Easements, Covenants, and Nuisance under Property Law
Easements, Covenants, and Nuisance in Property Law
These are important concepts that regulate the rights and obligations related to land and property use. They often deal with conflicts between neighbors or different landowners.
1. Easements
Definition:
An easement is a right that one landowner has over the land of another. It allows the holder to use another's land for a specific purpose without owning it.
Types of Easements:
Affirmative Easement: Allows the holder to do something on the neighbor’s land (e.g., right of way).
Negative Easement: Restricts the owner of the land from doing something that would affect the holder (e.g., blocking light).
Key Elements:
Must benefit the dominant tenement (the land enjoying the easement).
Must burden the servient tenement (the land over which the easement is exercised).
The right must be certain and not too vague.
Case Law Examples:
Re Ellenborough Park (a classic case): The court held that a right to use a communal garden could be an easement because it was a right over another's land that was connected with the dominant land, capable of forming an easement, and was not too vague.
Copeland v Greenhalf: A claim for an easement was rejected because the claimed right (storing vehicles on the land) was essentially a claim to possession, which is not an easement.
2. Covenants
Definition:
A covenant is a promise made by one landowner to another, usually relating to the use of land. Covenants can be positive (requiring an action) or negative/restrictive (restricting certain activities).
Key Features:
They bind the land, not just the parties (in some cases).
Require clear intention to bind successors.
Can be used to control land use, for example, to prevent building beyond certain limits.
Case Law Examples:
Tulk v Moxhay: A landmark case establishing that restrictive covenants can bind subsequent purchasers of land if they have notice of the covenant and it "touches and concerns" the land. The defendant had agreed not to build on the land, and even after selling it, was bound by the covenant.
Rhone v Stephens: The court held that positive covenants generally do not bind successors in title at law because they impose an obligation to do something rather than refrain from doing something.
3. Nuisance
Definition:
Nuisance is an unlawful interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land. It can be private (affecting an individual or a few persons) or public (affecting the community or public at large).
Types of Nuisance:
Private Nuisance: Interference with enjoyment of land such as noise, smells, or vibrations.
Public Nuisance: Acts affecting the health, safety, or comfort of the public.
Key Elements:
The interference must be substantial and unreasonable.
There must be actual damage or interference.
Balancing interests is important — what may be reasonable in one area may be nuisance in another.
Case Law Examples:
Sturges v Bridgman: This case involved a dispute where noise from a confectioner’s machinery was held to be a nuisance to a doctor who began using his property as a consulting room. The court emphasized the importance of locality.
Halsey v Esso Petroleum: Nuisance was found where noise and fumes from an oil depot interfered with the enjoyment of nearby properties.
Hunter v Canary Wharf: The court emphasized that only those with a legal interest in the land could bring an action in nuisance.
Summary of Differences and Relationships
| Aspect | Easements | Covenants | Nuisance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nature | Right over another’s land | Promise related to land use | Interference with use/enjoyment of land |
| Benefit/Obligation | Benefit to dominant land, burden on servient | Can bind successors if conditions met | Liability for unreasonable interference |
| Legal Focus | Use of land rights | Restriction or obligation on land use | Protection of land enjoyment |
| Example Case | Re Ellenborough Park | Tulk v Moxhay | Sturges v Bridgman |
Conclusion
In Property Law, Easements grant rights to use another’s land, Covenants regulate promises about land use, and Nuisance protects against unreasonable interference with land enjoyment. Case law has shaped these concepts, ensuring balance between landowners’ rights and responsibilities, and resolving disputes fairly based on established principles.
RELATED Blog
0 comments