Arbitration Law in Lithuania
Arbitration Law in Lithuania
Lithuania has a well-established legal framework for arbitration, in line with international standards, particularly through its adherence to the UNCITRAL Model Law and the New York Convention. The country's legal provisions ensure that arbitration is an efficient, impartial, and fair method for resolving disputes, both domestically and internationally.
1. Legal Framework
Lithuanian Code of Civil Procedure (CCP): The primary law governing arbitration in Lithuania is the Lithuanian Code of Civil Procedure. The CCP’s provisions on arbitration are consistent with international best practices and the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. It sets out the framework for arbitration agreements, the appointment of arbitrators, the procedure for conducting arbitration, and the recognition and enforcement of awards.
International Conventions:
- New York Convention (1958): Lithuania is a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. This means that Lithuania will enforce foreign arbitral awards in accordance with the Convention, making it a favorable destination for international arbitration.
- European Convention on International Commercial Arbitration (1961): Lithuania is also a signatory to this convention, which promotes harmonization of arbitration procedures within Europe and eases the process of cross-border commercial arbitration.
UNCITRAL Model Law: Lithuania's arbitration law generally follows the provisions of the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. This includes the rules regarding the formation of the arbitration agreement, the powers of arbitrators, the conduct of arbitral proceedings, and the enforcement of arbitral awards.
2. Types of Arbitration
Domestic Arbitration: This involves arbitration between parties based within Lithuania. The Lithuanian legal framework provides flexibility in the arbitration process, allowing parties to choose their arbitrators, arbitration rules, and procedures.
International Arbitration: Lithuania encourages international arbitration, particularly in commercial disputes. Its alignment with the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law makes it an attractive forum for resolving international disputes.
3. Arbitration Agreement
Form: Arbitration agreements in Lithuania must be in writing. These agreements can be standalone or part of a broader contract. The agreement can also be concluded through electronic means, such as email or digital signatures, provided that the intent to arbitrate is clear.
Enforceability: Arbitration agreements are enforceable in Lithuania. If one party refuses to comply with the arbitration agreement, the other party can apply to the courts to compel arbitration. Lithuanian courts may intervene if the agreement is invalid or if the dispute falls outside the scope of the arbitration agreement.
4. Arbitration Procedure
Arbitrators: In Lithuania, parties have the freedom to select their arbitrators. If they cannot agree on arbitrators, the court can appoint them. The number of arbitrators is typically agreed upon by the parties, but if they cannot decide, the CCP provides for the appointment of a sole arbitrator or a panel of three arbitrators.
Institutional vs. Ad Hoc Arbitration: Arbitration can be conducted under the rules of an arbitration institution (e.g., Vilnius Court of Commercial Arbitration (VCCA), ICC, or LCIA) or through an ad hoc procedure. The choice of rules is determined by the agreement between the parties.
Conduct of Arbitration: The arbitration procedure is generally governed by the agreement between the parties and the arbitrators. If no procedural rules are specified, the arbitrators will have the authority to determine the process. Lithuania’s legal framework allows flexibility in the conduct of arbitration, including the venue, language, and timelines of the proceedings.
5. Court Intervention
Arbitration Agreements: Courts in Lithuania support arbitration and will enforce valid arbitration agreements. They may intervene if a party refuses to honor the agreement or if an arbitration agreement is challenged.
Interim Measures: Lithuanian courts have the authority to issue interim measures during arbitration to preserve the rights of parties. For example, the courts may issue injunctions or orders for the preservation of evidence.
Setting Aside Arbitral Awards: A party can challenge an arbitral award before the Lithuanian courts under limited grounds, such as:
- Lack of jurisdiction.
- Failure to comply with due process (e.g., denial of the right to present one's case).
- The award is contrary to public policy.
- Invalidity of the arbitration agreement.
- Improper appointment of arbitrators.
However, the grounds for setting aside an award are limited, in line with international arbitration practices.
6. Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
Domestic Arbitral Awards: Arbitral awards made in Lithuania are enforceable within the country. A party seeking enforcement can apply to Lithuanian courts for recognition and enforcement. Courts will generally enforce awards unless there are compelling reasons, such as non-compliance with the arbitration agreement or violation of public policy.
Foreign Arbitral Awards: As a signatory to the New York Convention, Lithuania will recognize and enforce foreign arbitral awards, subject to the grounds for refusal in the Convention. This means that awards made in other jurisdictions that are party to the New York Convention can be enforced in Lithuania, provided that the awards do not conflict with Lithuanian public policy.
7. Challenges and Opportunities
Challenges
Limited Arbitration Institutions: While Lithuania has a modern legal framework for arbitration, the number of established arbitration institutions is fewer compared to jurisdictions like Switzerland or the UK. This might limit some options for parties seeking institutional arbitration.
Cost and Complexity: Although arbitration is generally considered more efficient than litigation, the cost and complexity of arbitration may still present challenges for smaller businesses or parties with limited resources.
Opportunities
Increasing Use of Arbitration: Lithuania is becoming more attractive as a venue for international arbitration, particularly due to its membership in international conventions and its modern arbitration law. The country has the potential to develop as a regional arbitration center, especially for disputes involving businesses from the European Union and neighboring countries.
Strong Legal Environment: Lithuania’s strong legal environment, stable economy, and adherence to international standards in arbitration create a favorable backdrop for both domestic and international arbitration.
8. Conclusion
Lithuania offers a modern and comprehensive arbitration framework that is consistent with international practices. With the support of the New York Convention and the UNCITRAL Model Law, the country provides an attractive jurisdiction for both domestic and international arbitration. While there are challenges such as the limited number of established arbitration institutions, Lithuania’s legal framework and commitment to enforcing arbitral awards make it a strong jurisdiction for arbitration. It has the potential to further develop as an arbitration hub in the region.
RELATED Blog
0 comments