What is Kompetenz-Kompetenz Principle?
Kompetenz-Kompetenz Principle
Meaning
The Kompetenz-Kompetenz (also spelled Kompetenzkompetenz) principle is a fundamental doctrine in arbitration law that means:
"Competence to decide on competence."
In simpler terms:
The arbitral tribunal itself has the power to rule on its own jurisdiction, including any objections about whether the tribunal has the authority to hear a dispute.
The tribunal can decide whether the arbitration agreement is valid and applicable before any court does.
Origin
The principle originates from German arbitration law, where “Kompetenz” means “competence” or “jurisdiction.”
It has been widely adopted internationally and is recognized in many arbitration laws and conventions, including the UNCITRAL Model Law and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (India).
Legal Position in India
The principle is enshrined in Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Section 16(1) says the arbitral tribunal can decide on its jurisdiction, including objections about the existence or validity of the arbitration agreement.
Why is it Important?
It prevents unnecessary delays by allowing the arbitral tribunal to handle jurisdictional challenges upfront.
Avoids parties going back and forth between courts and arbitrators.
Promotes the principle of party autonomy in arbitration.
How Does It Work?
Party raises jurisdictional objection (e.g., no valid arbitration agreement).
Tribunal considers and decides on the objection.
If the tribunal rules it has jurisdiction, it proceeds to hear the case.
If a party disagrees with the tribunal’s jurisdiction decision, they may approach the court, but only after the tribunal has ruled (except in some exceptional cases).
Example / Case Law
Case: Catherine Mary Rowland v. N.K. Sharma (AIR 1963 Cal 205)
The court recognized the tribunal's power to decide its own jurisdiction first.
Emphasized that courts should generally defer jurisdictional questions to the arbitral tribunal initially.
Case: Bharat Aluminium Co. v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Service, Inc., (BALCO), (2012) 9 SCC 552*
The Supreme Court held that the tribunal has the primary right to decide on its jurisdiction.
Courts should intervene only after the tribunal has made its ruling on jurisdiction.
Summary Table
| Aspect | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Meaning | Tribunal decides on its own jurisdiction |
| Purpose | Prevent delays, promote party autonomy |
| Legal Basis | Section 16, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 |
| Effect | Tribunal’s jurisdictional rulings take precedence initially |
| Court Role | Courts intervene after tribunal's ruling |
RELATED Blog
0 comments