Arbitration Law in Nepal
Arbitration in Nepal is primarily governed by the Arbitration Act, 1999 (Amended in 2006), which is designed to provide a legal framework for both domestic and international arbitration. Nepal's arbitration laws are aligned with international standards, particularly the UNCITRAL Model Law, and the country is a signatory to the New York Convention (1958), facilitating the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards.
Nepal's arbitration law is aimed at promoting the use of arbitration as a cost-effective and efficient method of resolving disputes, especially in the commercial, investment, and business sectors.
Key Aspects of Nepal’s Arbitration Law
1. Legal Framework
- Arbitration Act, 1999 (amended in 2006) governs both domestic and international arbitration in Nepal.
- Nepal is a signatory to the New York Convention (1958), which ensures that foreign arbitral awards are recognized and enforceable in Nepal, and vice versa.
- The law also aligns with the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, promoting transparency and fairness in the arbitration process.
2. Types of Arbitration
- Domestic Arbitration: This involves disputes where both parties are from Nepal and the arbitration takes place within the country.
- International Arbitration: This involves foreign parties or disputes that involve cross-border elements, where international treaties and laws, such as the New York Convention, come into play.
- Institutional vs. Ad Hoc Arbitration:
- Institutional Arbitration: Arbitration administered by an institution such as the Nepal Council of Arbitration (NEPCA) or international institutions like the ICC.
- Ad hoc Arbitration: Arbitration where the parties set their own rules and procedures without the involvement of an arbitration institution.
3. Arbitration Agreement
- Must be in writing and explicitly state that any disputes arising from the contract will be resolved through arbitration.
- It can either be a clause within a contract or a separate arbitration agreement.
- Courts in Nepal generally uphold valid arbitration agreements, except in cases of fraud, duress, or lack of capacity.
4. Arbitral Tribunal
- The number of arbitrators is generally agreed upon by the parties. In the absence of such an agreement, the default rule is typically three arbitrators.
- Arbitrators must be independent and impartial, and the parties are free to appoint arbitrators of their choice.
- Foreign arbitrators are permitted, and in international arbitration, it is common for foreign experts to be appointed to handle complex disputes.
5. Arbitration Procedure
- Parties are free to agree on the rules and procedures to be followed in arbitration, including the seat, language, and arbitration rules (e.g., UNCITRAL, ICC).
- If parties cannot agree on the procedural details, the Arbitration Act of 1999 provides default rules to govern the process.
- The arbitration process in Nepal is generally confidential, and arbitrators have the authority to grant interim measures (e.g., freezing assets, ordering injunctions).
6. Arbitral Awards
- Final and binding: Arbitral awards are final and enforceable in Nepal, with limited grounds for challenge.
- Awards must be in writing, signed by the arbitrators, and include a reasoned decision, unless the parties agree otherwise.
- Challenging an award: Grounds for challenging an award are restricted, and include:
- Lack of jurisdiction
- Serious procedural irregularities (e.g., denial of fair hearing)
- The award being contrary to public policy in Nepal.
7. Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
- Domestic awards are directly enforceable as court judgments.
- Foreign arbitral awards are recognized and enforced in Nepal under the New York Convention (1958). However, enforcement may be refused if:
- The award violates Nepali public policy.
- The award was rendered in a jurisdiction that does not recognize Nepali awards.
- The party seeking enforcement did not have an opportunity to present their case.
- Foreign arbitral awards are typically enforced through an application to the Supreme Court of Nepal.
Key Arbitration Institutions in Nepal
- Nepal Council of Arbitration (NEPCA): The leading institution for administering arbitration in Nepal.
- Arbitration and Mediation Centre: A private institution that provides arbitration services in Nepal.
- International institutions like the ICC (International Chamber of Commerce) and LCIA (London Court of International Arbitration) are also used for international disputes.
Conclusion
Nepal's Arbitration Act, 1999 provides a solid legal framework for both domestic and international arbitration, in line with international standards such as the UNCITRAL Model Law. Nepal’s commitment to the New York Convention ensures that foreign arbitral awards are recognized and enforced within the country, promoting Nepal as a viable arbitration destination in the South Asian region, especially for commercial and investment disputes.
RELATED Blog
0 comments