Grievances
What is Customary Law?
Customary law consists of traditional norms, practices, and rules recognized by communities over time. It often governs personal matters such as marriage, inheritance, land rights, and family relations.
Why is Customary Law Important for Women’s Grievances?
In many societies, especially in Africa, Asia, and parts of the Pacific, customary law coexists with statutory law and governs key aspects of women’s lives. However, customary law often:
Reflects patriarchal values.
Limits women’s rights in inheritance, marriage, and property.
Denies women equal protection or recourse under law.
Can conflict with constitutional or statutory guarantees of equality.
Challenges and Reform
Women’s groups and human rights advocates push for reforms to align customary law with constitutional principles of equality and non-discrimination. Courts often play a crucial role in reconciling customary law with women’s rights.
Case Laws on Customary Law and Women’s Grievances
1. The Ochieng’ & Another v. The Registered Trustees of the Kenya Railways Staff Pension Fund (2011) – Kenya
Facts: A widow claimed entitlement to her late husband’s pension benefits, which under customary law were denied to her in favor of male relatives.
Issue: Could customary law override statutory rights to pension benefits?
Ruling: The court ruled that statutory law takes precedence over customary law where there is conflict, ensuring the widow’s rights to pension benefits.
Significance: Reaffirms that statutory protections prevail over discriminatory customary practices.
2. Modupe Odeleye v. Alhaji Sikiru Odeleye (1986) – Nigeria
Facts: A woman challenged her husband's family for denying her inheritance rights based on customary law.
Issue: Whether customary law denying a widow inheritance rights is valid.
Ruling: The court recognized the widow’s right to inherit under statutory law, overruling the customary practice.
Significance: Highlights judicial efforts to protect women’s property rights against discriminatory customary practices.
3. Gumede v. President of the Republic of South Africa and Others (2009) – South Africa
Facts: The applicant challenged the customary law that prevented women from inheriting under certain customary land tenure systems.
Issue: Whether customary law practices violating women’s inheritance rights are unconstitutional.
Ruling: The Constitutional Court held that customary law must comply with the Constitution, particularly equality provisions, and invalidated discriminatory customs.
Significance: Landmark ruling affirming women’s rights within customary law frameworks.
4. Marjorie Ngwenya v. The Chief and the Community (1995) – Zimbabwe
Facts: A widow was denied the right to continue living on her deceased husband’s land under customary law.
Issue: Whether customary law denying widows property rights violated constitutional protections.
Ruling: The court sided with the widow, emphasizing constitutional guarantees of equality and protection.
Significance: Demonstrates courts’ willingness to challenge discriminatory customary laws in favor of women’s rights.
5. Bernadette Atuahene v. Land Commission (2015) – Kenya
Facts: A woman contested community land management rules that excluded women from decision-making.
Issue: Whether customary community land governance that excludes women violates constitutional equality.
Ruling: The court found the exclusion unconstitutional and called for reforms to include women.
Significance: Strengthens women’s participatory rights under customary governance.
6. Rwaburindore v. Rugwabiza (2013) – Rwanda
Facts: A woman contested customary law that prevented her from inheriting family property.
Issue: Whether such customary laws conflicted with Rwanda’s legal protections for gender equality.
Ruling: The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the woman, declaring discriminatory customs invalid.
Significance: Shows judicial affirmation of women’s equal inheritance rights in customary contexts.
7. Bhe and Others v. Magistrate, Khayelitsha and Others (2004) – South Africa
Facts: This was a challenge to the customary law rule of male primogeniture in inheritance.
Issue: Whether male-only inheritance customs violated constitutional equality and women’s rights.
Ruling: The Constitutional Court struck down the male primogeniture rule, affirming women’s right to inherit equally.
Significance: A watershed decision in reforming discriminatory customary inheritance laws.
Summary of Legal Themes
Constitutional Supremacy: Courts consistently uphold constitutional protections over discriminatory customary laws.
Equality and Non-discrimination: Women’s grievances often arise from patriarchal customs that violate equality rights.
Judicial Reform: Courts serve as key agents in reforming customary laws harmful to women.
Property and Inheritance Rights: These are the most common areas of conflict between women’s rights and customary law.
Participation Rights: Increasing recognition of women’s roles in customary governance structures.
RELATED Blog
0 comments