Alternate Dispute Resolution Law at Sudan
Sudan has established a multifaceted framework for Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), incorporating both formal legal mechanisms and traditional practices. This approach aims to provide efficient, culturally appropriate, and accessible methods for resolving disputes across the country.
⚖️ Legal Framework for ADR in Sudan
1. Arbitration Act No. 25 of 2016
The Arbitration Act serves as the cornerstone for ADR in Sudan, governing both domestic and international arbitration. Key features include:
Scope and Arbitrability: Arbitration is permissible for civil transactions, excluding matters that cannot be subject to conciliation (sulh), such as personal status issues under Islamic law. Employment disputes between individual employees and employers are also generally excluded from arbitration, though collective labor disputes may be arbitrated.
Arbitration Agreements: Must be in writing to be valid. The Supreme Court has emphasized that arbitration agreements should be clear and unambiguous
Enforcement of Awards: Sudan is a signatory to the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, facilitating the enforcement of international arbitration awards. However, enforcement may be refused on grounds of public policy.luding to the Court of Appeal, Supreme Court, and potentially the Constitutional Court, which can delay the finality of arbitration awards. This has been a point of criticism, as it may undermine the efficiency of arbitration
2. Consumer Dispute Resolution
Mediation is a prevalent ADR mechanism for consumer disputes in Sudan. It offers a cost-effective and flexible alternative to litigation, allowing parties to reach mutually satisfactory agreements. Arbitration is also utilized, providing a more formal process with binding decisions. Both methods are valued for their efficiency and ability to preserve business relationships.
In rural areas, traditional systems of governance, known as native administration, play a significant role in dispute resolution. These systems are based on local customs and are particularly effective in managing disputes among nomadic or semi-nomadic communities. Traditional leaders, such as sheikhs and omdas, adjudicate disputes, fostering community harmony and preserving cultural heritage.
🧑⚖️ ADR Institutions and Initiatives
Sudanese Arbitration Association (SAA): An organization that promotes the development and practice of arbitration in Sudan, aiming to enhance the country's ADR landscape.
Commercial Mediation Centre of Sudan (CMCS): Established to facilitate the mediation of commercial disputes, providing a platform for businesses to resolve conflicts efficiently.
Judicial and Legal Reform Efforts: The transitional government has introduced several legislative reforms, including the Encouragement of Investment Act 2021 and the Public-Private Partnerships Act 2021, which aim to improve the legal environment for dispute resolution and attract foreign investment.
✅ Summary
Sudan's ADR framework is characterized by:
Comprehensive Legislation: The Arbitration Act provides a legal basis for both domestic and international arbitration, while other laws support mediation and traditional dispute resolution.
Institutional Support: Organizations like the SAA and CMCS facilitate ADR processes and promote best practices.
Cultural Integration: Traditional dispute resolution mechanisms remain vital in rural communities, reflecting Sudan's commitment to culturally appropriate justice.
This multifaceted approach ensures that Sudan's ADR system is accessible, adaptable, and aligned with both international standards and local customs.
RELATED Blog
0 comments