Alternate Dispute Resolution Law at Nepal

In Nepal, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is a key element of the legal system, providing individuals and businesses with mechanisms to resolve disputes outside of the formal court system. ADR methods, including mediation, arbitration, and conciliation, are increasingly used, especially in commercial, family, and labor-related disputes. The government and legal framework in Nepal have taken steps to encourage the use of ADR to reduce the burden on the judicial system and promote faster, more cost-effective resolutions.

1. Arbitration in Nepal:

Arbitration is one of the most prominent forms of ADR in Nepal, particularly in commercial and civil disputes. The Arbitration Act of 1999 (amended in 2019) governs arbitration procedures in Nepal and aligns with international standards for resolving disputes.

Arbitration Act, 1999 (Amended 2019): The Arbitration Act provides a comprehensive legal framework for arbitration in Nepal, including the appointment of arbitrators, the conduct of arbitration proceedings, and the enforcement of arbitral awards.

Nepal's Adherence to International Standards: Nepal has signed the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958), which ensures that arbitral awards made in Nepal are recognized and enforceable in other countries.

Arbitration Council: The Nepal Arbitration Council has been established to provide a framework for conducting arbitration and to maintain a list of qualified arbitrators. It promotes arbitration as an efficient and effective means of dispute resolution.

Arbitration Centers: Various private institutions, such as the Nepal Chamber of Commerce and the Nepal International Arbitration Center (NIAC), provide arbitration services and offer guidance for both domestic and international arbitrations.

2. Mediation in Nepal:

Mediation is widely used in Nepal, particularly for resolving family, civil, and commercial disputes. Mediation involves a neutral third party (the mediator) helping the disputing parties reach a mutually acceptable agreement.

Mediation Law: The Mediation Act, 2011 governs the practice of mediation in Nepal, establishing a legal basis for its use in both court and non-court proceedings. The Act encourages parties to use mediation before resorting to formal litigation.

Court-Annexed Mediation: Nepal’s Supreme Court and district courts have established mediation programs, particularly in family law, property disputes, and commercial cases. Courts may refer cases to mediation or suggest it as an option to resolve disputes.

Mediation Centers: Various mediation centers have been established in Nepal, often through local non-governmental organizations (NGOs) or government initiatives, to provide mediation services. These centers offer trained mediators and provide services at low cost or for free, especially in rural areas.

Mediation and Family Law: Mediation is particularly common in family law disputes, such as divorce, child custody, and inheritance matters, as it allows parties to reach amicable agreements while preserving relationships.

3. Conciliation in Nepal:

Conciliation is another ADR method that is used in Nepal, particularly in labor disputes and civil matters. Conciliation is a process where a third party helps the disputing parties negotiate and reach a settlement.

Labor Disputes: The Labor Act, 2017 provides for conciliation in labor disputes. The Labor Office or the Labor Court can appoint conciliators to assist in resolving conflicts between employers and employees, particularly in matters related to wages, working conditions, and wrongful termination.

Role of the Labor Department: The Department of Labor plays a key role in facilitating conciliation in labor disputes, often assisting in resolving conflicts before they escalate to litigation.

General Conciliation: In addition to labor disputes, conciliation may also be used in other civil disputes, such as commercial disagreements or neighborhood conflicts, often with the help of local leaders, mediators, or government-appointed conciliators.

4. Key Institutions for ADR in Nepal:

Nepal Arbitration Council (NAC): The Arbitration Council is a governmental body that facilitates arbitration proceedings in Nepal. It helps in the appointment of arbitrators, provides support to arbitration tribunals, and maintains a registry of qualified arbitrators.

Nepal International Arbitration Center (NIAC): NIAC is an independent body that promotes and facilitates international and domestic arbitration. It provides administrative support for arbitration proceedings and offers training and awareness programs to the public and legal professionals.

Supreme Court of Nepal: The Supreme Court plays a role in encouraging ADR, particularly mediation, and may refer cases to court-annexed mediation centers.

District Courts: The district courts in Nepal also have their own mediation programs, encouraging parties to resolve disputes amicably before proceeding with litigation.

5. Benefits of ADR in Nepal:

Cost-Effectiveness: ADR is often less expensive than litigation, particularly in complex or prolonged cases. It helps save both financial resources and time.

Efficiency: ADR methods like arbitration and mediation are generally faster than going through formal court procedures, which can be slow and overloaded in Nepal's judicial system.

Confidentiality: ADR processes, particularly mediation and arbitration, are private and confidential, which helps protect sensitive information and preserves relationships.

Flexibility: ADR offers a flexible process that can be tailored to the needs of the parties involved, allowing them to take control of the resolution process.

6. Court's Role in ADR:

The courts in Nepal have a supportive role in encouraging ADR:

Court-Annexed Mediation: Nepal's courts actively promote mediation, particularly in family law and civil disputes. Many district courts have established mediation programs to resolve cases before they go to trial.

Referral to ADR: Judges can encourage parties to use ADR methods such as mediation or arbitration before proceeding with litigation, especially in disputes where settlement is likely.

Enforcement of Arbitration Awards: The Arbitration Act provides a mechanism for enforcing domestic and international arbitration awards in Nepal, ensuring that the outcomes of arbitration proceedings are upheld by the courts.

7. Challenges of ADR in Nepal:

Awareness and Acceptance: Despite the legal framework supporting ADR, public awareness of ADR options like arbitration and mediation remains relatively low in some parts of Nepal, particularly in rural areas.

Limited Resources: There is a shortage of trained mediators, arbitrators, and specialized ADR institutions in some regions, which can affect the quality and accessibility of ADR services.

Cultural Factors: In some cases, traditional norms and cultural factors may make it challenging to fully embrace ADR, particularly in disputes involving community or family issues.

Conclusion:

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in Nepal has become an increasingly important mechanism for resolving disputes efficiently and cost-effectively, particularly in commercial, labor, and family law matters. With the Arbitration Act (1999), Mediation Act (2011), and various institutions like the Nepal Arbitration Council and Nepal International Arbitration Center, the country is fostering a more accessible and flexible approach to dispute resolution. While challenges remain, such as a lack of awareness in some regions, the government’s continued support for ADR is helping to reduce the burden on the judicial system and promote fair and peaceful resolution of conflicts.

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments