Tort law at Lesotho
Tort law in Lesotho is primarily governed by the Roman-Dutch common law, as modified by local legislation and judicial decisions. The legal system operates independently, drawing from both civil and common law traditions, and decisions from South African courts serve as persuasive authority rather than binding precedent .
⚖️ Legal Framework
Lesotho's tort law is rooted in the Roman-Dutch common law, which emphasizes fault-based liability. Key elements of a delictual claim include:
Wrongfulness: The conduct must be unlawful, infringing upon a legally protected right.
Fault: The defendant must be at fault, either intentionally (dolus) or negligently (culpa).
Causation: There must be a direct link between the defendant's conduct and the harm suffered.
Damage: Actual harm must have occurred to the claimant.
🧾 Key Principles
Negligence: Negligence is assessed using an objective standard, considering how a reasonable person would have acted under similar circumstances. For instance, in Motselekatsi v Manyooko, the court found the defendant negligent for driving into the plaintiff's lane, resulting in a collision.
Strict Liability: In certain situations, such as hazardous activities or statutory offences, strict liability may apply, holding a party liable regardless of fault.
Vicarious Liability: Employers can be held liable for torts committed by employees within the scope of their employment.
🏥 Specific Areas of Tort Liability
Motor Vehicle Accidents: In cases of road accidents, courts assess negligence based on factors like speed, adherence to traffic rules, and the driver's awareness of road conditions. For example, in Molupe v Lesotho National General Insurance Co. Ltd, the court found the insured driver negligent for failing to anticipate a pedestrian crossing in misty conditions.
Assault and Battery: Acts of physical violence are actionable under tort law, with the victim entitled to compensation for harm suffered. In Matobo v Maluti Star Security (Pty) Ltd, the court held that an assault without legal justification infringes upon the victim's constitutional right to freedom from torture and inhuman treatment.
Defamation: False statements that harm a person's reputation can lead to claims for defamation, provided the claimant can prove the falsity of the statement and the harm caused.
🛡️ Defenses and Limitations
Consent: If the claimant consented to the defendant's conduct, it may serve as a valid defense.
Self-Defense: Use of reasonable force to protect oneself or others can justify otherwise unlawful acts.
Statute of Limitations: Delictual claims must be brought within a certain period, typically three years from the date the claimant became aware of the harm .
🧭 Summary
Lesotho's tort law, grounded in Roman-Dutch common law, provides a framework for addressing civil wrongs through principles of fault-based liability. Recent case law illustrates the application of these principles in various contexts, including motor vehicle accidents, assault, and defamation. Understanding these legal foundations is crucial for navigating tort claims in Lesotho.
RELATED Blog
0 comments