Alternate Dispute Resolution Law at Bhutan
Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) in Bhutan is an important and evolving aspect of the country's legal system. Bhutan's legal framework encourages the use of ADR mechanisms such as mediation, arbitration, and negotiation as alternatives to traditional court proceedings. This approach helps to reduce the backlog in courts, offers a quicker resolution to disputes, and promotes peace and harmony in society.
Key Aspects of ADR in Bhutan:
Legal Framework for ADR:
Bhutan's legal system, based on both Buddhist principles and modern statutory law, has evolved to include ADR mechanisms as part of the dispute resolution process.
The Civil and Criminal Procedure Code of Bhutan (CCPC), particularly in its revised versions, recognizes and encourages ADR as a means to resolve disputes outside the courtroom.
Mediation is frequently utilized, particularly in family law and civil matters. The Bhutanese legal system has integrated both traditional and contemporary methods of dispute resolution, incorporating local customs into formal processes.
Mediation:
Mediation is one of the most commonly used ADR processes in Bhutan. It is highly regarded, especially in family disputes and matters involving personal relationships.
The Bhutan National Mediation Centre plays a significant role in providing mediation services. This center is tasked with assisting parties in resolving disputes amicably and avoiding court proceedings.
Mediation is seen as effective because it promotes consensus-building and ensures that both parties have an active role in shaping the resolution of their disputes.
Arbitration:
Arbitration in Bhutan is less formalized than in many other jurisdictions, but it is increasingly gaining recognition, particularly for resolving commercial disputes.
Bhutan's laws are based on the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration to some extent, which facilitates the use of arbitration in international commercial disputes.
The Bhutan Chamber of Commerce and Industry (BCCI) has supported the use of arbitration, particularly in disputes between businesses. The goal is to create an efficient, neutral, and legally sound process for resolving disputes outside of the courts.
Traditional Dispute Resolution:
Bhutan has a rich tradition of informal community-based dispute resolution, often involving local elders, monks, or community leaders who act as mediators or arbitrators in disputes. This traditional form of ADR is particularly common in rural areas and is highly respected.
The Lhakhang (temple-based) mediation system is another traditional method in which monks and spiritual leaders resolve disputes by drawing upon religious principles and community norms.
Court-Annexed Mediation:
Bhutan has explored court-annexed mediation as part of its broader judicial reforms. This allows disputes to be directed to a mediator as part of the court process before proceeding to a full trial.
The Bhutan Judiciary supports the use of mediation, and there are initiatives to train judges, lawyers, and other legal professionals in mediation techniques. This is aimed at improving the overall efficiency and accessibility of the justice system.
Advantages of ADR in Bhutan:
Efficiency: ADR is often faster than traditional litigation, especially given the backlog in Bhutan’s courts.
Cost-Effectiveness: ADR mechanisms like mediation and arbitration can be less expensive than prolonged court battles, making them more accessible to individuals and businesses.
Confidentiality: ADR provides a more private resolution, which can be important in sensitive disputes, such as those involving family matters or business secrets.
Flexibility: ADR allows for more flexible solutions that are tailored to the needs of the parties involved, rather than being strictly bound by legal precedents.
Challenges of ADR in Bhutan:
Awareness and Education: While ADR is encouraged, there is still a need to increase awareness among the public about its benefits and availability.
Cultural Barriers: Traditional methods of dispute resolution can sometimes be in conflict with more formal ADR mechanisms, especially in urbanized areas where people may be more accustomed to formal litigation.
Training and Expertise: There is a need for more trained mediators and arbitrators, as well as resources to support them.
Role of the Judiciary and Government:
The Royal Court of Justice (Bhutan’s judiciary) actively supports ADR mechanisms and has incorporated them into the country's judicial reform agenda.
The Bhutan Legal Institute plays a role in educating legal professionals about ADR practices, including training judges in mediation and arbitration skills.
Government initiatives aim to promote ADR by making legal processes more accessible and efficient, which includes establishing ADR programs in local communities.
Conclusion:
In Bhutan, ADR plays a vital role in the legal system by offering accessible, cost-effective, and peaceful alternatives to litigation. With mediation, arbitration, and traditional forms of dispute resolution gaining prominence, the country is building a more efficient and harmonious approach to handling disputes. As awareness grows and infrastructure develops, ADR is expected to play an even larger role in Bhutan's legal framework, particularly in commercial disputes, family law, and community-based matters. The balance of traditional dispute resolution methods with modern ADR practices provides a unique and culturally rich model of justice.
RELATED Blog
0 comments