Arbitration Law in Mexico
Arbitration Law in Mexico
Mexico is considered one of the key jurisdictions for arbitration in Latin America. The country has modernized its legal framework to align with international standards, especially in the field of commercial and investment arbitration. Arbitration in Mexico is governed by a mix of domestic laws, international conventions, and institutional rules, making it an attractive destination for dispute resolution, both for domestic and international parties.
1. Legal Framework
The primary legal provisions for arbitration in Mexico are found in the Code of Commerce (Código de Comercio) and the International Treaties Mexico is a party to, including the New York Convention.
Code of Commerce (Código de Comercio): Arbitration in Mexico is primarily governed by the Commercial Code, which was updated in 1993 to include provisions related to arbitration. The relevant sections of the Code of Commerce are found in Title Twelve (Articles 1415 to 1441), which specifically govern arbitration agreements, procedures, and enforcement of arbitral awards.
New York Convention: Mexico is a signatory to the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. This ensures that Mexico recognizes and enforces arbitral awards made in other signatory countries, facilitating the enforcement of international arbitration awards.
ICSID Convention: Mexico is also a party to the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) Convention, making it a jurisdiction for resolving investment disputes between foreign investors and the state.
2. Arbitration Agreement
Form of Agreement: Arbitration agreements in Mexico must be in writing, and this includes agreements that arise in contracts or separate arbitration clauses. Under the Code of Commerce, an arbitration agreement is binding and enforceable if agreed by the parties.
Scope of Arbitration Agreement: The arbitration agreement must specify the scope of disputes subject to arbitration. Mexican law generally respects the autonomy of the parties to define the issues to be arbitrated.
Mandatory Arbitration: Mexican law recognizes the validity of arbitration agreements even when one party seeks to avoid arbitration. Courts may intervene to compel arbitration if one party refuses to arbitrate.
3. Types of Arbitration
Mexico recognizes both domestic and international arbitration, with distinct procedures in place for each:
Domestic Arbitration: Arbitration between Mexican parties, typically governed by the Code of Commerce. The procedures follow the rules set out in the Mexican commercial arbitration laws, and the seat of the arbitration is in Mexico.
International Arbitration: Mexico is a favorable jurisdiction for international arbitration due to its adherence to the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law. In international cases, the parties often choose an arbitration institution like the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) or the Mexican Arbitration Center (CAM), but they can also decide to follow the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules or any other set of rules.
4. Appointment of Arbitrators
Selection by Parties: In Mexico, the parties to the arbitration are generally free to appoint the arbitrators. Arbitration can be conducted by a sole arbitrator or a panel of three arbitrators, depending on the agreement between the parties.
Court Appointment: If the parties cannot agree on the appointment of arbitrators, the Mexican courts may intervene to make the appointment, although this is done only as a last resort. Additionally, the Mexican Arbitration Center (CAM) can assist in appointing arbitrators if the parties request it.
Impartiality and Independence: Mexican law requires that arbitrators be impartial and independent, with disclosure requirements to ensure there are no conflicts of interest.
5. Arbitration Procedure
The arbitration procedure in Mexico follows the Code of Commerce as well as any institutional rules agreed upon by the parties. Key procedural aspects include:
Flexibility in Procedure: The parties have a high degree of flexibility in determining the procedural rules. Arbitration can follow the rules of a recognized institution, such as the ICC or CAM, or the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. If the parties do not agree on the procedure, the arbitral tribunal will establish the rules.
Language: The parties are free to choose the language in which the arbitration will be conducted. The most common language for international arbitrations is English or Spanish.
Seat of Arbitration: The seat of arbitration is critical as it determines the jurisdictional rules that apply to the arbitration. While the parties are free to choose the seat, Mexico’s legal framework allows the seat to be either within Mexico or elsewhere. This also dictates the role of Mexican courts in supporting the arbitration process.
6. Role of Courts
Mexican courts have a limited role in arbitration, consistent with international standards that promote arbitration as a private method of dispute resolution. Courts can intervene in the following situations:
Appointment of Arbitrators: If the parties cannot agree on the appointment of arbitrators, the court can intervene to make the appointment.
Interim Measures: While arbitrators have the authority to issue interim measures, parties may also request pre-arbitral interim measures from Mexican courts if needed, especially to prevent harm before arbitration is commenced.
Judicial Assistance: Courts can assist with procedural matters, such as compelling witnesses or the production of documents, if requested by the arbitrators.
Challenges to Arbitrators: If a party believes that an arbitrator is biased or not impartial, it can request the court to intervene and replace the arbitrator.
Enforcement of Awards: Under the New York Convention, arbitral awards, both domestic and foreign, are enforceable in Mexico. If a party refuses to comply with an arbitral award, the other party can seek enforcement through the courts.
7. Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
Domestic Awards: An award made in Mexico is recognized as a judgment and can be enforced through the Mexican courts. The Code of Commerce allows for the enforcement of domestic arbitral awards without the need for court intervention, unless there is a challenge to the award.
Foreign Awards: Since Mexico is a signatory to the New York Convention, foreign arbitral awards are automatically recognized and enforceable in Mexico, subject to certain exceptions. For example, the award cannot violate public policy, and the parties must have been given a fair opportunity to present their case.
Exceptions to Enforcement: A foreign arbitral award may be refused recognition and enforcement in Mexico if:
- The award was made in a country that is not a signatory to the New York Convention.
- The award is contrary to Mexican public policy.
- The award was made in a manner that violates principles of natural justice.
8. Advantages of Arbitration in Mexico
Modern Legal Framework: Mexico has a modern arbitration law that aligns with international standards, providing a stable and predictable environment for arbitration.
International Recognition: As a signatory to the New York Convention, Mexico ensures that arbitral awards are easily recognized and enforced both domestically and internationally.
Investment Dispute Resolution: Mexico’s adherence to the ICSID Convention makes it a favorable jurisdiction for resolving investment disputes.
Arbitration Institutions: Mexico has established arbitration institutions, such as the Mexican Arbitration Center (CAM), which provide support and resources for arbitration proceedings.
Pro-Arbitration Stance: The Mexican legal system strongly favors arbitration as a method of dispute resolution, with limited judicial intervention, ensuring greater autonomy for parties.
9. Challenges and Opportunities
Challenges
Limited Local Expertise: While Mexico is making progress in fostering local arbitration expertise, there is still a need to increase the availability of trained arbitrators and arbitration professionals.
Competition from Other Jurisdictions: While Mexico is a strong arbitration hub in Latin America, it faces competition from other arbitration-friendly jurisdictions like Panama and Brazil.
Opportunities
Regional Arbitration Hub: Mexico has the opportunity to position itself as a leading arbitration hub in Latin America, particularly by leveraging its trade relations with the United States, Canada, and other countries in the Pacific Alliance.
Investment Arbitration: With the increasing number of investment treaties Mexico has signed, there are more opportunities for the country to handle investment arbitration disputes, particularly under the ICSID framework.
10. Conclusion
Mexico has developed a robust legal framework for both domestic and international arbitration, making it an attractive destination for arbitration in Latin America. With its alignment with international standards, including the New York Convention and ICSID Convention, Mexico has earned a reputation as a pro-arbitration jurisdiction. However, there is still room for growth in terms of local expertise, which presents both challenges and opportunities. The country’s favorable arbitration laws, strong legal infrastructure, and institutional support ensure that it will continue to be an important player in the global arbitration landscape.
RELATED Blog
0 comments