Arbitration Law in Eritrea
Arbitration Law in Eritrea
Eritrea has a relatively undeveloped arbitration framework compared to some other countries. However, the legal framework for arbitration exists, and the country does recognize arbitration as a viable mechanism for dispute resolution, particularly in commercial matters.
1. Legal Framework for Arbitration in Eritrea
Eritrea's arbitration framework is primarily governed by domestic laws and international conventions to which Eritrea may be a party. The core legal provisions regarding arbitration are not as robust or comprehensive as those in other jurisdictions, but there are certain laws that provide for arbitration procedures.
The Civil Code of Eritrea:
Eritrea’s Civil Code contains provisions that recognize the validity of arbitration agreements and procedures for resolving disputes through arbitration. However, arbitration is not as widely developed in Eritrea as in many other jurisdictions.
International Conventions:
Eritrea is a member of the United Nations and, therefore, a signatory to various international treaties and conventions. However, the country’s participation in specific international treaties related to arbitration, such as the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958), is unclear or may not be formally established.
2. Arbitration Agreements
The Civil Code of Eritrea allows the use of arbitration agreements, but the enforcement and general scope of arbitration law are less detailed than in other countries.
Arbitration Agreements:
In Eritrea, an arbitration agreement can be a part of a contract, stipulating that any dispute arising out of or in connection with the contract should be resolved through arbitration. However, due to the less detailed nature of the law, parties entering arbitration agreements in Eritrea may face challenges with enforcement if the procedures are not clearly outlined.
Scope of Arbitration:
Arbitration in Eritrea is typically used for commercial disputes. There may be limitations or restrictions on arbitration for certain types of disputes, particularly in family law, criminal law, or matters related to public policy. Specific details on the scope of arbitration are not thoroughly outlined in Eritrean law.
3. Arbitration Procedure
While Eritrean law acknowledges arbitration, it does not provide a detailed procedural framework for the arbitration process. However, the following elements are generally accepted in terms of arbitration proceedings:
Choice of Arbitrators:
The parties are free to select their own arbitrators. However, there may be limited institutions or arbitration bodies in Eritrea to facilitate the process. In cases where parties are unable to agree on arbitrators, it may be necessary to rely on the courts or appoint an arbitrator through a third party.
Arbitration Rules:
Eritrea does not have its own set of detailed arbitration rules like UNCITRAL or ICC rules. Consequently, parties may be inclined to adopt internationally recognized arbitration rules such as the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules or the Rules of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) to guide the arbitration process.
Place of Arbitration:
The parties to an arbitration agreement in Eritrea can agree on the seat of arbitration, which can be within Eritrea or abroad. If there is no agreement, the arbitrators would decide on the location of the arbitration.
Language of Arbitration:
Similar to the seat of arbitration, the parties can agree on the language to be used in the proceedings. In Eritrea, the official languages are Tigrinya, Arabic, and English, and one of these languages is typically chosen for arbitration unless otherwise agreed.
4. Judicial Intervention
Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements:
Eritrean law acknowledges arbitration agreements, but judicial intervention may be required if a party refuses to comply with an arbitration agreement. Courts can compel parties to arbitrate if there is a valid arbitration clause in place.
Court Intervention in the Arbitration Process:
Courts may be asked to intervene in certain cases, such as when a party refuses to participate in arbitration or to enforce interim measures to preserve assets during the arbitration process. However, the role of courts in arbitration in Eritrea may be limited, and courts may not always have the necessary expertise or experience to handle arbitration-related matters effectively.
Setting Aside an Arbitral Award:
If an arbitral award is issued in Eritrea or recognized in the country, the courts may set it aside under limited grounds, such as:
- Lack of Jurisdiction: If the arbitrators did not have jurisdiction over the dispute.
- Improper Composition of the Tribunal: If the tribunal was not composed according to the agreement of the parties or the law.
- Violation of Public Policy: If the award violates Eritrean public policy.
5. Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
Domestic Arbitral Awards:
Awards made within Eritrea are enforceable by Eritrean courts as long as the procedure followed aligns with the terms agreed to by the parties or the country's laws.
Foreign Arbitral Awards:
Eritrea may face challenges in recognizing and enforcing foreign arbitral awards because it is not clear if the country is a signatory to international conventions such as the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. As such, enforcement of foreign awards could be complicated if Eritrea does not have the formal framework for recognizing and enforcing foreign awards.
6. Arbitration Institutions
As of now, Eritrea does not have a robust set of established arbitration institutions like those in other countries. Therefore, businesses and parties seeking arbitration may need to rely on foreign arbitration institutions or international arbitration rules.
However, it is possible that local arbitration institutions may develop over time, especially as Eritrea strengthens its commercial and legal frameworks. International institutions such as UNCITRAL, ICC, or LCIA may be used to conduct arbitration involving Eritrean parties or disputes involving Eritrean law.
7. Challenges of Arbitration in Eritrea
Limited Arbitration Infrastructure:
Eritrea has a limited arbitration infrastructure, and the lack of dedicated institutions or detailed legal procedures may present challenges in conducting arbitration domestically.
Uncertainty Regarding Enforcement:
The uncertain status of Eritrea’s involvement in international conventions like the New York Convention means there may be challenges in enforcing foreign arbitral awards.
Lack of Expertise:
There is a lack of specialized arbitration practitioners and institutions within Eritrea, which could hinder the development of a more robust arbitration environment.
Legal Ambiguities:
The legal framework is not fully developed or comprehensive, and parties may face ambiguities when navigating the arbitration process, particularly regarding enforcement of awards or choosing the procedural rules.
8. Conclusion
Eritrea recognizes arbitration as a legitimate dispute resolution mechanism, and the Civil Code of Eritrea provides some foundation for arbitration agreements and enforcement. However, the country lacks a fully developed and comprehensive arbitration infrastructure, and there are significant gaps in legal and procedural frameworks. The absence of specialized institutions and clear enforcement mechanisms may pose challenges for parties seeking to resolve disputes through arbitration in Eritrea.
While the situation may improve with time, currently, businesses and individuals involved in arbitration in Eritrea may face challenges, especially in terms of enforcing foreign arbitral awards and the limited availability of arbitration institutions and expertise.
RELATED Blog
0 comments