Alternate Dispute Resolution Law at New Zealand
In New Zealand, Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) is widely used to resolve conflicts outside the traditional courtroom setting. The country has developed a well-established legal framework for ADR that is accessible, cost-effective, and efficient. The methods of ADR in New Zealand typically include mediation, arbitration, conciliation, and negotiation.
Key Types of ADR in New Zealand:
Mediation:
Mediation is one of the most commonly used ADR processes in New Zealand. It involves an impartial third party, the mediator, who helps the disputing parties communicate and explore potential solutions. The mediator does not make decisions but helps guide the parties toward a voluntary resolution.
Mediation is particularly common in family law disputes (such as divorce and child custody), employment disputes, and community conflicts.
Family Dispute Resolution (FDR) is a mandatory process in family law cases before a party can take a case to court, except in cases involving domestic violence or urgency.
Arbitration:
Arbitration is a more formal process where the parties agree to submit their dispute to an arbitrator (or panel of arbitrators), who then renders a legally binding decision. Arbitration is frequently used in commercial disputes, especially in international business transactions.
New Zealand has a strong legal framework for arbitration, governed by the Arbitration Act 1996, which aligns with international standards, particularly the New York Convention (which facilitates the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards).
The Arbitration and Mediation Centre and other private arbitration institutions in New Zealand provide facilities for arbitrations, especially in the commercial sector.
Conciliation:
Conciliation is a more structured form of ADR where a neutral third party (the conciliator) actively suggests solutions to help resolve the dispute. Unlike mediation, where the mediator does not propose solutions, the conciliator may provide guidance or recommendations.
Conciliation is often used in labor disputes, particularly in employment relationships or industrial relations conflicts.
Negotiation:
Negotiation is perhaps the most informal ADR process. It involves direct discussions between the parties to reach a resolution. Negotiation can take place at any stage of a dispute and often occurs before formal ADR processes like mediation or arbitration.
In New Zealand, parties may negotiate directly with each other or with the assistance of lawyers or other professionals.
Legal Framework for ADR in New Zealand:
Arbitration Act 1996:
The Arbitration Act 1996 governs arbitration in New Zealand. This Act provides a comprehensive framework for domestic and international arbitrations, ensuring a fair and neutral process. It aligns with international practices, including recognition of arbitral awards under the New York Convention of 1958.
Family Court Act 1980 & Family Dispute Resolution:
In family law, the Family Court Act 1980 mandates Family Dispute Resolution (FDR) to help parties reach an agreement before proceeding to court. The process is mandatory for issues concerning child custody and contact before a party can apply to the Family Court.
FDR counselors are often involved to facilitate discussions between parents and guardians in family matters.
Employment Relations Act 2000:
In employment matters, the Employment Relations Act 2000 sets out the principles for resolving disputes, emphasizing mediation as the primary method of dispute resolution in employment-related conflicts.
The Employment Mediation Service offers free services to employers and employees to resolve disputes before they escalate to the Employment Relations Authority or the Employment Court.
Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992:
This Act provides mechanisms for resolving disputes in the workplace related to health and safety issues. ADR methods, such as conciliation and mediation, are encouraged before escalating matters to regulatory authorities.
New Zealand Courts and ADR:
The District Court, High Court, and Court of Appeal in New Zealand often encourage or require the use of ADR. Courts have specific rules about how ADR should be employed, particularly in civil cases. Judges may refer parties to mediation as part of the court process to reduce the burden on the courts and find more efficient resolutions.
Mediation Standards:
The New Zealand Law Society provides a framework for professional standards of mediation, particularly for lawyers who wish to act as mediators. It ensures that mediators have the necessary skills and training to conduct mediation in a fair and competent manner.
ADR Institutions in New Zealand:
New Zealand Dispute Resolution Centre:
This is a national organization offering services in mediation, arbitration, and other forms of ADR. It provides services in both commercial and family law matters and helps facilitate settlement negotiations.
Employment Mediation Services:
This government service provides mediation services to resolve workplace disputes. Mediation is compulsory for most employment disputes before they can be taken to the Employment Relations Authority.
Family Dispute Resolution (FDR):
In family disputes, FDR services are government-sponsored and facilitate mediation between parties. Mediators assist parents and guardians in child custody disputes to avoid the need for court intervention.
Arbitration and Mediation Association of New Zealand (AMINZ):
AMINZ is a professional body representing individuals who work in ADR, particularly in the fields of arbitration and mediation. It offers training, certification, and standards for ADR practitioners.
Benefits of ADR in New Zealand:
Cost-Effective: ADR is generally less expensive than litigation, which can involve extensive court fees and legal costs.
Time-Efficient: ADR can resolve disputes more quickly than traditional court procedures, which can take months or years.
Confidentiality: ADR processes like mediation and arbitration are typically confidential, which is particularly appealing in business disputes where confidentiality is crucial.
Flexibility: The parties in ADR processes have more control over the outcome and can explore creative solutions that might not be available in a court decision.
Preservation of Relationships: ADR is often less adversarial than court procedures, which helps preserve professional, personal, or commercial relationships.
Challenges:
Enforceability: While arbitration awards are legally binding and enforceable, the decisions made through mediation and conciliation may not be enforceable unless formalized through the courts.
Limited Awareness: Although ADR is widely used in New Zealand, some individuals and businesses may not fully understand the benefits or may prefer traditional litigation for complex issues.
Access to Services: In remote areas, there may be limited access to ADR services, especially for those who cannot afford professional mediators or arbitrators.
Conclusion:
New Zealand has a robust and well-established framework for Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), making it a popular option for resolving various types of disputes. The country's legal system emphasizes mediation, arbitration, and other forms of ADR, with significant support from government-backed institutions. ADR is encouraged not only in family and employment disputes but also in business and commercial matters, offering benefits like cost efficiency, speed, and confidentiality. However, challenges around enforceability and access to services in rural areas may still exist.
RELATED Blog
0 comments