Arbitration Law in Uganda
Arbitration Law in Uganda is governed by both domestic legislation and international treaties to which Uganda is a party. The primary legislation governing arbitration in Uganda is the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (ACA), which was enacted in 2000. This Act incorporates principles based on UNCITRAL (United Nations Commission on International Trade Law) model law and provides the framework for both domestic and international arbitration in Uganda.
Key Features of Arbitration Law in Uganda:
1. Legal Framework
- Arbitration and Conciliation Act (ACA): The Arbitration and Conciliation Act (Act No. 7 of 2000) is the primary law regulating arbitration in Uganda. It was enacted to govern both domestic and international arbitration. The Act adopts the principles of the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration and is designed to promote arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) method.
- New York Convention: Uganda is a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958), which facilitates the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Uganda.
- East African Community (EAC): As a member of the East African Community, Uganda also follows regional arbitration practices, particularly through the East African Court of Justice (EACJ) and the East African Arbitration Act.
2. Arbitration Agreement
- Written Agreement: Under the ACA, an arbitration agreement must be in writing to be valid. This can be a clause within a contract or a separate agreement between the parties.
- Scope of Arbitration: The arbitration agreement should specify the types of disputes that are subject to arbitration. The courts may intervene to determine whether a dispute falls within the scope of the arbitration agreement if there is any uncertainty.
- Enforceability: If an arbitration agreement exists, the courts in Uganda will generally uphold it and refer the parties to arbitration, staying judicial proceedings.
3. Arbitral Tribunal
- Number of Arbitrators: The parties to an arbitration are free to determine the number of arbitrators, typically either one or three. If the parties cannot agree on the number of arbitrators, the court or an arbitral institution can decide.
- Appointment of Arbitrators: Arbitrators are appointed by the parties. If the parties cannot agree on the appointment, the court may intervene and make the appointment.
- Independence and Impartiality: Arbitrators must be independent and impartial. Parties may challenge an arbitrator’s appointment if they have reasons to believe the arbitrator is biased.
- Qualifications: There are no strict qualification requirements for arbitrators in Uganda, but they are typically chosen based on their expertise in the subject matter of the dispute.
4. Arbitration Procedure
- Party Autonomy: Like most arbitration regimes, Uganda allows party autonomy in determining the arbitration procedure, such as the choice of rules (e.g., UNCITRAL Rules, ICC Rules, LCIA Rules) and the seat of arbitration.
- Institutional and Ad Hoc Arbitration: Uganda permits both institutional and ad hoc arbitration. For institutional arbitration, parties can refer to institutions like the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), or Uganda Arbitration Centre (UAC). For ad hoc arbitration, the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules are often used.
- Interim Measures: The ACA provides that an arbitral tribunal has the authority to grant interim measures of protection, such as asset freezing orders or injunctions, to preserve the rights of the parties during the arbitration process. Courts in Uganda also have the power to enforce such interim measures.
- Confidentiality: Arbitration proceedings in Uganda are generally confidential, though the parties can waive this confidentiality by mutual agreement or in cases where the disclosure is required for the enforcement of the award.
5. Arbitral Awards
- Binding and Final: Arbitral awards are final and binding on the parties once issued. There are limited grounds for challenging an award in Uganda, which are typically based on procedural irregularities or violations of public policy.
- Written Award: The arbitral award must be in writing and signed by the arbitrators. The award must also include a reasoned decision unless the parties agree otherwise.
- Monetary and Non-Monetary Remedies: The arbitral tribunal can award both monetary (e.g., damages) and non-monetary remedies (e.g., injunctions, specific performance), depending on the nature of the dispute.
- Time Limit for Award: The tribunal is expected to issue an award within a reasonable time frame. The ACA provides for a maximum period of 12 months from the commencement of the arbitration for the award to be made, though this period can be extended with the consent of the parties.
6. Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
- Domestic Awards: Domestic arbitral awards are enforceable in Uganda under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. A party seeking enforcement must apply to the High Court for recognition and enforcement.
- Foreign Awards: Since Uganda is a signatory to the New York Convention, foreign arbitral awards are generally enforceable in Uganda under the terms of the Convention, unless enforcement would be contrary to public policy.
- Recognition Process: A party seeking to enforce a foreign arbitral award must apply to the High Court of Uganda. The court will assess whether the award meets the requirements of the New York Convention and whether enforcement would violate public policy.
7. Judicial Review and Setting Aside of Awards
- Limited Judicial Review: Ugandan courts have limited grounds on which they can review or set aside arbitral awards. Grounds for setting aside an award include:
- Excess of Jurisdiction: If the arbitral tribunal exceeds its powers.
- Procedural Irregularities: If the arbitration process was fundamentally flawed, such as a failure to provide proper notice or conduct a fair hearing.
- Violation of Public Policy: If the award is contrary to Uganda’s public policy.
- Setting Aside Process: A party wishing to challenge or set aside an arbitral award must file a petition with the High Court of Uganda within 90 days from the date of the award.
8. Role of Courts in Arbitration
- Supportive Role: The courts in Uganda play a supportive role in arbitration, particularly in appointing arbitrators, enforcing arbitration agreements, and granting interim measures of protection.
- Stay of Proceedings: If there is a valid arbitration agreement, the court will typically stay any judicial proceedings and refer the matter to arbitration.
- Interim Measures: The courts have the power to issue interim measures and support the enforcement of measures ordered by the arbitral tribunal.
9. Arbitration Institutions in Uganda
- Uganda Arbitration Centre (UAC): The Uganda Arbitration Centre is a national institution that provides arbitration and ADR services in Uganda. It administers both domestic and international arbitration and offers facilities for institutional arbitration.
- International Institutions: International arbitration institutions such as the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), and UNCITRAL rules are frequently used in Uganda for cross-border disputes.
10. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
- Growth of Arbitration: Arbitration is increasingly being used in Uganda to resolve commercial, investment, and construction disputes. The government of Uganda is committed to enhancing its arbitration framework to support its growing economy.
- Arbitration Reforms: There have been ongoing discussions about modernizing Uganda’s arbitration laws, including updating the Arbitration and Conciliation Act to better align with international best practices and standards.
- Regional Arbitration Hub: Uganda is working towards establishing itself as a regional arbitration hub within the East African Community, and this could drive the growth of arbitration as a preferred dispute resolution method in the region.
Conclusion
Uganda's Arbitration Law is primarily governed by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (2000), which follows the principles of the UNCITRAL Model Law and is designed to promote domestic and international arbitration. The law is supported by the New York Convention, which facilitates the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. Courts in Uganda play a supportive role in the arbitration process, assisting with the appointment of arbitrators, granting interim measures, and enforcing awards. Arbitration is increasingly used for commercial disputes, and Uganda is positioning itself as an emerging arbitration hub in East Africa.
RELATED Blog
0 comments