The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Whistleblowers' Legal Rights under Employment Law
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Whistleblowers' Legal Rights under Employment Law
1. Overview of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX)
Enacted in 2002 in response to corporate scandals like Enron and WorldCom.
Aimed at improving corporate governance, financial disclosures, and preventing accounting fraud.
Section 806 (codified at 18 U.S.C. § 1514A) specifically protects employees of publicly traded companies from retaliation if they report fraudulent activity or violations of SEC rules.
2. Whistleblower Protections Under SOX
Who is Protected?
Employees of publicly traded companies and their subsidiaries.
Contractors, subcontractors, and agents of these companies.
What is Protected Activity?
Reporting or assisting in investigations regarding violations of securities laws, fraud against shareholders, or any federal laws related to fraud against shareholders.
Internal or external reports to supervisors, compliance officers, auditors, the SEC, or law enforcement.
Prohibited Employer Actions (Retaliation Includes):
Firing, demotion, suspension.
Threats, harassment, or any adverse employment action tied to whistleblowing.
Enforcement Mechanism:
Employees can file complaints with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) within 180 days of retaliation.
If OSHA doesn’t resolve the complaint, employees can bring a lawsuit in federal court.
Remedies include reinstatement, back pay, compensatory damages, and attorney’s fees.
3. Legal Standards and Burden of Proof
The employee must show that their whistleblowing activity was a contributing factor in the adverse employment action.
The employer must then prove by clear and convincing evidence that it would have taken the same action regardless of the whistleblowing.
4. Key Case Law on SOX Whistleblower Protections
Case 1: Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White, 548 U.S. 53 (2006) (Although not SOX, influential on retaliation law)
Held that retaliation is not limited to actions affecting the terms and conditions of employment; even actions that are materially adverse enough to dissuade a reasonable employee from complaining are prohibited.
This case is used as a standard to interpret retaliation broadly, including SOX claims.
Case 2: Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers, 138 S.Ct. 767 (2018)
Issue: Whether SOX whistleblower protections extend to employees who report wrongdoing internally but not to the SEC.
Holding: The Supreme Court ruled that SOX protection applies only to employees who report to the SEC or participate in an SEC investigation, not just internal company reporting.
Importance: This narrowed the scope of SOX whistleblower protection, emphasizing the necessity of reporting to the SEC to claim protection.
Case 3: Allen v. Admin. Review Bd., U.S. Dep’t of Labor, 514 F.3d 468 (5th Cir. 2008)
Issue: Employer retaliated against employee who reported fraudulent accounting practices.
Holding: The court upheld SOX’s whistleblower protections and awarded reinstatement and back pay to the employee.
Significance: Demonstrates that courts take retaliation claims seriously and enforce remedies under SOX.
Case 4: Rosenbach v. Six Flags Entertainment Corp., 129 N.E.3d 1197 (Ill. 2019) (Note: State case but illustrative of retaliation principles)
Holding: Retaliation claims don’t require proof of economic harm; a chilling effect on the employee’s rights is sufficient.
This reflects the evolving judicial approach to whistleblower protection, which SOX embodies federally.
5. Practical Implications for Employers and Employees
For Employees:
Must understand their rights to report wrongdoing internally or externally (to the SEC).
Should document all communications and adverse actions.
Need to file complaints timely (within 180 days) to preserve claims.
For Employers:
Must create and maintain compliance programs that encourage reporting.
Must ensure no retaliation occurs — training and prompt investigation are key.
Risk significant penalties, including reinstatement and damages, if retaliation is proven.
6. Summary Table
| Aspect | Description |
|---|---|
| Law | Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2002), Section 806 (18 U.S.C. §1514A) |
| Protected Employees | Employees, contractors of publicly traded companies |
| Protected Activity | Reporting securities fraud, violations to SEC or law enforcement |
| Prohibited Actions | Retaliation: firing, demotion, suspension, harassment |
| Enforcement | File with OSHA within 180 days, then federal court lawsuit |
| Burden of Proof | Employee: whistleblowing contributed to adverse action |
| Employer: clear and convincing proof of same action regardless | |
| Key Case | Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers (2018) - narrowed scope |
Conclusion
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act provides important protections for whistleblowers in publicly traded companies by prohibiting retaliation for reporting fraud or violations of securities laws. However, legal developments such as the Digital Realty decision have clarified that reporting to the SEC is a critical element for protection under SOX. Both employees and employers must understand these rules to navigate whistleblowing effectively within employment law.
RELATED Blog
0 comments