Alternate Dispute Resolution Law at Myanmar
In Myanmar, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is increasingly being recognized as an important method of resolving disputes outside the traditional court system. The concept of ADR in Myanmar encompasses processes such as arbitration, mediation, conciliation, and negotiation. While formal ADR mechanisms are still developing, significant legal frameworks have been established, and efforts have been made to promote these alternative methods of dispute resolution.
Legal Framework for ADR in Myanmar
Arbitration Law (2016)
The Arbitration Law of 2016 is a key piece of legislation governing arbitration in Myanmar. It was enacted to modernize and regulate arbitration practices in line with international standards, particularly the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. The law applies to both domestic and international arbitration.
Under this law, arbitration is intended to be a more efficient and less formal process compared to court litigation. It provides guidelines for the formation of arbitration agreements, the appointment of arbitrators, the arbitration process, and the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards.
Myanmar is a party to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, which strengthens its commitment to honoring international arbitration awards.
The Myanmar Union Judiciary Law (2010)
While this law primarily focuses on the structure of the judiciary, it recognizes the importance of ADR processes such as mediation and conciliation. This law encourages courts to promote dispute resolution outside the formal judicial system.
The judiciary has been gradually adopting ADR processes in various types of cases, including family law, labor disputes, and civil matters.
The Myanmar Mediation Rules (2016)
The Mediation Rules were issued to govern the mediation process in Myanmar. These rules provide a framework for the mediation of disputes, particularly in the context of court-annexed mediation, and outline the procedures to be followed by parties in a dispute.
The Mediation Rules encourage the use of mediation to resolve disputes in a way that preserves relationships between parties. It allows the disputing parties to find a mutually agreeable solution with the help of a neutral third party.
The Commercial Dispute Resolution Center (CDRC)
The CDRC was established by the Myanmar Government to provide a platform for resolving commercial disputes through ADR processes, including arbitration and mediation. The CDRC is a significant step towards creating a formalized and internationally recognized system for commercial dispute resolution in Myanmar.
The CDRC promotes both domestic and international arbitration and is aligned with global best practices in commercial dispute resolution.
Labour Disputes
In Myanmar, labor disputes are often settled through conciliation and mediation. The Labor Organization Law (2011) and the Labor Dispute Settlement Law (which deals with disputes between employers and employees) provide for dispute resolution mechanisms, including the use of conciliation before disputes are taken to court. These laws encourage the resolution of labor disputes without the need for lengthy litigation.
The Ministry of Labour, Immigration, and Population and the Labour Relations Department play an essential role in facilitating conciliation and mediation in employment-related disputes.
Types of ADR in Myanmar
Arbitration
Arbitration is one of the main ADR methods promoted under the Arbitration Law of 2016. It allows parties to resolve their disputes outside the court system through a neutral arbitrator who makes a binding decision after hearing both sides. Arbitration is particularly popular in commercial disputes, construction contracts, and international trade disputes.
Myanmar's arbitration law is closely aligned with international standards, making it an attractive jurisdiction for international commercial arbitration.
Mediation
Mediation is another key ADR process in Myanmar, with the Mediation Rules (2016) providing a structure for its use. In mediation, a neutral third-party mediator helps facilitate communication between the parties, guiding them toward a mutually acceptable settlement.
Mediation is often court-annexed, meaning that courts can refer cases to mediation before proceeding with formal litigation. It is used in civil disputes, family law matters, and some labor cases.
Conciliation
Conciliation is similar to mediation, but in this process, the conciliator plays a more active role in suggesting possible solutions to the dispute. Conciliation is often used in labor disputes and certain commercial conflicts.
The Labor Dispute Settlement Law encourages the use of conciliation for resolving employment-related disputes before bringing the case to the formal judicial system.
Negotiation
Negotiation is the most informal form of ADR, where the parties to a dispute engage directly with each other (often with legal representatives) to negotiate a resolution. This method is commonly used in business and contractual disputes.
ADR Institutions in Myanmar
The Myanmar Commercial Dispute Resolution Center (CDRC)
The CDRC is a key institution in Myanmar for handling commercial disputes through arbitration and mediation. It aims to provide a transparent, efficient, and reliable method of resolving business-related disputes. The center plays a vital role in the growth of ADR in Myanmar, particularly for international disputes.
Myanmar Mediation Center (MMC)
The Myanmar Mediation Center (MMC) is another key institution promoting mediation as an effective tool for dispute resolution in Myanmar. The MMC works in cooperation with the Myanmar Bar Association and other entities to offer mediation services in both commercial and civil disputes.
Labor Dispute Resolution Bodies
Myanmar has dedicated government bodies to handle labor disputes. These bodies help facilitate the resolution of employment-related conflicts, often through conciliation or mediation. They are part of the Ministry of Labour, Immigration, and Population.
Benefits of ADR in Myanmar
Cost-effective: ADR methods, particularly mediation and arbitration, are generally less expensive than traditional court proceedings.
Time-efficient: ADR processes tend to resolve disputes more quickly than going through the formal court system.
Confidentiality: ADR proceedings are typically private and confidential, which can be especially important in commercial or family-related disputes.
Flexibility: ADR offers more flexibility in terms of procedures, allowing parties to tailor the process to their specific needs.
Preservation of Relationships: ADR, particularly mediation, is less adversarial than court litigation and can help maintain relationships between the parties, which is crucial in business or family matters.
Challenges of ADR in Myanmar
Limited Awareness: There is still limited public awareness of ADR mechanisms, particularly in rural areas where traditional court litigation is more commonly used.
Underdeveloped Infrastructure: While progress is being made, there is still a need for further development of ADR infrastructure, including the training of mediators and arbitrators and the creation of more formal ADR institutions.
Enforcement Issues: While arbitration awards are enforceable under the Arbitration Law, the enforcement of mediation agreements can be challenging without clear legal backing.
Cultural Preferences: In some cases, the traditional reliance on the formal court system may make it difficult for some individuals or businesses to embrace ADR as a first option for dispute resolution.
Conclusion
ADR in Myanmar is gaining traction as an alternative to traditional court litigation, particularly in the context of commercial disputes, labor disputes, and family matters. The Arbitration Law of 2016, Mediation Rules, and the establishment of the Myanmar Commercial Dispute Resolution Center (CDRC) mark significant strides toward creating a more formalized and efficient ADR system in the country. However, challenges remain in terms of public awareness, infrastructure, and the enforcement of non-arbitration agreements. Continued development of ADR practices and institutions is expected to further promote its use in Myanmar.
RELATED Blog
0 comments