Arbitration Law in China
Arbitration Law in China
Dispute arbitration is pillars of modern societies. China is no exception as it joins a long list of countries with increasingly developed systems for performing arbitration. The factors that influence arbitrations in Chine comes from beyond its borders and include the economy of the nation and its degree of integration within international commerce. In addition, trade laws, treaties, and international conventions also was China become a hub of arbitration both domestically and externally.
- Information System for Arbitration in China
Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China (1994):
In 1995, China passed the Arbitration Law which is considered to be the initial step towards subjective arbitration achieved by both Chinese citizens and foreigners. The said law covers the parts of the arbitration contract, the formation of an arbitration panel, and the carrying out of the given arbitral orders.
Civil Procedure Law:
This diplomat implies the absence of judicial checks and the order consisting of arbitral rewards. Chinese judges bypass executing required norms of the Civil Procedure Law since contradicts to the Arbitration Law and limits implementation of demands by Chinese judges to designated awards.
The Arbitration Rules of the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC):
CIETAC is one of the most prominent arbitration institutions in China, and its arbitration rules offer a comprehensive set of procedural guidelines for arbitration. These rules are widely used for resolving international commercial disputes.
International Conventions and Treaties:
China is a signatory to several major international agreements that influence its arbitration system, most notably:
- The New York Convention (1958): China is a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, which facilitates the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in China.
- The Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (ICSID Convention): China is also a party to the ICSID Convention, which provides a framework for resolving disputes between governments and foreign investors.
2. Key Features of Arbitration in China
Arbitration Agreement
- An arbitration agreement in China must be written and can either be included in a separate agreement or as a clause in a larger contract. The agreement should specify key aspects such as the arbitral institution, the seat of arbitration, and the applicable arbitration rules.
- Arbitration clauses are enforceable, and the courts will compel arbitration if one party refuses to proceed with arbitration when the agreement exists.
Arbitral Tribunal
- The arbitral tribunal typically consists of one or three arbitrators, with the number usually determined by the parties. If the parties do not agree on the number, the arbitral institution or court can appoint the arbitrators.
- Arbitrators must be impartial and independent. Parties may choose arbitrators with specific expertise in the subject matter of the dispute.
Arbitration Procedure
- Flexibility in Procedure: The parties have the freedom to agree on the procedural rules and framework for arbitration. If the parties do not specify, the arbitral institution (such as CIETAC or another recognized body) will set the procedural rules.
- Language: The language of the arbitration can be determined by the parties. Typically, Mandarin Chinese is used in domestic arbitration, while English may be used in international arbitration.
- Seat of Arbitration: The seat of arbitration can be freely chosen by the parties, and it determines the legal jurisdiction in which the arbitration is deemed to take place.
Interim Measures
- Chinese law allows both arbitral tribunals and courts to issue interim measures to preserve evidence, prevent the destruction of assets, or ensure the effectiveness of the arbitration. Arbitration tribunals have broad powers to issue such measures, but enforcement may require assistance from the courts in China.
3. Judicial Intervention in Arbitration
Limited Judicial Intervention
- Courts in China have a supportive role in the arbitration process and generally intervene only when necessary. Judicial intervention is limited to situations such as:
- Enforcing arbitration agreements: Courts may compel arbitration if one party refuses to adhere to an arbitration agreement.
- Interim relief: Courts can issue interim measures to assist in the arbitration process.
- Appointment of arbitrators: If the parties are unable to agree on the appointment of arbitrators, the court may intervene and make the appointment.
Setting Aside Arbitral Awards
- An arbitral award may be set aside by a Chinese court on limited grounds, such as:
- Invalidity of the arbitration agreement.
- Excessive jurisdiction or excessive authority by the arbitral tribunal.
- Violation of due process, such as denying a party the opportunity to present its case.
- Contravention of public policy in China.
- The court's review is limited, and it does not re-examine the merits of the case.
4. Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
Domestic Arbitral Awards
- Domestic arbitral awards made within China are directly enforceable by Chinese courts. If a party does not comply with an award voluntarily, the prevailing party can seek enforcement through the courts.
Foreign Arbitral Awards
- As a signatory to the New York Convention, China recognizes and enforces foreign arbitral awards in accordance with the treaty. Foreign arbitral awards can be enforced in China, subject to limited exceptions such as if the award violates Chinese public policy.
- Courts in China are generally supportive of foreign arbitral awards, though enforcement may sometimes take longer due to the need for judicial review.
5. Arbitration Institutions in China
China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
CIETAC is the most prominent arbitration institution in China. It offers a set of comprehensive arbitration rules and handles a large number of international and domestic commercial disputes. CIETAC is highly regarded for its professionalism and efficiency, particularly in trade, investment, and commercial disputes.
Beijing Arbitration Commission (BAC)
Another important arbitration institution in China is the Beijing Arbitration Commission, which specializes in resolving disputes related to commercial contracts, real estate, and investment.
Shanghai International Arbitration Center (SHIAC)
The Shanghai International Arbitration Center (SHIAC) is a key institution based in Shanghai that handles international and cross-border disputes, particularly in areas such as maritime and international trade.
International Institutions
Chinese parties may also opt to resolve disputes through international institutions such as:
- International Chamber of Commerce (ICC).
- London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA).
- Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC).
These institutions are recognized globally and provide a neutral forum for resolving international disputes in China.
6. Advantages of Arbitration in China
International Recognition
Arbitration in China, particularly through CIETAC and other major institutions, benefits from international recognition and enforceability of awards, especially with China being a signatory to the New York Convention.
Efficient Legal Framework
China has a modern, efficient, and flexible arbitration framework that aligns with international standards, providing a reliable mechanism for both domestic and international dispute resolution.
Supportive Courts
The Chinese courts are generally supportive of the arbitration process, enforcing arbitration agreements, assisting with the appointment of arbitrators, and recognizing and enforcing arbitral awards.
Cost-Effectiveness
Arbitration in China is often considered a cost-effective alternative to litigation, particularly when compared to other international arbitration hubs.
7. Challenges and Considerations
Complex Enforcement of Foreign Awards
While China is a signatory to the New York Convention, the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards can sometimes be complex and time-consuming, especially in cases where public policy issues are raised.
Political and Cultural Factors
The political landscape in China may sometimes influence arbitration, particularly in cases involving state-owned enterprises (SOEs) or sensitive matters. However, the legal framework for arbitration is largely independent and internationalized.
Language and Legal Culture
While Mandarin Chinese is the official language for domestic arbitration, international parties may face challenges in terms of language barriers or cultural differences in understanding procedural nuances.
Conclusion
China has a robust and modern arbitration framework that is well-suited to handle both domestic and international commercial disputes. The Arbitration Law of the PRC, along with the rules of major arbitration institutions like CIETAC, ensures that arbitration in China is a reliable and efficient process for resolving commercial disputes. The country's active participation in international treaties, such as the New York Convention, further supports China's role as a key player in global arbitration.
RELATED Blog
0 comments