Alternate Dispute Resolution Law at Guinea-Bissau
Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) Law in Guinea-Bissau refers to the various legal methods and frameworks that allow individuals and entities to resolve disputes outside of the formal court system. Although Guinea-Bissau's ADR legal framework is not as developed as in some other nations, it includes mechanisms such as arbitration, mediation, and conciliation, influenced by both its colonial history and the evolving international legal standards.
Here’s an overview of the ADR landscape in Guinea-Bissau:
1. Legal Framework for ADR in Guinea-Bissau
Guinea-Bissau’s legal system is primarily based on civil law principles, and ADR mechanisms have been gradually integrated into the legal system.
a. Arbitration Law
Guinea-Bissau is a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958), which facilitates the enforcement of international arbitration awards.
Arbitration in Guinea-Bissau is primarily used for commercial and trade disputes, but there is no comprehensive, specialized Arbitration Act in place yet. Arbitration follows general legal principles that allow parties to resolve disputes by appointing arbitrators.
b. Mediation and Conciliation
Mediation and conciliation are recognized in both civil and commercial disputes, though there is no established formal process.
The legal system encourages informal mediation through community leaders, especially in rural areas, where traditional customs and community-based dispute resolution are highly valued.
2. ADR Methods in Practice
a. Arbitration
Arbitration is used primarily in the commercial sector. Although it is not explicitly regulated by an updated national arbitration law, it is recognized in commercial contracts and agreements.
Arbitration can be domestic or international. Guinea-Bissau's recognition of international treaties allows foreign arbitral awards to be enforced in local courts.
b. Mediation
Court-directed mediation is not a widespread practice, but it is occasionally used in family and civil disputes, with judges often recommending settlement through mutual consent.
Community mediation based on traditional practices also plays a key role in resolving local disputes, especially in rural areas.
While mediation remains informal, it is increasingly seen as a way to address cases more quickly and without overburdening the court system.
c. Conciliation
Conciliation is commonly used in labor disputes, with both parties encouraged to reach a settlement before pursuing formal legal action.
The Ministry of Labor may intervene in some disputes, particularly in employment issues, seeking to resolve issues through conciliation rather than litigation.
3. Customary Law and ADR
Guinea-Bissau places a significant cultural emphasis on customary law as a form of ADR. Traditional leaders, such as village chiefs or community elders, play a central role in dispute resolution, particularly for land, family, and community disputes.
Customary law is widely respected and has a direct influence on resolving disputes, especially in rural or indigenous communities. These customary systems offer informal and culturally relevant means of dispute resolution.
4. ADR Institutional Support
Judiciary of Guinea-Bissau: While there is no official, fully established ADR framework, courts in Guinea-Bissau often encourage settlement before formal litigation.
Ministry of Justice: Provides some guidance and support for the use of ADR, especially in regard to mediation and conciliation in family and civil matters.
Traditional Dispute Resolution: Customary leaders and community elders are important institutions that guide the resolution of local disputes, particularly those that don’t involve formal legal issues.
5. International Influence
Guinea-Bissau’s legal system has been influenced by international ADR standards, especially those pertaining to arbitration and the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. However, further modernization and formalization of the ADR processes are needed to align with international best practices.
6. Benefits and Challenges
Benefits:
Cost-effective and faster than the formal litigation process.
Can preserve relationships, especially in community and family disputes.
Customary law provides culturally relevant solutions for many disputes.
Challenges:
Limited formalized ADR infrastructure (lack of dedicated ADR legislation).
Limited awareness and training regarding formal mediation and arbitration procedures.
Enforcement of ADR outcomes can be challenging, especially with customary decisions.
Conclusion
In Guinea-Bissau, ADR is still in its developmental stages but is widely influenced by customary law and informal community-based practices. Arbitration and mediation, especially in the commercial and labor sectors, are growing in importance. However, the legal infrastructure for ADR is underdeveloped, and there is a need for further formalization and awareness-raising within the legal and business communities.
RELATED Blog
0 comments