Arbitration Law in East Timor
Arbitration Law in East Timor (Timor-Leste)
Timor-Leste (also known as East Timor) has a developing legal framework for arbitration, which is primarily governed by national laws influenced by international arbitration standards. While the country has made significant strides in establishing a legal system conducive to business and trade, arbitration remains relatively underdeveloped compared to more established jurisdictions.
1. Legal Framework for Arbitration in Timor-Leste
East Timor's arbitration law is outlined in the Code of Civil Procedure, and the country has made efforts to align with international practices through its commitment to various international treaties.
Code of Civil Procedure:
The Code of Civil Procedure of Timor-Leste includes provisions on arbitration, but the framework is not as comprehensive as that of more developed jurisdictions. The provisions in the Code follow general principles of arbitration, including party autonomy, the requirement for written agreements, and the enforcement of awards, but there is still room for improvement.
Law No. 13/2005 on Arbitration:
In 2005, Timor-Leste enacted Law No. 13/2005 on Arbitration, which aims to establish a legal foundation for the practice of arbitration in the country. This law governs arbitration procedures and aligns with international norms, such as the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, although its application and implementation have been relatively slow.
International Treaties:
Timor-Leste is a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958), which ensures the enforceability of foreign arbitral awards within Timor-Leste, subject to certain exceptions. This international treaty provides a strong basis for the enforcement of arbitral awards, fostering confidence in the country’s commitment to global arbitration standards.
2. Arbitration Agreement and Procedure
Arbitration Agreement
Arbitration in Timor-Leste is initiated through a written arbitration agreement, which can be a standalone contract or a clause within a larger agreement. The arbitration agreement must be in writing, and both parties must consent to arbitrate disputes in accordance with the agreed terms. The agreement should ideally include:
- The arbitration clause, specifying the procedures and rules that will govern the arbitration.
- The seat of arbitration (the location where the arbitration will take place).
- The choice of law governing the arbitration, whether Timor-Leste’s laws or another jurisdiction's law.
- The number of arbitrators (usually one or three).
Arbitration Procedure
The procedure for arbitration in Timor-Leste is largely governed by the terms agreed upon by the parties and the provisions of Law No. 13/2005. Key aspects of the arbitration process include:
- Appointment of Arbitrators: If the parties cannot agree on the appointment of arbitrators, the court may appoint them or an institution may do so, as per the arbitration agreement or legal provisions.
- Rules of Procedure: The parties are free to agree on the rules of procedure to be followed during the arbitration. The UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules or the rules of an international institution like the ICC can be chosen, or the parties can opt for ad hoc rules.
- Language of Arbitration: The parties are free to determine the language of arbitration. If no agreement is reached, the arbitral tribunal determines the language.
3. Judicial Intervention in Arbitration
As is common in many international arbitration systems, judicial intervention in Timor-Leste is limited to specific cases, primarily ensuring that the arbitration process is followed properly. However, courts can intervene in certain situations:
Compelling Arbitration: If one party refuses to participate in arbitration despite agreeing to it, the other party can seek to compel arbitration through the courts.
Appointment of Arbitrators: If the parties cannot agree on the selection of arbitrators, the courts or an arbitration institution may step in to appoint them.
Interim Measures: The courts may also grant interim measures to preserve the status quo or protect the rights of the parties during the arbitration proceedings.
Setting Aside an Award: If an arbitral award is challenged, the courts in Timor-Leste can set aside the award under limited circumstances, such as:
- Invalid Arbitration Agreement: If the arbitration agreement is found to be invalid.
- Jurisdictional Issues: If the arbitral tribunal exceeds its jurisdiction.
- Public Policy Violations: If the award violates public policy in Timor-Leste.
4. Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
Domestic Awards
Arbitral awards rendered in Timor-Leste are enforceable within the country. The Code of Civil Procedure and Law No. 13/2005 set out the mechanisms for enforcement, which generally require the party seeking enforcement to submit a certified copy of the arbitral award and a certified copy of the arbitration agreement to the courts. The courts may refuse enforcement in cases where there are valid grounds for refusal, such as violation of public policy.
Foreign Arbitral Awards
As Timor-Leste is a signatory to the New York Convention, foreign arbitral awards are enforceable in the country, provided they meet the necessary criteria. To enforce a foreign award, the party seeking enforcement must submit a request to the court, along with:
- A copy of the arbitral award and the arbitration agreement.
- Evidence that the award is final and binding.
- A certificate of the award from the jurisdiction where the award was made.
- Grounds for challenging enforcement are limited, and include situations where enforcement would contravene the public policy of Timor-Leste or violate basic principles of due process.
5. Arbitration Institutions in Timor-Leste
As of now, Timor-Leste does not have a well-established local arbitration institution. However, international arbitration institutions are often chosen by parties to handle arbitration cases involving Timor-Leste. Some of the institutions and resources available include:
International Arbitration Institutions:
Parties may choose to arbitrate under the rules of established international arbitration bodies such as:
- International Chamber of Commerce (ICC).
- London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA).
- Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC).
Ad Hoc Arbitration:
Parties can also opt for ad hoc arbitration, following internationally recognized rules such as the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules.
6. Advantages of Arbitration in Timor-Leste
International Recognition of Awards:
As a member of the New York Convention, Timor-Leste provides a strong framework for the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, which can be crucial for international business transactions.
Flexibility:
The parties to a dispute in Timor-Leste have a high degree of autonomy in choosing the rules and procedures for arbitration, which is particularly advantageous in international commercial disputes.
Access to International Arbitration Frameworks:
Timor-Leste’s alignment with the UNCITRAL Model Law and its participation in the New York Convention enable it to integrate with global arbitration practices and appeal to international investors and businesses.
7. Challenges of Arbitration in Timor-Leste
Underdeveloped Arbitration Infrastructure:
While Timor-Leste has the legal framework for arbitration, the country lacks an established and well-known domestic arbitration institution, which may make arbitration less accessible compared to other jurisdictions with robust arbitration facilities.
Limited Local Arbitration Expertise:
The pool of local arbitrators with international experience is still growing, meaning that parties may often have to rely on international arbitrators, which could increase the cost and complexity of disputes.
Practical Implementation Issues:
While the legal framework is in place, the practical application of arbitration may face challenges, particularly in terms of enforcement and the willingness of local courts to support arbitration proceedings.
Conclusion
Timor-Leste has made important progress in establishing a legal framework for arbitration, particularly through Law No. 13/2005 and its adherence to international treaties like the New York Convention. While the country offers a solid foundation for both domestic and international arbitration, there are still challenges, such as limited infrastructure, judicial support, and local expertise. Arbitration remains an attractive alternative for resolving disputes, especially for international businesses, but stakeholders may face challenges in terms of practical implementation and enforcement.
RELATED Blog
0 comments