Difference Between Criminal and Civil Negligence
Difference Between Criminal and Civil Negligence
Negligence arises when a person fails to exercise reasonable care, leading to harm or damage. But negligence can be criminal or civil, depending on the context, the nature of the duty breached, and the consequences.
1. Civil Negligence
Definition:
Civil negligence occurs when a person fails to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm or loss to another person, and the injured party can sue for compensation.
Key Features:
| Feature | Civil Negligence |
|---|---|
| Purpose | To compensate the victim for loss or damage |
| Legal Action | Filed by the victim (private individual) |
| Burden of Proof | Preponderance of evidence (balance of probabilities) |
| Penalty/Remedy | Compensation (damages) |
| Example | A driver hits a pedestrian due to careless driving. Pedestrian sues for medical expenses. |
Case Law:
Donoghue v. Stevenson (1932) AC 562
A consumer fell ill after drinking ginger beer containing a snail.
The manufacturer owed a duty of care to the consumer.
Held: Negligence in civil law can lead to compensation if a duty of care is breached.
2. Criminal Negligence
Definition:
Criminal negligence occurs when a person’s careless act or omission is so reckless that it amounts to a crime, endangering life or property, even if there was no intention to harm.
Key Features:
| Feature | Criminal Negligence |
|---|---|
| Purpose | To punish the offender and deter careless behavior |
| Legal Action | Initiated by the state/prosecution |
| Burden of Proof | Beyond reasonable doubt |
| Penalty/Remedy | Punishment (imprisonment, fine, or both) |
| Example | A driver drives recklessly and kills someone. The state can prosecute for culpable homicide not amounting to murder. |
Case Law:
R v. Adomako (1995) 1 AC 171 (UK case)
An anesthetist failed to notice a disconnected oxygen tube, resulting in the patient’s death.
Held: The conduct was grossly negligent and criminally liable.
Principle: Gross negligence leading to death can constitute manslaughter.
Indian Case: K. M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra (1962)
While this is more about culpable homicide, Indian courts recognize that gross negligence causing death can attract criminal liability under IPC Section 304A.
3. Major Differences Between Civil and Criminal Negligence
| Basis | Civil Negligence | Criminal Negligence |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Compensation to victim | Punishment/deterrence |
| Who sues? | Private individual (victim) | State/Government |
| Standard of Proof | Preponderance of evidence | Beyond reasonable doubt |
| Outcome | Monetary damages | Fine, imprisonment, or both |
| Example | Car accident causing injury | Reckless driving causing death |
4. Summary
Civil negligence → damages (money) for carelessness.
Criminal negligence → punishment for gross carelessness endangering life or property.
Key test:
Civil → Did the person fail in a duty of care?
Criminal → Was the negligence so gross that it amounts to a crime?
RELATED Blog
0 comments