Power to refer parties to arbitration where there is an Arbitration Agreement
Power to Refer Parties to Arbitration Where There Is an Arbitration Agreement
I. Introduction
When parties enter into a contract containing an arbitration agreement (a clause that requires disputes to be resolved by arbitration rather than through courts), disputes arising out of that contract should ideally be resolved through arbitration.
However, sometimes one party approaches the court seeking to litigate the dispute instead of arbitration. In such cases, courts have the power (and often the duty) to refer parties to arbitration if the dispute falls within the scope of a valid arbitration agreement.
This power is fundamental to uphold party autonomy and to promote arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism.
II. Legal Basis for the Power to Refer to Arbitration
A. Statutory Provisions
India: Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (which is modeled on the UNCITRAL Model Law) mandates that when a party applies to the court alleging the existence of an arbitration agreement, the court shall refer the parties to arbitration, unless it finds that the agreement is null and void, inoperative, or incapable of being performed.
England and Wales: Under the Arbitration Act 1996, courts have powers to stay proceedings where there is an arbitration agreement.
United States: Under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), Section 3, courts must stay proceedings when the issues are referable to arbitration under an arbitration agreement.
B. Judicial Role and Approach
The courts’ role is not to decide the merits of the dispute at this stage but merely to decide:
Does a valid arbitration agreement exist?
Does the dispute fall within the scope of that agreement?
If the answers are yes, the court must stay litigation and refer parties to arbitration.
III. Key Case Laws on Power to Refer to Arbitration
1. Bhatia International v. Bulk Trading S.A. (2002) 4 SCC 105 (India)
The Supreme Court held that courts have a mandatory duty to refer parties to arbitration when there is a valid arbitration agreement, even in the absence of an arbitration institution.
It clarified that even interim relief can be granted by courts, but substantive disputes should be sent to arbitration.
2. Chloro Controls India Pvt. Ltd. v. Severn Trent Water Purification Inc. (2013) 1 SCC 641 (India)
This case overruled some earlier decisions that limited courts' power to intervene.
The Court emphasized that Section 8 is mandatory and courts must refer parties to arbitration unless the arbitration agreement is null, inoperative, or incapable of being performed.
The scope of this power includes disputes relating to contracts containing arbitration clauses.
3. Fiona Trust & Holding Corporation v. Privalov [2007] UKHL 40 (UK)
The House of Lords endorsed a pro-arbitration approach.
It stressed that courts should give effect to arbitration agreements by referring disputes to arbitration rather than adjudicating them.
The judgment also clarified that arbitration agreements should be interpreted broadly, and doubts are resolved in favor of arbitration.
4. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011) (USA)
The US Supreme Court emphasized the strong federal policy favoring arbitration.
Courts must rigorously enforce arbitration agreements according to their terms, and refer disputes to arbitration.
IV. Procedure for Referral to Arbitration
When a party invokes the arbitration clause and applies to the court to stay proceedings and refer to arbitration, the court examines:
Existence of a valid arbitration agreement.
Whether the dispute is covered by that agreement.
If satisfied, the court issues an order staying court proceedings and directing parties to resolve the dispute through arbitration.
V. Exceptions to Referral Power
Courts will refuse to refer to arbitration in the following situations:
The arbitration agreement is null and void (e.g., forged, illegal).
The arbitration agreement is inoperative (e.g., terminated by parties).
The arbitration agreement is incapable of being performed (e.g., arbitration is impossible due to some reason).
The dispute is not covered by the arbitration agreement.
In some jurisdictions, where public policy prohibits arbitration (very limited cases, like criminal matters or certain family disputes).
VI. Summary
| Aspect | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Power to refer | Courts must stay proceedings and refer parties to arbitration if a valid arbitration agreement exists. |
| Basis | Arbitration and Conciliation Act (India), Arbitration Act (UK), FAA (USA). |
| Test | Existence of valid arbitration agreement and dispute falls within its scope. |
| Exceptions | Invalid, inoperative, or incapable arbitration agreement; dispute outside scope. |
| Purpose | Uphold party autonomy and promote arbitration. |
| Court's Role | Limited to verifying existence and scope of arbitration agreement, not merits of dispute. |
VII. Conclusion
The power to refer parties to arbitration when an arbitration agreement exists is a cornerstone of modern arbitration law. Courts respect the principle of party autonomy, recognizing that parties choose arbitration to avoid lengthy litigation. Judicial intervention is limited to ensuring the agreement’s validity and scope, after which disputes must be resolved through arbitration, ensuring efficiency, finality, and respect for contractual choice.
RELATED Blog
0 comments