Endangered Species under Environmental Law
1. Introduction
Endangered species are animals or plants that are at risk of extinction due to a rapid decline in their population or a loss of their critical habitat. Environmental law plays a pivotal role in protecting these species by regulating human activities that threaten biodiversity.
Within the framework of Environmental Law, the protection of endangered species is generally treated as a conservation objective, rooted in the principle of ecological balance and sustainable development.
2. Key Concepts in Environmental Law Related to Endangered Species
Biodiversity Conservation: Biodiversity refers to the variety of life forms on Earth. The loss of endangered species diminishes biodiversity.
Ecological Interdependence: Every species plays a role in its ecosystem; the extinction of one species can disrupt entire ecosystems.
Precautionary Principle: If an action may cause harm to the environment or species, in the absence of scientific consensus, the burden of proof falls on those advocating the action.
Sustainable Development: Meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs – which includes preserving endangered species.
3. Protection Mechanisms Under Environmental Law
Identification of Endangered Species: Scientific assessments categorize species as endangered, critically endangered, vulnerable, etc.
Habitat Protection: Restricting deforestation, mining, and urbanization in areas where endangered species live.
Restrictions on Hunting and Trade: Prohibiting or regulating the capture, killing, or trade of endangered species.
Conservation Programs: Including breeding programs, reintroduction to the wild, and community-based conservation.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Mandates consideration of effects on endangered species before approving projects.
4. Landmark Case Laws Involving Endangered Species
A. T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India (1996)
Facts: The petitioner brought attention to the degradation of forests in India.
Held: The Supreme Court expanded the definition of "forest" and emphasized the need to protect forest cover.
Relevance: The court noted that forests are the natural habitats of various endangered species, and thus their protection indirectly contributes to species conservation.
Significance: Established a legal foundation for judicial activism in environmental matters, including protection of wildlife.
B. Centre for Environmental Law, WWF-India v. Union of India (2013)
Facts: This case concerned the protection of critically endangered species like the Asiatic Lion and Great Indian Bustard.
Held: The Supreme Court directed the translocation of Asiatic lions from Gujarat to Madhya Pradesh to prevent extinction due to disease or calamity in a single location.
Significance: Emphasized scientific wildlife management and inter-state cooperation for species preservation.
C. Animal Welfare Board of India v. A. Nagaraja (2014)
Facts: Challenge to the practice of "Jallikattu" (bull taming sport).
Held: The Supreme Court ruled in favor of animal welfare and banned the practice, citing cruelty and violation of animal rights.
Relevance: Though not directly about endangered species, the case upheld animal rights and welfare as part of environmental protection.
5. Constitutional Framework Supporting Endangered Species Protection
Although not using any external law, it is crucial to understand how Environmental Law as a branch relies on constitutional provisions:
Article 21 – Right to Life: Interpreted by courts to include the right to a healthy environment, which extends to preserving biodiversity.
Article 48A – Directive Principles: Mandates the State to protect and improve the environment and safeguard forests and wildlife.
Article 51A(g) – Fundamental Duty: Imposes a duty on citizens to protect and improve the natural environment, including forests and wildlife.
6. Challenges in Protecting Endangered Species
Habitat Loss: Due to urbanization, industrialization, and agriculture.
Poaching and Illegal Wildlife Trade
Climate Change: Alters habitats and disrupts breeding cycles.
Human-Wildlife Conflict
Weak Enforcement: Even when laws exist, enforcement mechanisms may be lacking.
7. Judicial Approach to Species Protection
Courts in various jurisdictions have played a proactive role:
Expanded Locus Standi: Allowing NGOs and individuals to file PILs (Public Interest Litigations) for environmental causes.
Ecocentric View: Courts have shifted from anthropocentric (human-centered) to ecocentric (nature-centered) approaches.
Recognition of Species as Legal Entities: In some rulings, animals or rivers have been given the status of a legal person to ensure better protection.
8. Conclusion
The protection of endangered species under environmental law is a multifaceted obligation involving legal, ethical, and ecological considerations. Through a combination of constitutional mandates, judicial interventions, and administrative regulations, environmental law seeks to preserve endangered species not just for their intrinsic value but also for the health and survival of the planet's ecosystems.
RELATED Blog
0 comments