Origin and development of administrative law
Origin and Development of Administrative Law
1. Introduction to Administrative Law
Administrative law is the branch of law that governs the activities of administrative agencies of government. It ensures that these agencies act within their authority and respect legal and constitutional principles, protecting citizens from arbitrary or abusive administration.
2. Origin of Administrative Law
Historical Background
Early English Law: The origin traces back to English common law and the writ system, especially writs of certiorari, mandamus, prohibition, and habeas corpus. These writs provided mechanisms to challenge unlawful government actions.
Separation of Powers: Initially, the focus was on maintaining the separation between judiciary and executive, with courts exercising control over executive actions that exceeded jurisdiction.
Emergence of the Welfare State: In the 19th and 20th centuries, with the rise of complex government functions (e.g., social welfare, economic regulation), the need for specialized agencies increased.
Administrative Agencies and Delegated Legislation: Legislatures began delegating powers to executive agencies to make detailed rules and decisions, creating the administrative state.
3. Development of Administrative Law
Key Phases:
A) Common Law Control
Courts limited executive power through procedural rules and remedies.
Early principles of natural justice (fair hearing, rule against bias) were established.
The writ system developed to control administrative excess.
B) Legislative Expansion
Modern legislatures enacted statutes to create administrative bodies with wide powers.
These laws often delegated law-making authority, requiring new controls and oversight mechanisms.
C) Judicial Review
Courts developed judicial review to assess legality, reasonableness, and fairness of administrative actions.
Expanded protections for individual rights.
Developed grounds of review: illegality, irrationality, procedural impropriety.
D) Codification and Procedural Reforms
Administrative Procedure Acts in some jurisdictions formalized the procedures agencies must follow.
Emergence of administrative tribunals to handle specialized disputes.
4. Landmark Cases Illustrating Development
1. Case of Proclamations (1611) (England)
Facts: King James I issued proclamations to prohibit various trades without parliamentary approval.
Holding: The Court held the King had no power to create new offenses or laws without Parliament.
Significance:
Early assertion of rule of law and limits on executive power.
Foundation of the principle that executive power is limited by law.
2. R. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union (1995) (UK)
Facts: The government promised a compensation scheme but replaced it with a less favorable one without parliamentary approval.
Holding: The House of Lords held the government acted unlawfully, violating statutory duty.
Significance:
Asserted that administrative authorities must follow statutory mandates.
Reinforced judicial review to check executive discretion.
3. A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India (1969) (India)
Facts: Appointment of members to a tribunal without hearing objections.
Holding: The Supreme Court ruled that natural justice applies to administrative bodies.
Significance:
Marked the development of procedural fairness in administrative decisions.
Expanded judicial control over administrative action.
4. Council of Civil Service Unions v. Minister for the Civil Service (1985) (UK) (GCHQ Case)
Facts: Government banned union membership of GCHQ employees for national security reasons.
Holding: The Court held that executive decisions are subject to judicial review except in matters of national security.
Significance:
Developed the three grounds of judicial review: illegality, irrationality, procedural impropriety.
Recognized limits to review on sensitive matters.
5. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) (India)
Facts: Passport was impounded without proper procedure.
Holding: The Court expanded the scope of Article 21, emphasizing due process and fairness in administrative actions.
Significance:
Strengthened protection of fundamental rights against administrative arbitrariness.
Emphasized reasonableness and fairness in administrative law.
5. Summary Table of Cases and Contributions
| Case | Contribution to Administrative Law |
|---|---|
| Case of Proclamations (1611) | Early assertion of limits on executive power; rule of law |
| R. v. Fire Brigades Union (1995) | Executive must follow statutory duties; judicial enforcement |
| A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India (1969) | Natural justice applies to administrative bodies |
| Council of Civil Service Unions (GCHQ Case, 1985) | Grounds for judicial review; limits on national security review |
| Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) | Due process and fairness; expanded fundamental rights protection |
6. Conclusion
Administrative law originated from the need to control arbitrary executive power, with roots in English common law and writs.
Its development accelerated with the rise of the welfare state, delegated legislation, and expanded government functions.
Judicial review and principles like natural justice became central to ensuring accountability.
Case law from various jurisdictions has shaped its evolution, balancing governmental power and individual rights.
RELATED Blog
0 comments