Alternate Dispute Resolution Law at Finland
In Finland, Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) is a well-established part of the legal system, offering alternatives to traditional court litigation. Finland’s legal framework encourages the use of ADR methods such as arbitration, mediation, and conciliation to resolve various disputes, including commercial, civil, family, and labor matters. The Finnish legal system is supportive of ADR, as it helps to alleviate the burden on courts, promotes amicable settlement, and provides more efficient and flexible resolution processes.
Here’s an overview of the key aspects of ADR in Finland:
1. Arbitration
Arbitration is a widely recognized method of resolving commercial and civil disputes in Finland. It involves the parties agreeing to submit their dispute to a neutral third party, the arbitrator, whose decision is typically binding.
Legal Framework: The primary legal framework governing arbitration in Finland is the Arbitration Act (967/1992), which is based on the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. The Act covers the procedures for initiating arbitration, the powers of the arbitrators, and the enforcement of arbitral awards.
Arbitral Institutions: Finland has several institutions that offer arbitration services, including the Finnish Arbitration Institute (FAI), which is part of the Chamber of Commerce. The FAI administers both domestic and international arbitrations.
Arbitration Agreements: It is common in commercial contracts for parties to include an arbitration clause specifying that disputes will be resolved through arbitration. The Finnish courts generally respect these agreements and will enforce them.
Enforcement of Arbitration Awards: Finland is a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958), which means that foreign arbitral awards can be enforced in Finland, and Finnish arbitration awards can be enforced in other countries that are parties to the Convention.
2. Mediation
Mediation is another widely used ADR method in Finland, especially for family disputes, civil matters, and some commercial disputes. Mediation is a voluntary, non-binding process where a neutral third party, the mediator, helps the parties reach a mutually agreeable solution.
Legal Framework: The use of mediation in Finland is primarily regulated by the Mediation Act (394/2011), which outlines the role of mediators, confidentiality, and the voluntary nature of the process. This Act applies to disputes in family law, civil law, and other types of cases where the parties voluntarily agree to mediation.
Court-Annexed Mediation: Finnish courts often encourage or refer parties to mediation, especially in family law cases such as divorce and child custody disputes. In some cases, mediation is even mandatory before proceeding to full court hearings.
Confidentiality: Mediation in Finland is confidential, meaning that anything disclosed during the process cannot be used in court if the dispute continues to litigation.
Outcome of Mediation: Mediation is non-binding unless the parties reach an agreement that they choose to formalize in writing. If the parties agree on the terms, the agreement can be made enforceable by the courts.
3. Conciliation
Conciliation is a process in which a neutral third party, the conciliator, plays a more active role in helping the parties settle their dispute by suggesting solutions or resolving points of disagreement. Conciliation is often used in labor disputes and consumer issues.
Conciliation in Labor Disputes: Labor disputes in Finland are often resolved through conciliation, which is a key feature of the Finnish labor market system. The Finnish National Conciliation Board (Valtioneuvoston sovittelija) plays a critical role in resolving disputes between employers and trade unions.
Conciliation in Consumer Disputes: The Consumer Disputes Board (Kuluttajariitalautakunta) also facilitates conciliation between consumers and businesses, particularly for disputes involving goods and services.
Court-Annexed Conciliation: Similar to mediation, conciliation is sometimes used as part of the court procedure, particularly in civil disputes. The conciliator will attempt to help the parties settle the dispute before it proceeds to a full trial.
4. Online Dispute Resolution (ODR)
Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) is gaining popularity in Finland, especially for consumer disputes in the context of e-commerce. The European Union has created an ODR platform for cross-border consumer disputes, and Finland participates in this initiative.
EU ODR Platform: The EU ODR Platform is an online service that allows consumers and businesses in Finland to resolve disputes related to online purchases without the need for litigation. The platform connects users with an online mediator to resolve disputes in a cost-effective and efficient manner.
ODR for Commercial Disputes: While ODR is primarily used for consumer disputes, businesses in Finland may also explore ODR as a way to resolve cross-border disputes, particularly in e-commerce or international trade.
5. Judicial Encouragement of ADR
Finnish courts actively encourage the use of ADR methods, particularly mediation, to settle disputes before they go to trial.
Court-Annexed Mediation and Arbitration: In Finland, courts can refer parties to mediation before proceeding with litigation, especially in family law cases such as divorce or child custody. Similarly, if the parties have agreed to arbitration in their contract, the Finnish courts will enforce that agreement and refer the case to arbitration instead of litigation.
Mandatory Mediation: In some cases, especially in family law disputes, mediation may be mandatory before the court process can proceed. For example, mediation is mandatory in divorce and child custody cases in Finland unless one party objects.
Support for ADR: Finnish judges are generally supportive of ADR and may recommend or require it to help resolve disputes more amicably and efficiently.
6. Advantages of ADR in Finland
Cost-Effectiveness: ADR methods are generally less expensive than going through the court system, which involves high legal fees, long delays, and other associated costs.
Speed: ADR procedures, particularly mediation and conciliation, are typically much faster than traditional court proceedings, allowing disputes to be resolved more quickly.
Confidentiality: ADR processes like mediation and arbitration offer greater confidentiality than public court hearings, which is especially valuable in sensitive commercial and family disputes.
Flexibility: ADR provides more flexibility in terms of the process and the potential outcomes. Parties have more control over the resolution compared to a formal court trial, where the judge has the final say.
Better Relationship Maintenance: ADR methods, particularly mediation and conciliation, focus on communication and collaboration, which can help maintain professional or personal relationships that might be damaged by contentious court litigation.
7. Enforcement of ADR Outcomes
Arbitration Awards: Finland is a signatory to the New York Convention, which means foreign arbitral awards can be enforced in Finland. Similarly, Finnish arbitral awards are enforceable internationally under the Convention.
Mediation Agreements: Mediation outcomes are non-binding unless the parties reach a written agreement that they choose to formalize and make enforceable in court.
Conciliation Agreements: Like mediation, conciliation agreements can be made binding if the parties formalize them in writing and seek court enforcement.
Conclusion
In Finland, ADR plays a vital role in the legal system, offering faster, cost-effective, and flexible alternatives to traditional court proceedings. The key ADR methods—arbitration, mediation, and conciliation—are supported by a robust legal framework, including the Arbitration Act and Mediation Act, which provide structure and procedural guidelines for resolving disputes. Courts encourage ADR, especially in family and civil cases, and mandatory mediation is required in certain instances. Finland's adoption of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) further enhances access to justice, particularly for consumer disputes. The advantages of ADR, such as cost-effectiveness, speed, confidentiality, and flexibility, make it an attractive choice for parties seeking to resolve disputes in a more amicable manner.
RELATED Blog
0 comments