Arbitration Law in Malaysia
Arbitration Law in Malaysia
Malaysia’s arbitration law is governed by the Arbitration Act 2005, which is based on the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. The Arbitration Act was designed to promote arbitration as an efficient and accessible alternative to litigation, both for domestic and international disputes. Malaysia is also a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958), which ensures that foreign arbitral awards are recognized and enforced within Malaysia.
1. Legal Framework
Arbitration Act 2005: The key legislation governing arbitration in Malaysia is the Arbitration Act 2005. The Act covers the entire arbitration process, from the formation of the arbitration agreement to the enforcement of awards. It is based on the UNCITRAL Model Law and applies to both domestic and international commercial arbitration in Malaysia.
International Conventions:
- New York Convention: Malaysia is a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. This allows foreign arbitral awards to be recognized and enforced in Malaysia, subject to specific conditions.
- Bilateral Treaties: Malaysia has also entered into various bilateral treaties with other countries that facilitate the use of arbitration for resolving commercial disputes.
2. Arbitration Agreement
Requirements: For an arbitration agreement to be valid in Malaysia, it must be in writing. The agreement can be in the form of a clause within a contract or a separate document. It should explicitly state the intention of the parties to resolve their disputes through arbitration.
Scope: The arbitration agreement can cover any type of dispute, provided it is not related to certain matters excluded by law (e.g., criminal matters or family law disputes).
Form and Enforceability: If a party to an arbitration agreement seeks to avoid arbitration, the court can intervene to enforce the arbitration agreement, compelling the parties to proceed with arbitration.
3. Types of Arbitration
Domestic Arbitration: Domestic arbitration is used for resolving disputes that arise within Malaysia. The Arbitration Act applies to both domestic and international arbitrations, and parties can choose the rules and procedures that govern the arbitration.
International Arbitration: Malaysia is increasingly used for international arbitration due to its central location in Southeast Asia and the efficiency of its legal system. The Arbitration Act provides a framework for the resolution of cross-border commercial disputes, and Malaysia’s adherence to the New York Convention ensures that foreign awards can be enforced.
4. Arbitration Procedure
Appointment of Arbitrators: The parties are free to agree on the appointment of arbitrators. If the parties cannot agree, the Arbitration Act provides mechanisms for appointing arbitrators, including the possibility of court intervention to appoint an arbitrator or tribunal.
Number of Arbitrators: The parties may agree on the number of arbitrators, usually one or three. If the number of arbitrators is not specified, a tribunal of three arbitrators will be appointed.
Arbitration Rules: The parties may select the arbitration rules that govern the arbitration, such as those from international bodies like the ICC, UNCITRAL, or any rules agreed upon by the parties. If no rules are agreed upon, the arbitral tribunal will determine the procedural rules.
Venue: The parties are free to agree on the seat (or venue) of the arbitration. If they fail to agree, the tribunal may decide the location.
5. Role of Courts
- Limited Intervention: Malaysian courts generally adopt a pro-arbitration stance, and their intervention in arbitration is limited to specific situations, such as:
- Appointment of Arbitrators: Courts can step in to appoint an arbitrator if the parties cannot agree on one.
- Interim Measures: The courts may grant interim relief before or during the arbitration process, such as orders to protect assets or preserve evidence.
- Stay of Proceedings: If there is an existing arbitration agreement, courts can stay court proceedings and compel the parties to arbitrate.
- Setting Aside Awards: Courts have the power to set aside an arbitral award on limited grounds, such as if the award is in conflict with public policy or if the tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction.
6. Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
Domestic Awards: Domestic arbitral awards are automatically enforceable in Malaysia. If a party does not comply voluntarily, the other party can seek to enforce the award through the courts.
Foreign Awards: As a signatory to the New York Convention, Malaysia is obligated to recognize and enforce foreign arbitral awards. To enforce a foreign award, a party must apply to the High Court. The court may refuse enforcement only on limited grounds, such as:
- The award was made in a country that is not a party to the New York Convention.
- The party seeking to enforce the award was not given proper notice of the arbitration proceedings.
- The enforcement of the award would be contrary to Malaysian public policy.
7. Advantages of Arbitration in Malaysia
Efficiency: Arbitration in Malaysia is generally faster and more cost-effective than litigation. The streamlined procedures and the flexibility in the choice of arbitrators and rules help expedite dispute resolution.
Neutrality: Malaysia offers a neutral forum for parties from different countries to resolve disputes, which is especially beneficial for international businesses operating in Southeast Asia.
Arbitration-Friendly Legal Framework: The Arbitration Act 2005 is designed to promote arbitration and ensure that the process is efficient, fair, and in line with international standards. Malaysia’s recognition of foreign arbitral awards enhances its attractiveness for international trade and investment.
Experienced Arbitrators and Institutions: Malaysia has a growing pool of experienced arbitrators and established arbitration institutions, including the Kuala Lumpur Regional Centre for Arbitration (KLRCA), now known as the Asian International Arbitration Centre (AIAC). These institutions provide a range of arbitration-related services and help ensure a robust arbitration environment.
8. Challenges and Opportunities
Challenges
Awareness and Education: Although arbitration is widely used in Malaysia, there is still a need to increase awareness and understanding of arbitration, especially in smaller businesses or certain sectors of the economy.
Institutional Support: While institutions like the AIAC play a key role, there is still room for greater development of arbitration services and infrastructure to cater to the increasing demand for arbitration, particularly in international disputes.
Opportunities
Regional Arbitration Hub: Malaysia has the potential to establish itself as a leading arbitration hub in Southeast Asia, particularly for disputes involving parties from ASEAN countries, China, and India.
Bilateral Investment Treaties: Malaysia's network of Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) with countries around the world offers a promising platform for arbitration in investment disputes.
Growth in International Trade: As Malaysia’s economy continues to grow and its role in international trade expands, the need for dispute resolution mechanisms like arbitration is likely to increase, offering new opportunities for arbitration practice.
9. Conclusion
Malaysia has developed a modern and comprehensive arbitration framework, with the Arbitration Act 2005 aligning the country’s practices with international standards. The legal system is pro-arbitration, offering a reliable and efficient means for resolving commercial disputes. Malaysia’s commitment to international conventions like the New York Convention ensures that foreign arbitral awards are respected, making the country an attractive venue for both domestic and international arbitration. With the growth of arbitration infrastructure and an increasing number of international businesses operating in the region, Malaysia is well-positioned to become a leading arbitration hub in Southeast Asia.
RELATED Blog
0 comments