Concept of Absolute Liability
Concept of Absolute Liability
1. Introduction
Absolute liability is a stringent form of legal liability that holds a party responsible for harm caused by their actions regardless of fault or intent and without any exceptions. Unlike strict liability, where certain defenses (like “act of God” or third-party interference) may be available, absolute liability admits no exceptions or defenses once the act causing harm is established.
2. Origin and Development
a. Strict Liability vs. Absolute Liability
Strict Liability: Originates from the English case Rylands v. Fletcher (1868), where a person who brings something hazardous onto their land is liable for damage caused if it escapes, even if there was no negligence.
However, strict liability allows some defenses, including:
Act of God/nature,
Plaintiff’s own fault,
Statutory authority,
Third party intervention.
Absolute Liability: A higher and more uncompromising standard of liability developed by Indian courts to deal with hazardous industries affecting public safety and environment.
3. Concept in Indian Jurisprudence
The concept of Absolute Liability was first evolved by the Supreme Court of India in the landmark case:
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (Oleum Gas Leak Case), 1987
Facts: A leak of Oleum gas from a factory in Delhi caused harm to the public.
Issue: The Court had to determine the liability of the enterprise engaged in hazardous activity.
Judgment and Principle Established:
The Court held that industries engaged in hazardous or inherently dangerous activities owe an absolute and non-delegable duty to ensure no harm results to anyone.
If harm occurs, they are absolutely liable, meaning:
No exceptions are allowed.
The enterprise cannot claim any defense (negligence, no fault, act of God, third party, etc.).
This is a stricter standard than strict liability, created to protect the environment and public from industrial hazards.
4. Characteristics of Absolute Liability
No Exceptions Allowed: No defense of mistake, accident, or third party intervention can be accepted.
Applies to Hazardous Industries: Typically applies to industries dealing with dangerous substances or processes.
Higher Standard than Strict Liability: More stringent and uncompromising.
Non-Delegable Duty: The enterprise cannot transfer or delegate responsibility.
Compensation Must be Paid: Strictly liable to compensate victims irrespective of fault.
5. Important Case Laws
1. M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (Oleum Gas Leak Case), 1987
Established the principle of absolute liability for hazardous industries.
Highlighted the state’s duty to protect citizens and environment.
2. Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India, 1996
Facts: The case involved hazardous waste pollution in Bichhri village caused by chemical industries.
Court reiterated the principle of absolute liability and ordered compensation to affected villagers.
Emphasized that polluting industries must pay for environmental damage without exceptions.
3. Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India, 1996
The Court reaffirmed the principle of absolute liability as a facet of the Precautionary Principle and Polluter Pays Principle.
Industries engaging in hazardous activities must bear the cost of preventing and remedying pollution.
6. Difference Between Strict Liability and Absolute Liability
| Aspect | Strict Liability | Absolute Liability |
|---|---|---|
| Origin | Rylands v. Fletcher (English law) | Indian Supreme Court (M.C. Mehta case) |
| Defenses Available | Yes (Act of God, Plaintiff’s fault) | No defenses allowed |
| Applicability | General tortious acts | Hazardous and inherently dangerous industries |
| Nature of Duty | May be delegated | Non-delegable |
| Objective | Protect property and people | Protect public and environment |
| Compensation | Pay if liable | Must pay irrespective of fault |
7. Significance
The doctrine of absolute liability reflects the balance between industrial growth and environmental protection.
It places the onus on industries dealing with dangerous substances to prevent harm.
It strengthens the environmental jurisprudence in India.
Acts as a deterrent against negligence in hazardous industries.
Supports the right to life under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution by ensuring safe environment.
8. Conclusion
The concept of absolute liability in India sets a high standard of accountability for enterprises engaged in hazardous activities. It reflects the judiciary's proactive role in protecting citizens and the environment from industrial risks by imposing an unconditional obligation to compensate victims for any harm caused. This doctrine has no parallel in common law and underscores India’s unique approach to environmental and public safety concerns.
RELATED Blog
0 comments