Arbitration Law in Bhutan
Arbitration Law in Bhutan
Bhutan's legal system for arbitration is still evolving, and while it is not as well-established as in some other jurisdictions, there has been progress in recognizing arbitration as an effective means of dispute resolution, especially in commercial matters. Bhutan has made strides in aligning its laws with international norms, but its framework remains relatively limited in scope compared to other jurisdictions with more extensive arbitration laws.
1. Legal Framework
Civil and Criminal Procedure Code (2001)
- Bhutan’s Civil and Criminal Procedure Code (2001) contains some provisions related to arbitration, although it does not have a dedicated arbitration law like other countries. Arbitration provisions are included under the Chapter on Settlement of Disputes.
- Under the Civil and Criminal Procedure Code, disputes that are not of a criminal nature and fall under the scope of civil or commercial matters may be resolved through arbitration, as long as the parties have agreed to arbitrate.
Arbitration and Conciliation Act of India (1996)
- Although Bhutan does not have its own comprehensive arbitration law, it relies in part on the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996, which is applied to matters where arbitration is agreed upon between parties. This reflects Bhutan's legal ties to India, as both countries share close historical, cultural, and legal ties.
- Bhutanese courts may refer to the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act when addressing arbitration issues. The Act provides a framework for domestic and international arbitration and sets out the enforcement of awards, making it a useful reference in Bhutan’s legal system.
New York Convention
- Bhutan is not currently a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958), which means it is not obligated to recognize and enforce arbitral awards made in other countries that are parties to the Convention.
- However, Bhutan's legal system is evolving, and in the future, it may consider aligning with international frameworks to facilitate cross-border arbitration.
2. Key Features of Arbitration in Bhutan
Arbitration Agreement
- An arbitration agreement in Bhutan must be in writing, and it should clearly express the parties' intention to resolve their disputes through arbitration rather than litigation. It is common for the arbitration agreement to be part of a larger contract between the parties.
- The agreement should also address the key aspects of the arbitration process, such as:
- Seat of arbitration.
- Arbitration rules (e.g., UNCITRAL, Indian Arbitration Rules).
- Appointment of arbitrators.
Party Autonomy
- Bhutan recognizes party autonomy in arbitration, allowing the parties to determine the rules, procedure, and the number of arbitrators. However, this must be in line with Bhutanese public policy and laws.
- Indian arbitration laws that are applied in Bhutan also uphold party autonomy, allowing the parties considerable freedom in structuring the arbitration process.
Arbitral Tribunal
- The arbitrators are usually appointed according to the terms specified in the arbitration agreement. If the parties cannot agree on the appointment of an arbitrator, they can request the court to assist in the appointment process.
- Arbitrators must act impartially, and if a challenge is made to their impartiality or independence, the parties may request their removal or replacement.
Judicial Intervention
- Bhutanese courts generally respect the principle of minimal judicial intervention in arbitration, as per international standards. However, courts may intervene in certain situations, such as:
- Enforcing an arbitration agreement if one party refuses to comply.
- Assisting in the appointment of arbitrators if the parties cannot agree.
- Setting aside or refusing enforcement of an arbitral award on limited grounds, such as public policy violations or procedural fairness.
3. Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
Domestic Awards
- Domestic arbitral awards in Bhutan are enforceable under the Civil and Criminal Procedure Code. After an award is made, the party seeking to enforce it can apply to the Bhutanese courts for enforcement, provided there are no valid grounds to oppose the award.
- Grounds for challenging the enforcement of domestic awards may include procedural defects, lack of impartiality of the arbitrator, or violations of public policy.
Foreign Awards
- Bhutan is not a signatory to the New York Convention, so foreign arbitral awards are not automatically enforceable in Bhutan under international conventions. However, it is possible for foreign awards to be enforced in Bhutan under certain conditions if the parties agree to this in advance.
- Bhutan’s reliance on the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act means that foreign arbitral awards may be enforceable to some extent if the parties' agreement provides for enforcement in accordance with Indian law, which follows the New York Convention. However, without a formal agreement between the parties or specific bilateral treaties, enforcement remains a challenge.
4. Arbitration Institutions in Bhutan
No Major Arbitration Institutions
- Bhutan does not yet have any prominent national arbitration institutions or specialized centers dedicated to arbitration, such as the ICC or the LCIA.
- As the country develops its legal infrastructure, the establishment of a local arbitration institution may be a future possibility. Until then, parties in Bhutan may resort to arbitration institutions in neighboring countries, such as India, to resolve their disputes.
Ad Hoc Arbitration
- Due to the lack of a formalized arbitration infrastructure in Bhutan, ad hoc arbitration may be a more common form of dispute resolution. In such cases, the parties may agree to arbitrate based on their selected rules, such as the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, Indian Arbitration Rules, or other agreed procedures.
5. Challenges and Considerations
- Limited Legal Framework
- Bhutan’s arbitration framework is currently underdeveloped, especially when compared to other jurisdictions in the region. The absence of a comprehensive national arbitration law means that parties may need to rely on foreign laws (particularly Indian law) or ad hoc arbitration procedures.
- Lack of International Recognition
- Since Bhutan is not a signatory to the New York Convention, it faces challenges in ensuring that foreign arbitral awards are automatically enforceable in the country. This makes Bhutan less attractive as a venue for international arbitration.
- Future Developments
- Bhutan’s legal system may evolve in the future to provide a more robust framework for domestic and international arbitration. There is potential for greater integration into the global arbitration community, especially as Bhutan continues to modernize its legal infrastructure.
6. Arbitration in Bhutan for International Disputes
Growing Economy and Need for Dispute Resolution
- Bhutan’s economy is growing, and with that growth comes an increased need for dispute resolution mechanisms, including arbitration. As more international business enters Bhutan, arbitration may become a more popular tool for resolving disputes in sectors such as construction, energy, trade, and finance.
Cross-Border Arbitration
- Given Bhutan's position in South Asia, cross-border arbitration may involve neighboring countries such as India and China. Parties from these countries may look to Bhutan as a potential venue for arbitration, though the country’s lack of a formal arbitration law and infrastructure may pose challenges for now.
Conclusion
Bhutan’s arbitration law is still in the early stages of development. While the Civil and Criminal Procedure Code (2001) includes provisions for arbitration and Indian arbitration law plays a role, Bhutan lacks a dedicated and comprehensive arbitration law. The absence of formal arbitration institutions and the lack of New York Convention membership further limit the country’s attractiveness for international arbitration. However, Bhutan’s growing economy and potential for legal reform suggest that arbitration could play an increasing role in dispute resolution in the future.
RELATED Blog
0 comments