Contractual Restrictions on Land Use under Land Use Law
Contractual Restrictions on Land Use under Land Use Law
1. Definition and Nature:
Contractual restrictions on land use are limitations agreed upon by parties through private contracts or agreements that restrict the way landowners or occupiers may use their property. These are not imposed by law or government regulations but arise from mutual consent—typically through deeds, covenants, easements, or agreements attached to the land.
Such restrictions are binding on the parties involved and, in many cases, their successors in title, affecting the use and development of the land.
2. Types of Contractual Restrictions:
Restrictive Covenants: Clauses in a deed or agreement that prohibit certain uses or require certain actions relating to the land (e.g., "no commercial activities on residential land").
Easements: Rights granted to a party over land owned by another for a specific purpose (e.g., right of way, right to install utilities).
Conditions in Leases: Leases often include terms restricting use (e.g., no subletting, no alteration of premises).
Agreements between Landowners: Such as agreements not to develop certain parts of land or to maintain a certain character in a neighborhood.
3. Legal Basis and Enforcement:
Contractual restrictions derive from contract law principles, meaning parties voluntarily agree to restrictions.
These restrictions bind parties privately, unlike statutory zoning laws or public land use regulations.
Enforcement usually involves civil remedies such as injunctions or damages. For example, a landowner affected by a breach of a restrictive covenant may seek a court injunction to stop the offending use.
Importantly, contractual restrictions must be clearly expressed and are strictly construed against the party seeking enforcement.
4. Relation to Public Land Use Regulations:
Contractual restrictions do not override public land use laws but coexist.
A land use permitted by contract but prohibited by law is invalid (e.g., a contract allowing commercial use in a zoning-residential area would be unenforceable).
Conversely, public law cannot override private contractual restrictions unless the public law specifically abrogates such contracts.
Case Law Examples
Case 1: Tulk v. Moxhay (1848) 41 ER 1143
This is a foundational case in English land law concerning restrictive covenants.
Facts: The owner of a piece of land in Leicester Square sold it with a covenant restricting its use to gardens only.
Issue: Whether the covenant was enforceable against subsequent purchasers who had notice of the covenant.
Ruling: The court held that the restrictive covenant was enforceable against subsequent owners who had notice, establishing the principle that equitable servitudes (restrictive covenants) run with the land.
Significance: This case underpins the enforcement of contractual land use restrictions even after the original parties have sold the land.
Case 2: Eastwood v. Kenyon (1840) 11 Ad & E 438
Concerned with the enforceability of restrictive covenants against successors in title.
The court held that restrictive covenants do not generally run with the land at common law unless certain conditions are met, emphasizing the need for clear intention and notice.
This case highlights the importance of how contractual restrictions are drafted and recorded.
Case 3: Rogers v. Hosegood (1900) 82 LT 109
In this case, the court examined the scope and application of a restrictive covenant concerning land use.
The ruling emphasized that restrictive covenants are to be interpreted strictly and must be reasonable in scope.
5. Key Principles in Contractual Land Use Restrictions:
Notice: Successors in title must have notice (actual, constructive, or implied) of the restriction for it to be enforceable.
Intention: The original parties must have intended the covenant to run with the land.
Touch and Concern the Land: The covenant must relate to the land and its use, not be merely personal.
Reasonableness: The restrictions must be reasonable in terms of geographic area, duration, and nature.
Summary
Contractual restrictions on land use arise from private agreements, unlike zoning laws.
They bind parties through restrictive covenants, easements, or lease conditions.
Enforcement is through civil remedies based on contract and property law principles.
Key cases like Tulk v. Moxhay establish the enforceability of these restrictions against successors.
The restrictions must be clear, reasonable, intended to bind successors, and must not conflict with public land use laws.
RELATED Blog
0 comments