Arbitration Law in Guyana
Arbitration Law in Guyana
Guyana, located in the northern part of South America, has a developing legal framework for arbitration. Arbitration is recognized as an important tool for resolving disputes, especially in commercial, construction, and investment-related matters. The country has made efforts to align its legal framework with international standards to facilitate both domestic and international arbitration.
1. Legal Framework for Arbitration in Guyana
Guyana's arbitration laws are primarily governed by the Arbitration Act of 1991, which provides the legal basis for domestic and international arbitration. The framework is largely based on the UNCITRAL Model Law and incorporates international principles to ensure fairness and efficiency in arbitration proceedings.
Arbitration Act of 1991: The Arbitration Act was enacted to regulate the conduct of arbitration in Guyana. The law is aligned with the UNCITRAL Model Law and covers the appointment of arbitrators, arbitration agreements, and the enforcement of arbitral awards.
UNCITRAL Model Law: The law reflects the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, which ensures that Guyana's arbitration process is compatible with international standards.
New York Convention (1958): Guyana is a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, which allows for the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards made in other countries that are also parties to the Convention. This is particularly relevant for international commercial disputes.
2. Arbitration Agreement
Written Form: Under the Arbitration Act, an arbitration agreement must be in writing. This can be done through an arbitration clause in a contract or a separate arbitration agreement.
Enforceability: Arbitration agreements are enforceable in Guyana. If one party refuses to participate in arbitration after agreeing to arbitrate, the other party can approach the court to compel arbitration.
Scope: Arbitration agreements in Guyana can cover a wide range of disputes, including commercial, contractual, investment, and construction matters. However, certain matters such as family law and employment disputes may not be suitable for arbitration.
3. Appointment of Arbitrators
Selection of Arbitrators: The parties in a dispute have the freedom to agree on the number and selection of arbitrators. Typically, one or three arbitrators are chosen. If the parties cannot agree on an arbitrator or panel, the court has the power to appoint arbitrators.
Impartiality and Independence: Arbitrators must be impartial and independent. Any party may challenge the appointment of an arbitrator if there are concerns about the neutrality or bias of the arbitrator.
Qualification: The qualifications of arbitrators are typically agreed upon by the parties. The Arbitration Act does not specify a particular qualification, but arbitrators should possess appropriate legal or technical expertise relevant to the dispute.
4. Arbitration Procedure
Flexibility: The Arbitration Act allows significant flexibility in the arbitration procedure. The parties can agree on the rules and procedures to be followed during the arbitration. If the parties do not agree on specific procedural matters, the arbitrators will set the procedure.
Place of Arbitration: The parties are free to choose the place of arbitration. If the parties cannot agree on a venue, the arbitrators will determine the location.
Language of Arbitration: The language of arbitration is usually agreed upon by the parties. If no language is agreed upon, the arbitrators will choose the language of the proceedings.
Interim Measures: The Arbitration Act allows arbitrators to issue interim measures to protect the rights of the parties during the arbitration process. This may include preserving evidence, preventing actions that may harm the other party, or securing assets.
5. Role of Courts in Arbitration
Judicial Support: Courts in Guyana generally take a supportive role in arbitration. The courts can intervene in limited circumstances, such as:
- Enforcing arbitration agreements (by compelling arbitration).
- Appointing arbitrators when the parties cannot agree.
- Confirming or setting aside awards on limited grounds, such as issues of jurisdiction or public policy violations.
Compelling Arbitration: If one party refuses to proceed with arbitration, the other party may apply to the High Court to compel the reluctant party to honor the arbitration agreement.
Setting Aside an Award: The courts can set aside an arbitral award on narrow grounds, such as:
- Lack of jurisdiction of the tribunal.
- Serious procedural defects or violations of due process.
- Public policy violations (e.g., where enforcement of the award would be contrary to the country’s public policy).
6. Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
Domestic Awards: Arbitral awards made in Guyana are enforceable in the country through the High Court. The award must be filed with the court, after which the court will issue a judgment confirming the award, making it enforceable like any other court judgment.
International Awards: Guyana is a signatory to the New York Convention, which means that foreign arbitral awards (made in other jurisdictions that are also signatories) are recognized and enforceable in Guyana. The New York Convention provides that foreign awards will be enforced unless there are specific grounds for refusal, such as a violation of public policy.
7. Confidentiality
Arbitration proceedings in Guyana are generally considered confidential, meaning that the details of the proceedings and the arbitral award are not disclosed to the public unless both parties agree otherwise.
- Exceptions to Confidentiality: In some cases, confidentiality may be waived, such as when the arbitration award needs to be used in court enforcement or when required by law.
8. Arbitration Institutions
While Guyana does not have a large number of domestic arbitration institutions, international institutions are often used for administering arbitration proceedings, particularly in commercial and investment disputes.
- International Arbitration Institutions: Commonly used institutions for arbitration in Guyana include:
- International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)
- London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA)
- United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL)
- Local Arbitration Bodies: Guyana is beginning to develop local arbitration facilities, but as of now, international institutions are often preferred, especially for large and complex disputes.
9. Challenges and Opportunities
Legal Infrastructure: While Guyana has made strides in developing a robust legal framework for arbitration, there may still be gaps in local infrastructure to support complex arbitration processes.
Capacity Building: There is an opportunity to further develop local arbitration expertise through training programs and international partnerships to support arbitration practices.
Increased Investment: As Guyana attracts more foreign investment, there will be a growing demand for alternative dispute resolution methods like arbitration. This can present an opportunity to enhance the arbitration system to cater to both domestic and international investors.
10. Conclusion
Arbitration in Guyana is governed by the Arbitration Act of 1991, which aligns with international standards, particularly the UNCITRAL Model Law and the New York Convention. The country's arbitration laws allow for flexibility and independence in the arbitration process, and international awards are enforceable under Guyana's legal system.
Although the local infrastructure for arbitration is still developing, Guyana's commitment to adhering to international arbitration norms makes it an attractive jurisdiction for resolving domestic and international disputes. With continued improvements in legal and institutional infrastructure, Guyana has the potential to become a more prominent hub for arbitration in South America and the Caribbean region.
RELATED Blog
0 comments