Arbitration Law in Thailand
Arbitration Law in Thailand is primarily governed by the Arbitration Act B.E. 2545 (2002), which is aligned with international best practices, notably the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. The law provides a comprehensive framework for both domestic and international arbitration. Thailand is also a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958), which facilitates the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Thailand.
Key Features of Arbitration Law in Thailand:
1. Legal Framework
- Arbitration Act B.E. 2545 (2002): This is the primary legislation governing arbitration in Thailand, providing rules and procedures for arbitration in both domestic and international contexts.
- UNCITRAL Model Law: The Arbitration Act is largely based on the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (1985), ensuring that Thai arbitration laws align with international standards.
- New York Convention: Thailand is a signatory to the New York Convention, and thus, it recognizes and enforces foreign arbitral awards, provided they do not contravene Thai public policy.
2. Arbitration Agreement
- Written Agreement: An arbitration agreement must be in writing. This can be a separate agreement or a clause within a larger contract. The agreement must indicate the intention of the parties to resolve disputes through arbitration.
- Scope of the Agreement: The arbitration agreement must clearly define the scope of the disputes to be resolved by arbitration. The Thai courts generally uphold the validity of arbitration agreements, compelling arbitration if one party refuses to arbitrate.
3. Arbitral Tribunal
- Number of Arbitrators: The parties are free to decide the number of arbitrators, which is typically one or three.
- Appointment of Arbitrators: The parties are generally free to appoint arbitrators of their choice. If the parties cannot agree, the court or an arbitration institution may appoint the arbitrators. The Thailand Arbitration Center (THAC) and the Thai Arbitration Institute (TAI) can assist with appointments.
- Impartiality and Independence: Arbitrators must act impartially and independently. They are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest and may be disqualified if they are found to be biased.
- Qualifications: While the law does not set specific qualifications for arbitrators, it is common for arbitrators to have expertise in the relevant field (e.g., commercial, construction, etc.).
4. Arbitration Procedure
- Party Autonomy: Thai law emphasizes party autonomy in arbitration, meaning the parties have significant freedom to decide on procedural matters such as the seat of arbitration, language, and applicable law.
- Institutional and Ad Hoc Arbitration: Thailand permits both institutional arbitration and ad hoc arbitration. The Thailand Arbitration Center (THAC) and the Thai Arbitration Institute (TAI) are the primary institutions that administer institutional arbitration in Thailand.
- Language of Arbitration: The parties are free to choose the language of arbitration, though English is commonly used in international disputes, while Thai is used in domestic arbitrations.
- Interim Measures: Arbitrators in Thailand have the authority to grant interim measures, such as freezing assets or ordering injunctive relief, during the course of arbitration. Thai courts can also assist in enforcing interim measures if required.
- Confidentiality: Arbitration proceedings are generally confidential under Thai law. The parties may also agree on specific confidentiality terms regarding the disclosure of information during the arbitration process.
5. Arbitral Awards
- Final and Binding: Arbitral awards are final and binding on the parties, and there is generally no scope for appeal except in limited circumstances (e.g., if the award was procured by fraud or the tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction).
- Types of Remedies: Arbitral tribunals can grant a wide range of remedies, including monetary compensation, specific performance, and injunctive relief.
- Written Award: The tribunal must provide a written award explaining the reasoning behind its decision.
- Time Limit for Award: The arbitration award must generally be issued within six months from the date the tribunal is constituted. The deadline can be extended if both parties agree or if the tribunal determines it needs more time.
6. Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
- Domestic Awards: Thai law allows for the enforcement of domestic arbitral awards. A party can apply to the Thai courts for enforcement if the opposing party refuses to comply with the award.
- Foreign Awards: As Thailand is a signatory to the New York Convention, it recognizes and enforces foreign arbitral awards, subject to the condition that they do not contravene Thai public policy.
- Grounds for Refusal: The enforcement of foreign arbitral awards may be refused by Thai courts if:
- The award is contrary to Thai public policy (ordre public).
- The subject matter of the dispute is not arbitrable under Thai law.
- The arbitration procedure was not in accordance with the agreement of the parties.
- There was a lack of due process (e.g., a party was not given proper notice or was unable to present its case).
7. Judicial Review and Setting Aside of Awards
- Limited Judicial Review: Thai courts have limited powers to review arbitral awards. Grounds for setting aside an award include:
- Excess of jurisdiction by the arbitrators.
- Serious procedural irregularities, such as lack of notice or violation of due process.
- The award is in contravention of Thai public policy.
- Time Limit for Challenge: A party wishing to challenge an award in court must do so within 90 days from the date of receiving the award.
8. Role of Courts in Arbitration
- Supportive Role: Thai courts play a supportive role in the arbitration process. They assist in enforcing arbitration agreements, appointing arbitrators, and granting interim measures if necessary.
- Stay of Court Proceedings: If a valid arbitration agreement exists, the courts will generally stay any court proceedings and refer the parties to arbitration.
- Judicial Assistance: Thai courts may also assist in the enforcement of arbitral awards and interim measures.
9. Arbitration Institutions in Thailand
- Thailand Arbitration Center (THAC): The Thailand Arbitration Center (THAC) is one of the leading institutions for institutional arbitration in Thailand. It administers both domestic and international arbitrations and provides a range of arbitration-related services, including appointing arbitrators and enforcing awards.
- Thai Arbitration Institute (TAI): The Thai Arbitration Institute is another key institution in Thailand that administers arbitration under the rules of the Thai Chamber of Commerce. It is recognized for managing both domestic and international arbitration cases.
- Other Institutions: Thailand also permits the use of international arbitration institutions, such as the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), and the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC), for cross-border disputes.
10. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
- Modernization of Arbitration Laws: The Arbitration Act B.E. 2545 (2002) was amended to enhance Thailand's legal framework for arbitration, reflecting an effort to modernize arbitration laws in line with international standards. Further reforms may occur to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the arbitration process.
- Promotion of Thailand as an Arbitration Hub: Thailand aims to promote itself as an arbitration hub in Southeast Asia, particularly in commercial and investment disputes. With its proximity to major economic centers in Asia, it is increasingly viewed as a viable venue for arbitration.
- Growth in International Arbitrations: With Thailand's growing participation in international trade and investment, there has been an increase in the number of international arbitrations taking place in Thailand, and the legal and institutional frameworks are evolving to accommodate this demand.
Conclusion
Thailand's Arbitration Act B.E. 2545 (2002) provides a robust and modern framework for resolving disputes through arbitration, aligned with UNCITRAL standards. The law is designed to support both domestic and international arbitration, ensuring that Thailand is an attractive venue for dispute resolution in Southeast Asia. With a growing number of arbitration institutions and the country's commitment to upholding international conventions, Thailand is positioning itself as a key player in the global arbitration landscape. However, practical issues related to enforcement and judicial interpretation may require further attention to enhance Thailand's reputation as an arbitration hub.
RELATED Blog
0 comments