Arbitration Law in Comoros
Arbitration Law in Comoros
The Comoros is a small island nation located in the Indian Ocean, which has been gradually integrating arbitration as a means of resolving commercial disputes. The legal framework for arbitration in Comoros is still developing, and it relies heavily on general principles of civil and commercial law, along with international conventions that the country has ratified.
As of now, the Comoros has limited domestic legislation specifically governing arbitration. However, its legal approach to arbitration is influenced by French law (due to historical ties with France) and international arbitration norms.
1. Legal Framework for Arbitration in Comoros
The Arbitration Law in Comoros is not fully developed as a standalone system. However, certain aspects of arbitration are covered under the country’s broader civil and commercial laws. Comoros follows a civil law system, which means that arbitration is treated similarly to how it is treated in other civil law jurisdictions.
Key aspects of arbitration in Comoros include:
General Civil Code:
Comoros has a Civil Code that applies to most contractual and commercial disputes, including those resolved by arbitration. However, the Civil Code does not contain specific provisions dedicated exclusively to arbitration, so the general principles of contract law govern arbitration agreements and their enforceability.
International Treaties and Conventions:
Like many African nations, Comoros is a signatory to international treaties that govern arbitration. Key international treaties include:
- The New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958): Comoros is a party to this convention, which facilitates the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Comoros and vice versa.
- The OHADA Treaty (Organisation pour l'Harmonisation en Afrique du Droit des Affaires): Comoros is a member of the OHADA (Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa), which has its own set of rules and regulations, including provisions on arbitration. OHADA’s Uniform Act on Arbitration (2008) provides a framework for arbitration in the member states, which includes Comoros.
2. Arbitration Agreement and Procedure
Arbitration Agreement
- Arbitration in Comoros, like in other civil law jurisdictions, requires a valid arbitration agreement in writing. This can be included as a clause in a contract or as a standalone agreement.
- The agreement should specify the arbitral institution, seat of arbitration, and applicable rules for the arbitration proceedings.
Arbitral Tribunal
- The tribunal can be one or three arbitrators, depending on the agreement between the parties. If the parties do not agree on the number of arbitrators, typically, the tribunal will consist of three arbitrators.
- Appointment of Arbitrators: Arbitrators are generally chosen by the parties. If the parties cannot agree on the arbitrators, the appointed institution or the court can intervene to appoint the arbitrators.
Arbitration Procedure
- The arbitration procedure is flexible and can be tailored to the needs of the parties, as long as it complies with international principles. The parties are free to agree on the rules (e.g., UNCITRAL, ICC) and language of the arbitration, as well as the location for hearings.
- If the parties do not specify the rules, the tribunal may adopt its own procedures, subject to the legal framework and the principles of fairness.
3. Judicial Intervention in Arbitration
- Limited Judicial Intervention
- Comoros, like many civil law countries, adheres to a policy of limited judicial intervention in arbitration. Courts generally respect the autonomy of arbitral tribunals and intervene only in specific situations.
- Grounds for Court Intervention
Courts may intervene in the following situations:- Compelling Arbitration: If a party refuses to honor an arbitration agreement, the other party can request the court to compel arbitration.
- Appointment of Arbitrators: If the parties or institutions fail to appoint arbitrators, the courts may intervene and make the necessary appointments.
- Setting Aside an Award: A party may seek to set aside an arbitral award in the courts on limited grounds, such as:
- Lack of jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal.
- Violation of public policy.
- Excessive powers by the arbitrators.
- Enforcing an Award: Courts in Comoros can assist in the enforcement of an arbitral award, especially if the award is made in a country that is a party to the New York Convention.
4. Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
Domestic Awards
Domestic arbitral awards, when made in accordance with Comorian law and public policy, are generally enforceable within the country. However, Comoros lacks a detailed set of procedures for domestic arbitration enforcement, and parties may need to rely on international principles and treaties like the New York Convention.
Foreign Arbitral Awards
Comoros is a signatory to the New York Convention, which ensures that foreign arbitral awards are recognized and enforced in the country. This means that foreign awards can be enforced in Comoros if they meet the requirements under the convention, particularly:
- The award must be final and binding.
- The award must not violate Comorian public policy.
- The country where the award was made must also be a signatory to the New York Convention.
Recognition Process
To enforce a foreign award, the prevailing party must file a request with the Comorian courts. The court will review the award to ensure that it meets the required standards of the New York Convention. If the court is satisfied, the award can be enforced as if it were a domestic court judgment.
5. Arbitration Institutions in Comoros
As of now, Comoros does not have a well-established local arbitration institution. However, arbitration can be administered through international institutions, including:
OHADA Arbitration Centers:
Since Comoros is a member of OHADA, disputes may be referred to the OHADA Common Court of Justice and Arbitration (CCJA), which handles cases involving member states.
International Institutions:
Parties in Comoros may also choose to have their arbitration proceedings administered by international bodies, such as:
- International Chamber of Commerce (ICC).
- London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA).
- International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR).
- Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA).
These institutions offer robust frameworks for arbitration and can provide support for both domestic and international disputes.
6. Advantages of Arbitration in Comoros
International Recognition:
As a signatory to the New York Convention, Comoros offers the international recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, making it an attractive venue for international arbitration.
Neutral Forum:
Arbitration in Comoros can provide a neutral forum for resolving disputes, particularly for parties from other African countries or international parties seeking an alternative to local courts.
Flexibility and Choice of Rules:
Arbitration allows parties to choose from a wide variety of rules, arbitral institutions, and procedural steps, offering flexibility in resolving disputes.
7. Challenges and Considerations
Lack of Local Arbitration Infrastructure:
Comoros does not yet have a strong local arbitration infrastructure, and parties may need to rely on international arbitration institutions for the administration of proceedings.
Awareness and Development:
The legal system for arbitration in Comoros is still in its early stages, and awareness of arbitration procedures may be limited compared to more developed jurisdictions. Efforts to improve the legal framework and promote arbitration as a means of dispute resolution are ongoing.
Cost of Arbitration:
The cost of arbitration, particularly international arbitration, may be a concern, especially for smaller businesses or parties unfamiliar with the process.
Conclusion
While Comoros lacks a robust, domestic arbitration framework, the country has taken steps to integrate arbitration into its legal system by adhering to international treaties such as the New York Convention and the OHADA framework. Arbitration can be an effective means of resolving disputes in Comoros, especially for international parties seeking to avoid local court proceedings.
RELATED Blog
0 comments