Alternate Dispute Resolution Law at Eritrea
Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) in Eritrea is not as extensively codified or institutionalized as in some other jurisdictions, but it does exist and is primarily based on traditional/customary practices, religious mechanisms, and limited formal recognition within the Eritrean legal system.
Here is a general overview of ADR in Eritrea:
1. Traditional/Customary Dispute Resolution
Eritrea has a rich tradition of resolving disputes through elders' councils, tribal leaders, and community mediators.
These customary systems play a major role, especially in rural areas.
Processes are usually informal and involve mediation or conciliation, aiming at restoring social harmony rather than assigning legal blame.
Decisions often reflect community values, reconciliation, and restorative justice.
2. Religious Dispute Resolution
Eritrea's diverse religious landscape (Christianity and Islam) also supports ADR:
Sharia courts handle family and personal status issues for Muslims.
Church-led councils may mediate disputes within the Christian communities.
3. Formal Legal System and ADR
Eritrea’s Transitional Civil Procedure Code (1991) and other national laws do not have well-developed statutory provisions for ADR, but:
Courts may encourage settlement or refer cases to elders for mediation, especially in civil and family matters.
The legal framework recognizes traditional mechanisms, especially when both parties consent.
4. Challenges
Lack of a formal ADR policy or institutions (like arbitration centers).
No comprehensive arbitration law in the modern commercial sense.
ADR remains community-based and limited in complex disputes (e.g., commercial or international).
Opportunities for Development
As Eritrea seeks to develop its legal and economic systems, there's scope for:
Codifying traditional practices into a formal ADR law.
Establishing arbitration centers for commercial disputes.
Promoting ADR training and legal awareness.
Conclusion
ADR in Eritrea is predominantly customary and informal, deeply rooted in its traditional and religious systems. While the formal legal recognition is limited, the practice of resolving disputes outside the court remains active and culturally significant. Future legal reforms may enhance and formalize ADR mechanisms, especially for commercial and civil matters.
RELATED Blog
0 comments